Bornmann, Lutz and Butz, Alexander and Wohlrabe, Klaus (2017): What are the Top Five Journals in Economics? A New Meta–ranking.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79176.pdf Download (599kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We construct a meta–ranking of 277 economics journals based on 22 different rankings. The ranking incorporates bibliometric measures from four different databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and RePEc). We account for the different scaling of all bibliometric measures by standardizing each ranking score. We run a principal component analysis to assign weights to each ranking. In our meta–ranking the top five journals are given by: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Journal of Financial Economics, Journal of Economic Literature (JEL), Journal of Finance, and Econometrica. Additionally, leaving out the JEL as a survey journal and the finance journals in our top 10 we confirm the perceived top-5 journals in the economics profession.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What are the Top Five Journals in Economics? A New Meta–ranking |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | meta–ranking, Economics Journals, Aggregation, Citations, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, RePEc |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics |
Item ID: | 79176 |
Depositing User: | Klaus Wohlrabe |
Date Deposited: | 18 May 2017 04:43 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:06 |
References: | Archibald, R. and Finifter, D. (1990). Multivariate citations functions and journal rankings. Eastern Economic Journal, 16 (2), 151–158. Axarloglou, K. and Theoharakis, V. (2003). Diversity in economics: An analysis of journal quality perceptions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (6), 1402–1423. Bao, Y., Lo, M. and Mixon JR, F. (2010). General-interest versus specialty journals: Using intellectual influence of econometrics research to rank economics journals and articles. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25 (2), 345–353. Barrett, C., Olia, A. and Bailey, D. V. (2000). Subdiscipline-specific journal rankings: whither applied economics? Applied Economics, 32 (2), 239–252. Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G. and Kinouchi, O. (2006). Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68 (1), 179–189. Bennett, J., Johnson, M. and Germanis, P. (1980). An abstract approach to the relative ranking of economics journals. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business, 19 (2), 52–64. Berger, J. M. and Baker, C. M. (2014). Bibliometrics: An overview. RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4 (3), 81–92. Bergstrom, C., West, J. and Wiseman, M. (2008). The eigenfactor metrics. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28 (45), 11433. Billings, B. and Viksnins, G. (1972). The relative quality of economics journals: an alternative rating system. Economic Inquiry, 10 (4), 467–469. Bornmann, L., Marx, W., Gasparyan, A. Y. and Kitas, G. D. (2012). Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatology International, 32 (7), 1861–1867. Bräuninger, M. and Haucap, J. (2001). Was Ökonomen lesen und schätzen: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 2 (2), 185–210. Bräuninger, M., Haucap, J. and Muck, J. (2011). Was lesen und schätzen deutschsprachige ökonomen heute? Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 12 (4), 339–371. Burton, M. and Phimister, E. (1995). Core journals: A reappraisal of the diamond list. Economic Journal, 105 (429), 361–73. Bush, W., Hamelman, P. and Staaf, R. (1974). A quality index for economic journals. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (1), 123–125. Button, K. and Pearce, D. (1977). What british economists think of their journal. International Journal of Social Economics, 4 (3), 150–158. Card, D. and DellaVigna, S. (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51 (1), 144–61. Chang, C. and McAleer, M. (2011). What makes a great journal great in economics? the singer not the song. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25 (2), 326–361. Chang, C. and McAleer, M. and Oxley, L. (2011). Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics. Econometric Reviews, 30 (6), 583–619. Chang, C.-L., Maasoumi, E. and McAleer, M. (2016). Robust ranking of journal quality: An application to economics. Econometric Reviews, 35 (1), 50–97. Chang, C.-L., McAleer, M. and Oxley, L. (2011b). How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? an application to neuroscience. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38 (11), 2563–2573. Claassen, C. (2015). Measuring university quality. Scientometrics, 104 (3), 793–807. Coats, A. (1971). The role of scholarly journals in the history of economics: An essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 9 (1), 29–44. Combes, P.-P. and Linnemer, L. (2010). Inferring Missing Citations: A Quantitative Multi-Criteria Ranking of all Journals in Economics. Working Papers halshs-00520325, HAL. Costas, R. and Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1 (3), 193–203. Currie, R. and Pandher, G. (2011). Finance journal rankings and tiers: An active scholar assessment methodology. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35 (1), 7–20. de Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F., González-Molina, A. and Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Coverage analysis of scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73 (1), 53–78. Demange, G. (2014). A ranking method based on handicaps. Theoretical Economics, 9 (3), 915–942. Diamond, A. (1989). The core journals of economics. Current Contents, 21 (1), 4–11. Docampo, D. (2011). On using the shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems. Scientometrics, 86 (1), 77–92. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69 (1), 131–152. Elkins, M. R., Maher, C. G., Herbert, R. D., Moseley, A. M. and Sherrington, C. (2010). Correlation between the journal impact factor and three other journal citation indices. Scientometrics, 85 (1), 81–93. Engemann, K. and Wall, H. (2009). A journal ranking for the ambitious economist. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 91 (3), 127–139. Enomoto, C. and Ghosh, S. (1993). A stratified approach to the ranking of economics journals. Studies in Economics and Finance, 14 (2), 74–94. Expert Panel on Science Performance and Research Funding (2012). Informing research choices: Indicators and judgment. Ottawa, Canada: Council of Canadian Academies. Franceschet, M. (2009). A cluster analysis of scholar and journal bibliometric indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (10), 1950–1964. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122, 108–111. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295 (1), 90–93. Guerrero-Bote, V. P. and Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The sjr2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6 (4), 674–688. Haley, M. R. (2016). A ranking of journals for the aspiring health economist. Applied Economics, 48 (18), 1710–1718. Halkos, G. and Tzeremes, N. (2011). Measuring economic journals’ citation efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach. Scientometrics, 88 (3), 979–1001. Hamermesh, D. S. (2013). Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How? Journal of Economic Literature, 51 (1), 162–72. Hamermesh, D. S. (2015). Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts. NBER Working Papers 21754, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Harzing, A.-W. (2010). The publish or perish book. Tarma software research Melbourne. Harzing, A.-W. (2011). The publish or perish book. Tarma Software Research. Hawkins, R., Ritter, L. and Walter, I. (1973). What economists think of their journals. The Journal of Political Economy, 81 (4), 1017–1032. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 (46), 16569–16572. Hudson, J. (2013). Ranking Journals. Economic Journal, 123 (570), F202–F222. Kagann, S. and Leeson, K. (1978). Major journals in economics: a user study. Journal of Economic Literature, 16 (3), 979–1003. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. and Stengos, T. (2003). Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (6), 1346–1366. Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T. P. and Stengos, T. (2011). An updated ranking of academic journals in economics. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44 (4), 1525–1538. Koczy, L. A. and Strobel, M. (2010). The World Cup of Economics Journals: A Ranking by a Tournament Method. Working Paper Series 1011, Obuda University, Keleti Faculty of Economics. Kodrzycki, Y. and Yu, P. (2006). New approaches to ranking economics journals. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5 (1), 24. Kohlscheen, E. (2011). The Journal Rankings of Central Banks. Working Papers 11.05, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee, Working Paper 11.05. Laband, D. and Sophocleus, J. (1985). Revealed preference for economics journals: Citations as dollar votes. Public Choice, 46 (3), 317–324. Laband, D. N. (2013). On the Use and Abuse of Economics Journal Rankings. Economic Journal, 123 (570), F223–F254. Laband, D. N. and Piette, M. J. (1994). The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 32 (2), 640–66. Liebowitz, S. and Palmer, J. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 22 (1), 77–88. Liner, G. (2002). Core journals in economics. Economic Inquiry, 40 (1), 138–145. Liner, G. and Amin, M. (2004). Methods of ranking economics journals. Atlantic Economic Journal, 32 (2), 140–149. Lo, M. and Bao, Y. (2016). Are overall journal rankings a good mapping for article quality in specialty fields? Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 34 (1), 62–67. Malouin, J. and Francois Outreville, J. (1987). The relative impact of economics journals: A cross-country survey and comparison. Journal of Economics and Business, 39 (3), 267–277. McAllister, P., Narin, F. and Corrigan, J. (1983). Programmatic evaluation and comparison based on standardized citation scores. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 30, 205–211. McDonough, C. (1975). The relative quality of economics journals revisited. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 15 (1), 92–97. Meho, L. and Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 2105–2125. Michels, C. and Schmoch, U. (2012). The growth of science and database coverage. Scientometrics, 93 (3), 831–846. Mingers, J. and Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246 (1), 1–19. Mingers, J. and Lipitakis, E. (2010). Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management. Scientometrics, 85, 613–625. Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer Science & Business Media. Moore, W. J. (1972). The relative quality of economics journals: a suggested rating system. Economic Inquiry, 10 (2), 156–169. Neuhaus, C. and Daniel, H. (2008). Data sources for performing citation analysis: an overview. Journal of Documentation, 64 (2), 193–210. Norris, M. and Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1 (2), 161–169. Oltheten, E., Theoharakis, V. and Travlos, N. (2005). Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40 (1), 223–239. Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Martín-Martín, A. and López-Cózar, E. D. (2014). About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.6239. Ortega, F. J. and Gavilan, J. M. (2013). The measurement of production efficiency in scientific journals through stochastic frontier analysis models: Application to quantitative economics journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7 (4), 959–965. Ortega, J., Lopez-Romero, E. and Fernandez, I. (2011). Multivariate approach to classify research institutes according to their outputs: The case of the csic’s institutes. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (3), 323–332. Palacios-Huerta, I. and Volij, O. (2004). The measurement of intellectual influence. Econometrica, 72 (3), 963–977. Pieters, R. and Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2), 483–509. Pommerehne, W. (1986). Die reputation wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher fachzeitschriften: Ergebnisse einer befragung deutscher ökonomen. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 201 (3), 280–306. Pons-Novell, J. and Tirado-Fabregat, D. (2010). Is there life beyond the ISI Journal lists? The international impact of Spanish, Italian, French and German economics journals. Applied Economics, 42 (6), 689–699. Posner, R. (2000). An economic analysis of the use of citations in the law. American Law and Economics Review, 2 (2), 381–406. Pujol, F. (2008). Ranking journals following a matching model approach: An application to public economics journals. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10 (1), 55–76. Ramesh Babu, A. and Singh, Y. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43 (3), 309–329. Rath, K. and Wohlrabe, K. (2016). Recent trends in co-authorship in economics: evidence from repec. Applied Economics Letters, 23 (12), 897–902. Rath, K. and Wohlrabe, K. (2016). Trends in economics publications represented by jel categories between 2007 and 2013. Applied Economics Letters, 23 (9), 660–663. Ritzberger, K. (2008). A ranking of journals in economics and related fields. German Economic Review, 9, 402–430. Seiler, C. and Wohlrabe, K. (2012). Ranking economists on the basis of many indicators: An alternative approach using repec data. Journal of Informetrics, 6 (2), 389–402. Sidiropoulos, A., Katsaros, D. and Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Generalized hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72 (2), 253–280. Skeels, J. and Taylor, R. (1972). The relative quality of economics journals: an alternative rating system. Economic Inquiry, 10 (4), 470–473. Sommer, V. and Wohlrabe, K. (2017). Citations, journal ranking and multiple authorships reconsidered: evidence from almost one million articles. Applied Economics Letters, Forthcoming. Stern, D. I. (2013). Uncertainty measures for economics journal impact factors. Journal of Economic Literature, 51 (3), 838–859. Steward, M. and Lewis, B. (2010). A comprehensive analysis of marketing journal rankings. Journal of Marketing Education, 32 (1), 75–92. Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014). Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators. Thomson Reuters. Tüselmann, H., Sinkovics, R. R. and Pishchulov, G. (2015). Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings–a classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis. Omega, 51, 11–23. Vaio, G. D. and Weisdorf, J. L. (2010). Ranking economic history journals: a citation-based impact-adjusted analysis. Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, 4 (1), 1–17. Vana, L., Hochreiter, R. and Hornik, K. (2016). Computing a journal metaranking using paired comparisons and adaptive lasso estimators. Scientometrics, 106 (1), 229–251. Vieira, P. (2008). An economics journals ranking that takes into account the number of pages and co-authors. Applied Economics, 40 (7), 853–861. Vinkler, P. (2006). Composite scientometric indicators for evaluating publications of research institutes. Scientometrics, 68 (3), 629–642. Wall, H. (2009). Don’t get skewed over by journal rankings. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9 (1), 34. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N. and Visser, M. S. (2013). Some modifications to the snip journal impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 7 (2), 272–285. Wohlrabe, K. (2016). Taking the Temperature: A Meta-Ranking of Economics Journals. CESifo Working Paper 5726. Wouters, P., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., Rushforth, A. and Franssen, T. (2015). The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary report I to the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management). The Higher Education Funding Council for England. doi. Yin, C.-Y. (2011). Do impact factor, h-index and eigenfactor (tm) of chemical engineering journals correlate well with each other and indicate the journals’ influence and prestige? Current Science, 100 (5), 648–653. Zhang, C.-T. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One, 4 (5), e5429. Zimmermann, C. (2013). Academic rankings with repec. Econometrics, 1 (3), 249–280. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79176 |