Fusari, Angelo and Pellissier, Murray (2008): Some new indicators and procedure to get additional information from the Business Tendency Surveys.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75170.pdf Download (465kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper sets out some procedure allowing to deriving new information from the Business Tendency Surveys. Precisely, the volatility of respondents’ opinions will be computed that can be interpreted as a measure of radical (or true) uncertainty. This measure is strongly recommended by the present economic crisis originated by financial markets that the dominating idea of the impossibility of measuring and hence monitoring radical uncertainty has contributed to consign to an unconstrained and destabilizing speculation. Moreover, some indicators of the persistence of each modality of answer are proposed, as well as a correction of the usual percent of the modalities of survey answers that attributes a higher weight to the answers that do not change in successive survey periods. This correction is mainly suggested by the fact that the degree of persistence of respondents’ opinions is an important sign of entrepreneurs and firms’ behaviour and decisionmaking. The modified percents of the modalities of answers are confronted to the usual ones, and some econometric estimations are provided. The applications use data of the Italian and South African business tendency surveys on a number of variables. The resulting information and elaborations seem to suggest some critical consideration on the content of the harmonized EU surveys, mainly with reference to the reliability of the confidence indicators and the disregard of the volatility of answers with its attitude to provide a meaningful indicator of radical uncertainty
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Some new indicators and procedure to get additional information from the Business Tendency Surveys |
English Title: | Some new indicators and procedure to get additional information from the Business Tendency Surveys |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Business Tendency Surveys, Expectations, Uncertainty, Business confidence indicators, Econometric estimations |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C19 - Other C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C89 - Other C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General |
Item ID: | 75170 |
Depositing User: | Angelo Fusari |
Date Deposited: | 20 Nov 2016 09:39 |
Last Modified: | 09 Oct 2019 12:07 |
References: | Some references to authors’ works on BTS Fusari A. (2005), A model of the innovation-adaptation mechanism driving economic dynamics. A micro representation, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol 15, n° 3, pp. 297-333 23 Fusari A. (2006 a), Radical uncertainty indicators. Quantitative specifications and applications, 28th CIRET Conference, Rome Fusari A. (2006 b), The theoretic and empirical importance of measuring uncertainty, readings, 28th CIRET Conference, Rome Pellissier, GM (2006), Evaluating the impact of disaggregated survey panel response on Business tendency survey results, OECD Workshop, Rome Pellissier, GM (2007), Business conditions Response: Volatility versus Non-volatility, Mimeo, Bureau of Economic Research, Stellenbosch Wymer C. R. (1993), “Rwesimul and Escona program, manual and documentation” (mimeo) and WYSEA Systems Estimation and Analysis (computer package). 24 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75170 |