Does municipal mergers internalize spatial spillover effects? Empirical evidence from Japanese municipalities

Saito, Hitoshi and Hirota, Haruaki and Yunoue, Hideo and Miyaki, Miki (2017): Does municipal mergers internalize spatial spillover effects? Empirical evidence from Japanese municipalities.

Abstract

This paper investigates whether municipal mergers could internalize spatial spillover effects by comparing mergers before and after they occur, especially focusing on local public library services in Japan. A spatial spillover effect occurs when the benefit of a local public service spreads across not only its own administrative district but also into neighboring ones. A free rider problem among municipalities might be caused when a municipality makes a policy decision regarding how much it supplies to its own local public service under a decentralization system, recognizing the existence of a spatial spillover effect. Under such circumstances, spatial spillover effects might be internalized through municipal mergers. In Japan, the boundaries of administrative districts—including those of municipalities—have been determined based on traditional or historical reasons. However, large-scale municipal mergers took place in FY2004 and FY2005 due to serious fiscal deficits and a rapidly aging population. Consequently, the number of municipalities in Japan has decreased from 3,232 to 1,820. In light of these facts, we examine whether municipal mergers internalize spatial spillover effects, focusing on Japanese local public library services, by applying cross-sectional spatial autoregressive models. As a result, we found that there are spatial spillover effects in public library services both in FY2001 (before) and in FY2008 (after). We also found that the impact of such spillovers in FY2008 is smaller than that in FY2001. The results imply that municipal mergers could at least partially internalize spatial spillover effects among municipalities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: spatial spillover effect, municipal mergers
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health ; Education ; Welfare ; Public Pensions; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession

References

・Akai, N., & Suhara, M. (2013). Strategic interaction among local governments in Japan: An application to cultural expenditure. Japanese Economic Review,64(2), 232-247.

・Anselin, L., & Bera, A. K. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. Statistics Textbooks and Monographs, 155, 237-290.

・Baicker, K. (2005). The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of public economics, 89(2), 529-544.

・Blesse, S., & Baskaran, T. (2016). Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence from a German federal state. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 59, 54-74.

・Case, A. C., Rosen, H. S., & Hines, J. R. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of public economics, 52(3), 285-307.

・Dahlby, B. (1996). Fiscal externalities and the design of intergovernmental grants. International tax and public finance, 3(3), 397-412.

・DeBoer, L. (1992). Economies of scale and input substitution in public libraries. Journal of Urban Economics, 32(2), 257-268.

・Figlio, D. N., Kolpin, V. W., & Reid, W. E. (1999). Do states play welfare games?. Journal of Urban economics, 46(3), 437-454.

・Finney, M. M., & Yoon, M. J. (2003). Asymmetric interdependence in the provision of a local public good: An empirical examination. Public Finance Review, 31(6), 648-668.

・Gordon, N., & Knight, B. (2009). A spatial merger estimator with an application to school district consolidation. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5), 752-765.

・Hanes, N. (2002). Spatial spillover effects in the Swedish local rescue services. Regional Studies, 36(5), 531-539.

・Hansen, S. W. (2014). Common pool size and project size: an empirical test on expenditures using Danish municipal mergers. Public choice, 159(1-2), 3-21.

・Hammond, C. J. (2002). Efficiency in the provision of public services: a data envelopment analysis of UK public library systems. Applied Economics, 34(5), 649-657.

・Haughwout, A. F. (1999). Regional fiscal cooperation in metropolitan areas: an exploration. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 579-600.

・Hinnerich, B. T. (2009). Do merging local governments free ride on their counterparts when facing boundary reform?. Journal of Public Economics, 93(5), 721-728.

・Hirota, H., 2007. Verication of municipal incorporation with discrete choice model [in Japanese]. Planning Administration, 30 (4), 75-81.

・Hirota, H., &Yunoue, H., 2013. Municipal mergers and local government expenditure in Japan: Panel analysis of scale effect and secular change [in Japanese]. Studies in Regional Science 43 (3), 325-340.

・Hirota, H., & Yunoue, H. (2016). Evaluation of the fiscal effect on municipal mergers: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japanese municipal data. MPRA paper No.72455

・Jordahl, H., & Liang, C. Y. (2010). Merged municipalities, higher debt: on free-riding and the common pool problem in politics. Public Choice, 143(1-2), 157-172.

・Kawaura, A. (2010). Self-Serving mayors and local government consolidations in japan. University of Hawaii Department of Economics Working Paper.

・LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press

・Lundberg, J. (2006). Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services. Regional Studies, 40(6), 631-644.

・Miyashita,T.(2011). Reasons for Municipalities Not to Agree to A Merger Plan [in Japanese] . Public Choice Review,57,4-20.

・Miyazaki, T. (2006) Effect of municipal merger on expenditure reduction - detection by merger trend variable[in Japanese]. Policy Making in the Era of Low Birth-Rate Populations(ZaiseiKenkyu),2,145-160

・Miyazaki, T. (2014). Municipal consolidation and local government behavior: evidence from Japanese voting data on merger referenda. Economics of Governance, 15(4), 387-410.

・Murdoch, J. C., Rahmatian, M., & Thayer, M. A. (1993). A spatially autoregressive median voter model of recreation expenditures. Public Finance Review, 21(3), 334-350.

・Nakazawa, K. (2016). Amalgamation, free-rider behavior, and regulation. International Tax and Public Finance, 23(5) 812-833.

・Nakazawa, K.& Miyashita,T. (2014). Municipality amalgamation in Japan: an examination using event history analysis, Economics Bulletin, Vol.34 No.2, pp.627-633.

・Nishikawa,M.(2002). Policy evaluation of merger of municipalities [in Japanese],Nihon keizai　kenkyu ,46, 61-79.

・Reingewertz, Y. (2012). Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics, 72(2), 240-251.

・Ross, M. H. (1977). Accountability, Productivity and the Impending Crisis in the Public Library. The Journal of Economics, 3, 165-68.

・Solé-Ollé, A. (2006). Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(1), 32-53.

・Vitaliano, D. F. (1997). X-inefficiency in the public sector: the case of libraries. Public Finance Review, 25(6), 629-643.

・Werck, K., Heyndels, B., & Geys, B. (2008). The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32(1), 35-58.