A New Test of Ricardian Equivalence Using the Narrative Record on Tax Changes

Haug, Alfred A. (2016): A New Test of Ricardian Equivalence Using the Narrative Record on Tax Changes.

Abstract

This paper empirically tests the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis with a narrative measure of tax shocks. The present value, at the time of legislation, of tax increases motivated solely by concerns for improving the fiscal health of the government is used for the tests. These tax news represent a switch from debt to tax financing that should have no effects on the economy if Ricardian equivalence holds as a good approximation. For the post-1980:IV period, I find evidence for fiscal anticipation as many of the tax increases are implemented with substantial delays and distortionary taxes increase economic activity before taxes go up, which iscaused by intertemporal substitution. Therefore, Ricardian equivalence is rejected.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ricardian equivalence hypothesis; narrative record; exogenous tax changes; government budget deficits
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

Barro, Robert J. (1989). The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 37-54.

Barro, Robert J. (1974). Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82, 1095-117.

Brown, R. L., J. Durbin, and J. M. Evans (1975). Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over Time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 149–192.

Cloyne, James (2013). Discretionary Tax Changes and the Macroeconomy: New Narrative Evidence from the United Kingdom. American Economic Review 103, 1507–1528.

Evans, George W., Seppo Honkapohja and Kaushik Mitra (2012). Does Ricardian Equivalence Hold When Expectations Are Not Rational? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 44, 1259 1283.

Evans, Paul (1991). Is Ricardian Equivalence a Good Approximation? Economic Inquiry 29, 626–644.

Favero, Carlo, and Francesco Giavazzi (2012). Measuring Tax Multipliers: The Narrative Method in Fiscal VARs. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4, 69-94.

Hakkio, Craig S., and Mark Rush (1991). Is the Budget Deficit 'Too Large'? Economic Inquiry 29, 429-445.

Haug, Alfred A. (1996). Blanchard's Model of Consumption: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 14, 169-177.

Judd, Kenneth (1987). Debt and Distortionary Taxation in a Simple Perfect Foresight Model. Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 51-72.

Leeper, Eric M., Walker, Todd B., and Shu-Chun S. Yang (2008). Fiscal Foresight: Analytics and Econometrics. Working Paper No. 14028, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ramey, Valery A. (2011). Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It's all in the Timing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 1-50.

Ricciuti, Roberto (2003). Assessing Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Economic Surveys 17, 55-78.

Romer, Christina D., and David H. Romer (2010). The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Policy Shocks. American Economic Review 100, 763-801.

Romer, Christina D., and David H. Romer (2009a). Do Tax Cuts Starve the Beast? The Effects of Tax Changes on Government Spending. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 139-200.

Romer, Christina D., and David H. Romer (2009b). A Narrative Analysis of Postwar Tax Changes. https://www.aeaweb.org//articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.100.3.

Seater, John J. (1993). Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Economic Literature 31, 142-190.