Makreshanska, Suzana and Petrevski, Goran (2016): Decentralization and fiscal performance in Central and Eastern Europe.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79630.pdf Download (422kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper provides empirical evidence on the association between decentralization and fiscal performance of the general government on a panel of 11 former transition countries during 1996-2012, controlling for the effects of various demographic, institutional, and macroeconomic variables. Also, for robustness check we make a comparison with a panel of 18 industrialized European economies. The main findings from the empirical investigation suggest that decentralizing government activities in Central and Eastern Europe leads to an increase in the efficiency in the provision of public goods. Also, we show that not only the extent of fiscal decentralization, but the composition of local revenue, too, matters for fiscal discipline. In these regards, providing local governments with higher autonomy in financing their activities by relying more on their “own” tax revenues instead of intergovernmental grants seems to be conducive with fiscal discipline. In contrast to the sample consisting of the former transition economies, we cannot find evidence on the association between decentralization and fiscal discipline in the developed European countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Decentralization and fiscal performance in Central and Eastern Europe |
English Title: | Decentralization and fiscal performance in Central and Eastern Europe |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fiscal decentralization, Budget deficits, Central and Eastern Europe, Panel data models |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H76 - State and Local Government: Other Expenditure Categories H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession |
Item ID: | 79630 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Goran Petrevski |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jun 2017 19:45 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:56 |
References: | Baltagi, Badi H. (2008), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (fourth edition). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. De Mello, L. R. (2000), “Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: a cross-country analysis”, World development, 28(2), pp. 365-380. Ebel, R. and Yilmaz, S. (2002), “On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 2809. Eyraud L., and Lusinyan L. (2013), Vertical fiscal imbalances and fiscal performance in advanced economies, Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(5), pp. 571-587. Grossman, J. P. (1989), “Fiscal Decentralization and government size: an extension”, Public Choice, 62(1), pp. 63-69. Grossman, J. P., and West, G. E. (1994), “Federalism and the growth of government: revisited”, Public Choice, 79(1-2), pp. 19-32. Hausman, J., A. (1978), “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46(6), pp. 1251-1271. Martinez-Vazquez, J. and McNab, R. M. (2003b), “Fiscal decentralization, macrostability and growth”, Papeles de trabajo del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Serie economía, Vol. 11, pp. 1-32. Neyapti, B. (2010), “Fiscal decentralization and deficits: International evidence”, European Journal of Political Economy, 26(2), pp. 155-166. Oates, W. E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Oates, W. E. (1991), “On the Nature and Measurement of Fiscal Illusion: A Survey”, in W.E. Oates, Studies in Fiscal Federalism, Edward Elgar, pp.431-448. Pereira, P. T., (2000), “Fiscal decentralization, public sector size and the wealth of nations”, Economia Publica Regional e Local, Coimbra. Prud'Homme, R. (1995), “The dangers of decentralization”, The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), pp. 201-220. Rodden, J. (2003), “Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government”, International Organization, 57(4), pp. 698-729. Rodden, J. and Wibbels, E. (2002), “Beyond the fiction of federalism: Macroeconomic management in multitiered systems”, World Politics, 54(4), pp. 494-531. Shah, A. (2004), “Fiscal decentralization in developing and transition economies: progress, problems, and the promise”, World Bank Policy Research Paper, No. 3282. Stein, Ernesto H. (1998), “Fiscal Decentralization and Government Size in Latin America”, Working Paper, Inter-American Development Bank, Office of the Chief Economist, No. 368. Thornton, Ј. (2007), “Further evidence on revenue decentralization and inflation”, Economics Letters, 95(1), pp. 140-145. Velasco A. (2000), “Debts and deficits with fragmented fiscal policymaking”, Journal of Public Economics, 76(1), pp. 105-125. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79630 |