Gawlik, Remigiusz (2016): Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Published in: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Series, Vol. 594 , Vol. 594, No. Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership (1 January 2018): pp. 137-147.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80260.pdf Download (466kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper presents the results of ranking of the significance of quality of life determinants by University students that are starting professional activities. Research methodology: literature review; elaboration of an AHP decision-making model; two-stage expert selection; significance rankings by experts and a graphical and descriptive presentation of obtained results. Research sample: 14 experts out of almost 200 University students. Research outcome: a decision-making model that aims at maximizing the life satisfaction of future employees as a function of their individual assessments of significance of particular determinants of quality of life. Research implications: a more accurate adaptation to trends on the labor market and creation of new business models. Research limitation: narrowing the group of experts to University students. Value added of the research: better motivated employees with a satisfactory level of work-life balance will contribute to an increase of societal satisfaction level.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process |
English Title: | Encompassing the Work-Life Balance into Early Career Decision-Making of Future Employees Through the Analytic Hierarchy Process |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Analytic Hierarchy Process; determinants of quality of life; work-life balance; human resources; decision-making |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C44 - Operations Research ; Statistical Decision Theory D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration |
Item ID: | 80260 |
Depositing User: | Ph.D. Remigiusz Gawlik |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jul 2017 09:54 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 20:09 |
References: | 1. Smith, A.: The theory of moral sentiments. A. Millar, A. Kincaid & J. Bell, Strand, Edin-burgh (1759) 2. Learmonth, Y.C., Alwick, E.A., McAuley, E., Motl, R.W.: Quality of life and health-related QoL over 1 year in older women: monitoring stability and reliability of measurement. So-cial Indicators Research, 123(1), 267–279 (2015). DOI:10.1007/s11205-014-0729-0 3. Diener, E.D., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., Griffin, S.: The satisfaction with life scale. Jour-nal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75 (1985). DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 4. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C.R., Sandvik, E.: Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1), 149–161 (1991). DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17. 5. Lau, E.Y.Y., Cheung, S-H., Lam, J. Hui, C.H., Cheung, S-F., Mok, D.S.Y.: Purpose-driven life: life goals as a predictor of quality of life and psychological health. Journal of Happi-ness Studies, 16(5), 1163–1184 (2015). DOI:10.1007/s10902-014-9552-1 6. WHOQOL SRPB Group: A cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion, and personal be-liefs as components of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 62(6), 1486–1497 (2006). DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.001 7. Zuzanek, J.: Time use imbalances: developmental and emotional costs. In Matuska, K., Christiansen, C. (eds.) Life balance: biological, psychological and sociological perspectives on lifestyle and health, pp. 207–222. AOTA Press, Bethesda (2009). 8. Hansen, K.B.: Exploring compatibility between “subjective well-being” and “sustainable living” in Scandinavia. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 175–187 (2015). DOI:10.1007/s11205-014-0684-9 9. Maslow, A.: Motivation and personality. Harper, New York (1954) 10. Abel-Smith, B., Townsend, P.: The poor and the poorest. Occasional Papers on Social Administration 17, Bell & Sons, London (1965) 11. Graafland, J., Compen, B.: Economic freedom and life satisfaction: mediation by income per capita and generalized trust. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(3), 789–810 (2015). DOI:10.1007/s10902-014-9534-3 12. Atkinson, A.B.: The Economics of inequality (2nd ed). Clarendon Press, Oxford (1983) 13. Atkinson, A.B.: Multidimensional deprivation: contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality 1, 51–65 (2003) 14. Sen, A.K.: Personal utilities and public judgements: or what's wrong with welfare econom-ics? Economic Journal 89(355), 537–558 (1979) 15. Sen, A.K.: Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1985) 16. Sen, A.K.: Inequality reexamined. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1992) 17. Sen, A.K.: Capability and wellbeing. In: Nussbaum, M., Sen, A.K. (eds.), The Quality of Life, pp. 30–53. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993) 18. Sen, A.K.: Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999) 19. Schuessler, K.F., Fisher, G.A.: Quality of Life Research and Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 11, 129–149 (1985). DOI:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001021 20. Layard, R.: Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Penguin Press, New York (2005) 21. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J-P. (eds.): Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. CMEPSP, Paris (2009) 22. Alkire, S., Foster, J.: Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics 95, 476–487 (2011) 23. Ulman, P., Šoltés, E. : The monetary and non-monetary aspects of poverty in Poland and Slovakia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 3(1), 61–73 (2015). DOI:10.15678/EBER.2015.030105 24. Şerban-Oprescu, G.: Economic approaches to sustainability and quality of life – an episte-mological study. The Romanian Economic Journal 46 bis, 79–96 (2012) 25. Simkins, T.J., Peterson, M.: Assessing the value of a societal-level sustainability index for macromarketing research. Journal of Macromarketing 36(1), 78–95 (2016). DOI:10.1177/0276146715586834. 26. Chang, J., Travaglione, A., O’Neill, G.: How can gender signal employee qualities in retail-ing? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 27, 24–30 (2015). DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.07.004. 27. Tang, Y., Hornung, S.: Work-family enrichment through I-Deals: evidence from Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology 30(8), 940–954 (2015). DOI:10.1108/JMP-02-2013-0064 28. Adame, C., Caplliure, E-M., Miquel, M-J.: Work–life balance and firms: a matter of wom-en? Journal of Business Research 69(4), 1379–1383 (2016). DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.111. 29. Ren, X., Caudle, D.: Walking the tightrope between work and non-work life: strategies employed by British and Chinese academics and their implications. Studies in Higher Edu-cation 41(4), 599–618 (2016). DOI:10.1080/03075079.2014.942277 30. Russo, M., Shteigman, A., Carmeli, A.: Workplace and family support and work–life bal-ance: implications for individual psychological availability and energy at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology 11(2), 173–188 (2016). DOI:10.1080/17439760.2015.1025424 31. Zheng, C., Kashi, K., Fan, D., Molineux, J., Shan Ee, M.: Impact of individual coping strat-egies and organisational work–life balance programmes on Australian employee well-being. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 27(5), 501–526 (2016). DOI:10.1080/09585192.2015.1020447 32. Gawlik, R. Jacobsen, G.: Work-life balance decision-making of norwegian students: impli-cations for human resources management. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 4(4), 153–170 (2016). DOI:10.15678/EBER.2016.040410 33. Żur, A.: Social problems as sources of opportunity: antecedents of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(4), 73–87 (2015). DOI:10.15678/EBER.2015.030405 34. Neumark, D., Muz, J.: The “business climate” and economic inequality. Review of Income and Wealth 62(1), 161–180 (2016). DOI:10.1111/roiw.12146 35. Somarriba Arechavala, N., Zarzosa Espina, P., Pena Trapero, B.: The economic crisis and its effects on the quality of life in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 323–343 (2015). DOI:10.1007/s11205-014-0595-9 36. Sałabun, W.: Reduction in the number of comparisons required to create matrix of expert judgment in the COMET method. Management and Production Engineering Review 5(3), 62–69 (2014). DOI:10.2478/mper-2014-0028 37. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M.: Multicriteria decision systems for financial problems. TOP 21(2), 241–261 (2013). DOI:10.1007/s11750-013-0279-7 38. Rezaei, J.: Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57 (2015). DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009 39. Ivlev, I., Vacek, J., Kneppo, P.: Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 247, 216–228 (2015). DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.075 40. Durbach, I.N., Stewart, T.J.: Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. Euro-pean Journal of Operational Research 223(1), 1–14 (2012). DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038 41. Teixeira de Almeida, A., Araujo de Almeida, J., Cabral Seixas Costa, A.P., Teixeira de Almeida-Filho, A.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational Research 250, 179–191 (2016). DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058 42. Ben Amor, S., Jabeur, K., Martel, J-M.: Multiple criteria aggregation procedure for mixed evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research 181, 1506–1515 (2007). DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.048 43. Pomerol, J.C., Barba-Romero, S.: Multicriterion decision in management: principles and practice. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 25, Springer, New York (2000) 44. Cabello, J.M., Luque, M., Miguel, F., Ruiz, A.B., Ruiz, F.: A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain). TOP 22(1), 109–127 (2014). DOI:10.1007/s11750-011-0236-2 45. Varmazyar, M., Dehghanbaghi, M., Afkhami, M.: A novel hybrid MCDM model for per-formance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Evaluation and Program Planning 58, 125–140 (2016). DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005 46. Gawlik, R.: Methodological Aspects of qualitative-quantitative analysis of decision-making processes. Management and Production Engineering Review 7(2), 3–11 (2016). DOI:10.1515/mper-2016-0011 47. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980) 48. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1999) 49. Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria decision making. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1996) 50. Gawlik, R.: The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to analyse international corporations’ operating environment. Cracow Review of Economics and Management 891, 19–30 (2012) 51. Belton, V., Gear, A.E.: On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Ome-ga, 11(3), 228–230 (1983) 52. Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36(3), 249–258 (1990) 53. Barzilai, J.: Notes on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Proceedings of the 2001 NSF Design, Service & Manufacturing Grantees & Research Conference, pp. 1–6. NSF, Tampa (2001) 54. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L., Whitaker, R.: Addressing with brevity criticism of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1(2), 121–134 (2009). DOI: 10.13033/ijahp.v1i2.53 55. Gawlik, R.: Material and non-material determinants of European youth’s life quality. In: Delener, N., Fuxman, L., Lu, F.V., Rodrigues, S., Rivera, L.E. (eds.) Globalizing business-es for the next century: visualizing and developing contemporary approaches to harness fu-ture opportunities, pp. 339–346. GBATA, New York (2013) 56. Gawlik, R., Titarenko, R., Titov, S.: Perception of quality of life and its components be-tween russian students and its implications for university lecturers. Horizons of Politics 6(16), 127–150 (2015). DOI:10.17399/HP.2015.061606 57. Gawlik, R.: Stratification of research target group and selection of experts for AHP-based decision making model (Stratyfikacja próby badawczej i dobór ekspertów na przykładzie modelu decyzyjnego opartego na metodzie AHP, in Polish). Studia i Materiały "Miscella-nea Oeconomicae", 20(3), 193–200 (2016) 58. Newman, A., Nielsen, I., Smyth, R., Hooke, A.: Examining the relationship between work-place support and life satisfaction: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 769–781 (2015). DOI:10.1007/s11205-014-0613-y |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80260 |