Romania: Many Entrepreneurs but Few Innovators

Badulescu, Daniel and Cadar, Otilia (2016): Romania: Many Entrepreneurs but Few Innovators. Published in: The Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Sciences , Vol. 1, No. XXV (1 June 2016): pp. 465-475.

Abstract

Entrepreneurship is considered an essential element for the development and prosperity of contemporary economies. The already known traits: creating jobs, boosting growth, revenues to the state budget, are supplemented by vitality and adaptability, and not least, a capacity for innovation. Thus, innovation became one of the most important factors in the companies’ activity. However, innovation doesn’t only mean new products and services. It is closely related to the capacity of entrepreneurs and managers to apply new business models, embedding an organizational culture capable to identify how new ideas could be converted into value for business and society. Innovation supports the efforts of ambitious entrepreneurs to pursue their objectives and stimulate other potential entrepreneurs to enter into businesses. Innovation generates, directly and indirectly, positive effects not only within a company but also within the national economy, as a whole. Despite this empirical evidence, the link between entrepreneurship and innovation is difficult to describe, to introduce it in strong theoretical models, in order to substantiate viable political programs. First, only a relatively small part of entrepreneurs really innovate. Secondly, researchers reveal deep, but subtle, ties between the entrepreneurs’ profile, availability for innovation and effects on states’ competitiveness and prosperity. Finally, the number (or proportion) of entrepreneurs isn’t the most relevant, but their availability to innovate, the type of innovation chosen and, especially, how entrepreneurial organizations stimulate innovative initiatives among their employees (intrapreneurship). From this point of view, Romania's situation is difficult and challenging. The importance and size of the sector, entrepreneurial motivations, or the share of early stage innovative entrepreneurs indicate an average position at a global or European Union (EU) level. However, Romania is a modest innovator, often ranked last in the EU for a several innovation indicators, and its innovation performance in 2014 is at a significantly lower level compared to 2007. The poorest relative performance has been registered for the Linkages & entrepreneurship indicator. Our research also performs a comparison between entrepreneurship and innovation indicators, for Romania and selected Central and Eastern European states, to better understand the gap regarding a reasonable performance in innovation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: innovation, entrepreneurship, competitiveness, EU, Romania
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L26 - Entrepreneurship; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. and Carlsson, B. (2012) "Growth and entrepreneurship", Small Business Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 289–300.

Ahmad, N. and Hoffman, A. (2007) A Framework for Addressing and Measuring Entrepreneurship, Paris: OECD Entrepreneurship Indicators Steering Group.

Arrow, K. (1962) 'Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention', in Nelson, R. (ed). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Audretsch, D. (2005) "The emergence of entrepreneurial economics", Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 37-54.

Baumol, W. J. (1990) "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive", The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 5 (Part 1), pp. 893-921.

Castaño, M.-S., Méndez, M.-T. and Galindo, M.-A. (2016) "Innovation, internationalization and business-growth expectations among entrepreneurs in the services sector", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, pp. 1690–1695.

De Cleyn, S. and Braet, J. (2012) "Do board composition and investor type influence innovativeness in SMEs?" International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 285–308.

Dézsi-Benyovszki, A., Nagy, A. and Szabo, T.-P. (2014) Entrepreneurship In Romania. Country Report 2014, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.

Drucker, P. (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman Elsevier.

Drucker, P. (1998) "The discipline of innovation", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 149–157.

European Commission (1995) Green Paper on Innovation, COM (1995) 688, Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission (2015) Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs.

Fagerberg, J. (2003) Innovation: A Guide to the Literature. Ottawa, Workshop: The Many Guises of Innovation: What we have learnt and where we are heading.

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and World Economic Forum (2015) Leveraging Entrepreneurial Ambition and Innovation: A Global Perspective on Entrepreneurship, Competitiveness and Development, Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Gündoğdu, M. Ç. (2012) Re-Thinking Entrepreneurship, Intrapreneurship, and Innovation: A Multi-Concept Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences No. 41, pp. 296 – 303, International Conference on Leadership, Innovation and Technology Management.

Hatos, A., Hatos, R., Badulescu, A. and Badulescu, D. (2015) "Are Risk Attitudes and Individualism Predictors of Entrepreneurship in Romania?", Amfiteatru Economic, Vol. 17, No. 38, pp. 148-161.

Nicol, T. (2010) The Innovation Handbook, How to profit from your ideas, intellectual property, and market knowledge, Kogan Page.

Nicolov M., Badulescu A. (2012) “Regional Analysis of HR Involved in RDI Sector in Romania in the Last Decade”, Revista Economică, Supplement No. 1, pp. 554-563.

Noseleit, F. (2013) "Entrepreneurship, structural change, and economic growth", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 735–766.

OECD and EC (1997) Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: The Oslo Manual, Paris: OECD.

Rangone, A. (2016) "Corporate Psychology. How Does Italian Entrepreneurship Change?", Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 17-26.

Roberts, E. (1988) "Managing Invention and Innovation", Research Technology Management, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 11-29.

Schumpeter, J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

Sipos-Gug, S. and Badulescu, A. (2013) "Entrepreneurial Activity in Romania - A Time Series Clustering Analysis at the NUTS3 Level", The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences, Vol. XXII, No. 1, pp. 673 – 682.

Thiel, P. and Masters, B. (2014) Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future, New York: Crown Business.

Tont, D. and Tont, M. (2016) "An Overview of Innovation Sources in SMEs", Oradea Journal of Business and Economic, Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 58-67.

World Economic Forum (2014) The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015, Geneva: World Economic Forum.