Trofimov, Ivan (2017): Entrepreneurship and policy dynamics: a theoretical framework.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79497.pdf Download (243kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the current state of entrepreneurship theory in the public domain and proposes a theoretical framework applying the concepts of entrepreneurship developed by I. M. Kirzner and J. A. Schumpeter in the field of economics to the field of public policy. A distinction is made between political and policy entrepreneurship. Three generic policy entrepreneurship functions (policy leadership, innovation and coordination) which are performed by specific means by a variety of actors scattered across the policy system, are identified. It is shown that these entrepreneurial functions can provide a complete explanation of adjustments taking place during policy regime formation (including agenda setting and policy negotiation). It is postulated that during this process (denoted as policy equilibration), the complementarity of entrepreneurship functions is essential. The paper also considers possible exercise of policy entrepreneurship functions in the trade policy domain and examines what actors can act as entrepreneurs.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Entrepreneurship and policy dynamics: a theoretical framework |
English Title: | Entrepreneurship and policy dynamics: a theoretical framework |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Entrepreneurship; trade policy; agenda setting |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L26 - Entrepreneurship |
Item ID: | 79497 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Ivan D. Trofimov |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jun 2017 19:50 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 16:17 |
References: | Bloom J. (1987). Class, Race and the Civil Rights Movement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Boudreaux D. (1994). Schumpeter and Kirzner on Competition and Equilibrium. In Boettke P. J., Prychitko D. L. (eds.) The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar. Boyett I. (1997). The Public Sector Entrepreneur – A Definition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research; 3 (2), pp. 77-92. Buchanan J. M. (2004). The Status of the Status Quo. Constitutional Political Economy; 15 (2), pp. 133-144. Choi Y. B. (1995). The Entrepreneur: Schumpeter vs. Kirzner. In Boettke P. J., Rizzo M. J. (eds). Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 2, Part A. London: JAI Press. Dahmen E. (1988). Development Blocs in Industrial Economics. Scandinavian Economic History Review; 36 (1), pp. 3-14. Ebner A. (2006). Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and the Rationale of Government: An Outline of the Schumpeterian Theory of the State. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization; 59, 497-515. Endres A. M., Fleming G. A. (2002). International Organizations and the Analysis of Economic Policy, 1919-1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Endres A. M., Woods C. R. (2006). Modern Theories of Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Comparison and Appraisal. Small Business Economics; 26 (2), pp. 189-202. Esposito J. C. (1970). Vanishing Air: Ralph Nader’s Study Group on Air Pollution. New York: Grossman Publishers. Feld L. P., Schnellenbach J. (2007). Political Institutions and Policy Innovations: Theoretical Thoughts and Evidence on Labour Market Regulations. In Marciano A., Rosselin J.-M. (eds.) Democracy, Freedom and Coercion: A Law and Economics Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. François A. (2003). The Political Entrepreneur and the Coordination of the Political Process: A Market Process Perspective of the Political Market. The Review of Austrian Economics; 16 (2/3), pp. 153-168. Frohlich N., Oppenheimer J. A., Young O. R. (1971). Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hampson F. O., Hart M. (1995). Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons from Arms Control, Trade and Environment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Harberger A. C. (1993). Secrets of Success: A Handful of Heroes. American Economic Review; 83 (2), pp. 343-350. Kirchgässner G. (2002). On the Role of Heroes in Political and Economic Processes. Kyklos; 55 (2), pp. 179-196. Kirzner I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kirzner I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature; 35 (1), pp. 60-85. Kirzner I. M. (1997). How Markets Work: Disequilibrium, Entrepreneurship and Discovery. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs. Kirzner I. M. (1999). Creativity and/or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur. Review of Austrian Economics; 11 (1/2), pp. 5-17. Loasby B. J. (1982). The Entrepreneur in Economic Theory. Scottish Journal of Political Economy; 29 (3), pp. 220-241. Long O. (1985). Law and its Limitations in the GATT Multilateral Trade System. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. Lundwall B.-A. (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter. Meade J. (1988). A Proposal for an International Commercial Union. In Meade S. (ed). The Collected Papers of James Meade, Volume III: International Economics. London: Unwin Hyman. Mises L. (1996). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 4th Edition. San Francisco: Fox and Wilkes. Murphy R. D. (1971). Political Entrepreneurs and Urban Poverty. Massachusetts: Lexington Books. Ostrom E. (1964). Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management. Ph.D Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Price D. (1971). Professionals and Entrepreneurs: Staff Orientations and Policy Making on Three Senate Committees. Journal of Politics; May, 2, pp. 316-336. Roberts N. C., King P. J. (1989). Public Entrepreneurship: A Typology. Paper Presented to the Academy of Management Meetings, Public Sector Division. Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science; 13 (1), pp. 1-32. Schiller W. J. (1995). Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas. American Journal of Political Science; 39 (1), pp. 186-203. Schnellenbach J. (2007). Public Entrepreneurship and the Economics of Reform. Journal of Institutional Economics; 3(2), pp. 183-202. Schumpeter J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. Schumpeter J. A. (1942/1987). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 6th edition. London: Unwin. Sebenius J. K. (1984). Negotiating the Law of the Sea: Lessons in the Art and Science of Reaching Agreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Sheingate A. D. (2003). Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development. Studies in American Political Development; 17 (2), pp. 191-192. Shockley G. (2007). Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change: A Critique of Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago. Conference Proceedings, available at http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p211841_index.html. Slaughter A.-M. (1997). The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs; 76, p. 183. Tullock G. (1965). Entry Barriers in Politics. American Economic Review; 55 (2), pp. 458-466. Wagner R. E. (1966). Pressure Groups and Political Entrepreneurs: A Review Article. Papers on Non-Market Decision Making; 1 (1), pp. 161-170. Wawro G. (2000). Legislative Entrepreneurship in the US House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Winham G. (1977). Negotiation as a Management Process. World Politics; 30 (1), pp. 87-114. Wohlgemuth M. (2000). Political Entrepreneurship and Bidding for Political Monopoly. Journal of Evolutionary Economics; 10 (3), pp. 273-295. Yu T. F.-L. (2001). Towards a Theory of the Entrepreneurial State. International Journal of Social Economics; 28 (9), pp. 752-766. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79497 |