Culture, Diffusion, and Economic Development: The Problem of Observational Equivalence

Harutyunyan, Ani and Özak, Ömer (2016): Culture, Diffusion, and Economic Development: The Problem of Observational Equivalence. Forthcoming in: Economics Letters

Abstract

This research explores the direct and barrier effects of culture on economic development. It shows both theoretically and empirically that whenever the technological frontier is at the top or bottom of the world distribution of a cultural value, there exists an observational equivalence between absolute cultural distances and cultural distances relative to the frontier, preventing the identification of its direct and barrier effects. Since the technological frontier usually has the ``right'' cultural values for development, it tends to be in the extremes of the distribution of cultural traits, generating observational equivalence and confounding the analysis. These results highlight the difficulty of disentangling the direct and barrier effects of culture. The empirical analysis finds suggestive evidence for direct effects of individualism and conformity with hierarchy, and barrier effects of hedonism.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Comparative economic development, cultural differences, barriers to technological diffusion, individualism, power distance, vertical hierarchy, hedonism, linguistic distance, genetic distance
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O20 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries; Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General

References

Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2010). The power of the family, Journal of Economic growth 15(2): 93– 125.

Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2014). Family ties, Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 2, Elsevier, pp. 177–215.

Andersen, T. B., Bentzen, J., Dalgaard, C.-J. and Sharp, P. (2013). Pre-reformation roots of the protestant ethic, Technical report, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).

Basso, A. and Cuberes, D. (2016). Deep-rooted determinants of the fertility transition across countries., Macroeconomic Dynamics .

Becker, S. O. and Woessmann, L. (2009). Was weber wrong? a human capital theory of protestant economic history, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(2): 531–596.

Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B. and Miller, D. L. (2011). Robust inference with multiway clustering, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 29(2).

Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Falk, A., Huffman, D. and Sunde, U. (2015). Patience and the wealth of nations.

Galor, O. and Özak, Ö. (2016). The agricultural origins of time preference, American Economic Review 106(10).

Giuliano, P. (2007). Living arrangements in western europe: Does cultural origin matter?, Journal of the European Economic Association 5(5): 927–952.

Gorodnichenko, Y. and Roland, G. (2016). Culture, institutions and the wealth of nations, Review of Economics and Statistics .

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes?, Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2): 23–48.

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3): 1095–1131.

Harutyunyan, A. and Özak, Ö . (2016). Culture, diffusion, and economic development, SMU Working Paper .

Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind : intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival, 3rd ed edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? a cross-country investigation, The Quarterly journal of economics pp. 1251–1288.

Spolaore, E. and Wacziarg, R. (2009). The diffusion of development, The Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics 124(2): 469–529.

Spolaore, E. and Wacziarg, R. (2012). Long-term barriers to the international diffusion of innovations, NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics, Vol. 8, JSTOR, pp. 11–46.

Spolaore, E. and Wacziarg, R. (2013). How deep are the roots of economic development?, Journal of Economic Literature 51(2): 325–369.

Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, Scribner, New York.

Zak, P. J. and Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth, The economic journal 111(470): 295–321