Competition, Patent Protection, and Innovation in an Endogenous Market Structure

Suzuki, Keishun (2017): Competition, Patent Protection, and Innovation in an Endogenous Market Structure.

Abstract

This study revisits the relationship between competition and innovation by incorporating an endogenous market structure (EMS) in a dynamic general equilibrium model. We consider that both innovative and non-innovative followers engage in Cournot competition with free entry. A competition-enhancing policy, which reduces entry cost, can stimulate the entry of innovative followers when the entry cost is high. However, when the entry cost is sufficiently low, the entry of non-innovative followers crowd-out innovative followers from the market. As a result, there is a non-monotonic relationship (inverted-V shape) between competition and innovation. Furthermore, we show that, while strengthening patent protection positively affects innovation when competition is sufficiently intense, the effect may be negative under milder competition. This suggests that a competition policy could complement a patent policy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Competition, Patent Protection, Innovation, Endogenous Market Structure
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

[1] Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). “Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-728.

[2] Aghion, P., Harris, C., & Vickers, J. (1997). “Competition and growth with step-bystep innovation: An example,” European Economic Review, 41(3), 771-782.

[3] Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P., & Vickers, J. (2001). “Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation,” The Review of Economic Studies, 68(3), 467-492.

[4] Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2015). “Patent rights, product market reforms, and innovation,” Journal of Economic Growth, 20(3), 223-262.

[5] Bartelsman, E. J., & Doms, M. (2000). “Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata.” Journal of Economic literature, 38(3), 569-594.

[6] Bento, P. (2014). “Competition as a Discovery Procedure: Schumpeter Meets Hayek in a Model of Innovation,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(3), 124-152.

[7] Blazsek, S., & Escribano, A. (2016). “Patent propensity, R&D and market competition: Dynamic spillovers of innovation leaders and followers,” Journal of Econometrics, 191(1), 145-163.

[8] Boone, J. (2001). “Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), 705-726.

[9] Chu, A. C., Furukawa, Y., & Ji, L. (2016). “Patents, R&D subsidies, and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy,” Southern Economic Journal, 82(3), 809-825.

[10] Cohen, W. M. (2010). “Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance,” In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 129-213.

[11] Correa, J. A., & Ornaghi, C. (2014). “Competition & Innovation: Evidence from US Patent and Productivity Data,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 62(2), 258-285.

[12] Cysne, R. P., & Turchick, D. (2012). “Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(6), 851-861.

[13] Denicolo, V., & Zanchettin, P. (2010). “Competition, market selection and growth,” The Economic Journal, 120(545), 761-785.

[14] Etro, F. (2007). “Competition, innovation, and antitrust,” Springer Science & Business Media.

[15] Etro, F. (2009). “Endogenous Market Structures and Business Cycles,” Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[16] Falvey, R., Foster, N., & Greenaway, D. (2006). “Intellectual property rights and economic growth,” Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700-719.

[17] Futagami, K., & Iwaisako, T. (2007). “Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model,” Journal of Economic Theory, 132(1), 306-334.

[18] Furukawa, Y. (2007). “The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(11), 3644-3670.

[19] Garcia-Macia, D., Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2016). “How Destructive is Innovation? (No. w22953),” National Bureau of Economic Research.

[20] Greenhalgh, C., & Rogers, M. (2010). “Innovation, intellectual property, and economic growth,” Princeton University Press.

[21] Grossman, G. & Helpman, E. (1991): “Chapter 4, Rising Product Quality, ” In “Innovation and growth in the global economy,” MIT Press, Cambridge.

[22] Hashmi, A. R. (2013). “Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1653-1668.

[23] Horii, R., & Iwaisako, T. (2007). “Economic growth with imperfect protection of intellectual property rights,” Journal of Economics, 90(1), 45-85.

[24] Iwaisako, T., Tanaka, H., & Futagami, K. (2011). “A welfare analysis of global patent protection in a model with endogenous innovation and foreign direct investment,” European Economic Review, 55(8), 1137-1151.

[25] Van de Klundert, T., & Smulders, S. (1997). “Growth, competition and welfare,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(1), 99-118.

[26] Minniti, A. (2009). “Growth, Inter-Industry And Intra-Industry Competition And Welfare,” Japanese Economic Review, 60(1), 110-132.

[27] Peretto, P. F. (1999). “Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 43(1), 173-195.

[28] Rockett, K. (2010). “Property rights and invention,” In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 315-380.

[29] Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). “Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy,” 3d Ed. New York, Harper [1962].

[30] Suzuki, K. (2015).“ Economic growth under two forms of intellectual property rights protection: patents and trade secrets,” Journal of Economics, 115(1), 49-71.