Libman, Emiliano (2017): Asymmetric Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies in Latin America.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_78864.pdf Download (427kB) | Preview |
Abstract
During the last decades, the number of countries that adopted more fexible exchange rate regimes, in particular Inflation Targeting, has been increasing steadily. Latin-America was no exception. Some authors have argued that there is a flaw in the way in which the system has been conducted in the region. When inflation falls, the Central Bank is reluctant to cut interest rates, but when inflation increases, the Central Bank is willing to raise interest rates very aggressively, adding an unnecessary bias to monetary and exchange rate policies. This paper analyzes the asymmetry of monetary and exchange rate policies in the five largest Latin-American Inflation Targeting countries, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. Using different econometric techniques, I find that the Central Banks, with the exception of Chile, suffer from "fear of floating". This is a more pronounced phenomenon for the case of Brazil and Mexico, as the literature has argued.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Asymmetric Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies in Latin America |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Exchange Rates, Exchange Rate Regimes, Inflation Targeting, Asymmetric Policy Rule, Markov-Switching Models, GMM, STAR Models. |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F30 - General F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies |
Item ID: | 78864 |
Depositing User: | Dr Emiliano Libman |
Date Deposited: | 01 May 2017 11:49 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 16:24 |
References: | [1] Ball, L. (1999). Policy rules for open economies. In Taylor, J. (ed.) Monetary Policy Rules, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [2] Barbosa-Filho, N. (2015). Monetary policy with a volatile exchange rate: the case of Brazil since 1999. Comparative Economic Studies, 57, 401-425. [3] Bernanke, B., and Mishkin, F. (1997). Inflation targeting. A new framework for monetary policy?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), 97-116. [4] Calvo, G., and Reinhart, C. (2002). Fear of Floating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117(2), 379-408. [5] Chang, R. (2008). Infation targeting, reserve accumulation, and exchange rate management in Latin America. Borradores de Econom��a No. 487, Banco de la Rep�ublica de Colombia. [6] Dornbusch, R. (1983). Real interest rates, home goods, and optimal external borrowing. Journal of Political Economy, 91(1), 141-153. [7] Frenkel, R. (2008). The competitive real exchange-rate regime, inflation and monetary policy. Cepal Review, 96, 191-201. [8] Kaminsky, G., Lizondo, S., and Reinhart, C. (1998). Leading indicators of currency crises. IMF Staff Papers, 45(1), 1-48. [9] LevyYeyati, E., and Sturzenegger, F. (2007). The effect of monetary and exchange rate policies on development. The Handbook of Development Economics, Elsevier. [10] Mussa, M. (1986). Nominal exchange regimes and the behavior of real exchange rates: evidence and implications. Carneige-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 117-214. [11] Oistein, R., and Torvik, R. (2004). Exchange rate versus inflation targeting: a theory of output fluctuations in traded and non-traded sectors. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 13(3), 265-285. [12] Pontines, V., and Siregar, R. (2012). Exchange rate asymmetry and flexible exchange rates under inflation targeting regimes: Evidence four East and Southeast Asian countries. Review of International Economics, 20(5), 893-908. [13] Reinhart, C., and Kaminsky, G. (1999). The twin crises: the causes of banking and balance-of-payments problems. American Economic Review, 89(3), 473-500. [14] Ros, J. (2015). Central bank policies in Mexico: targets, instruments, and performance. Comparative Economic Studies, 57, 483-510. [15] Rudebusch, G. and Svensson, L. (1999). Policy rules for inflation targeting. in Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules, University of Chicago Press. [16] Ruge-Murcia, F. (2003). Inflation targeting under asymmetric preferences. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(5), 763-785. [17] Tadeu-Lima, G., Setter�eld, M. y da Silveira, J. (2014). Inflation Targeting and Macroeconomic Stability with Heterogeneous Inflation Expectations. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 37(2), 255-279. [18] Taylor, J. (1993). Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214. [19] Terasvirta, T., and Anderson, H. (1992). Characterizing nonlinearities in business cycles using smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, 11936. [20] Terasvirta, T.: (1998). Modeling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions. In Ullah, A. and Giles, D. (eds), Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, New York: Marcel Dekker, 50752. [21] van Dijk, D., Terasvirta, T., and Franses, P. (2002). Smooth transition autoregressive models. A survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews, 21, 1-47. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/78864 |