Colignatus, Thomas (2017): Two conditions for the application of Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient to voting and allocated seats.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80297.pdf Download (390kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient are applied here to measure and graph disproportionality in outcomes for multiseat elections held in 2017. The discussion compares Proportional Representation (PR) in Holland (PR Gini 3.6%) with District Representation (DR) in France (41.6%), UK (15.6%) and Northern Ireland (NI) (36.7%). In France the first preferences of voters for political parties show from the first round in the two rounds run-off election. In UK and NI the first preferences of voters are masked because of strategic voting in the single round First Past the Post system. Thus the PR Gini values for UK and NI must be treated with caution. Some statements in the voting literature hold that the Lorenz and Gini statistics are complex to construct and calculate for voting. Instead, it appears that the application is actually straightforward. These statistics appear to enlighten the difference between PR and DR, and they highlight the disproportionality in the latter. Two conditions are advised to enhance the usefulness of the statistics and the comparability of results: (1) Order the political parties on the ratio (rather than the difference) of the share of seats to the share of votes, (2) Use turnout as the denominator for the shares, and thus include the invalid and wasted vote (no seats received) as a party of their own. The discussion also touches upon the consequences of disproportionality by DR. Quite likely Brexit derives from the UK system of DR and the discontent about (mis-) representation. Likely voting theorists from countries with DR have a bias towards DR and they are less familiar with the better democratic qualities of PR.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Thomas Cool Consultancy & Econometrics |
Original Title: | Two conditions for the application of Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient to voting and allocated seats |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | General Economics, Social Choice, Social Welfare, Election, Majority Rule, Parliament, Legislative, Party System, Representation, Proportion, District, Voting, Seat, Equity, Inequality, Lorenz, Gini coefficient, Voting Paradox, Arrow's Impossibility Theorem |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior |
Item ID: | 80297 |
Depositing User: | Thomas Colignatus |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2017 08:57 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 19:21 |
References: | PM 1. Colignatus is the name in science of Thomas Cool, econometrician and teacher of mathematics, Scheveningen, Holland, http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pco170.htm PM 2. This article is an edit of Colignatus (2017acgh). PM 3. The excel sheet for a country / year contains an unsorted section and a section that sorts automatically. The data, calculations and charts are in: excl. of France https://boycottholland.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/2015-2017-uk-holland-nireland-lorenz-gini.xls for France: https://boycottholland.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/2017-france-lorenz-gini1.xls Butler, D. (2014), "The Evolution of British Electoral Studies", lecture, http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes-impact/the-evolution-of-british-electoral-studies-by-david-butler/ Chessa, M. (2012), "A note on “Measurement of disproportionality in proportional representation systems", Mathematical and Computer Modelling Volume 55, Issues 3–4, February 2012, Pages 1655-1660, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717711005589 Colignatus, Th. (2010), "Single vote multiple seats elections. Didactics of district versus proportional representation, using the examples of the United Kingdom and The Netherlands", https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22782/ Colignatus, Th. (2014), "Voting Theory for Democracy", Thomas Cool Consultancy & Econometrics, https://zenodo.org/record/291985 Colignatus, Th. (2017a), " The Dutch general elections of March 15 2017", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/03/26/the-dutch-general-elections-of-march-15-2017/ Colignatus, Th. (2017b), "The performance of four possible rules for selecting the Prime Minister after the Dutch Parliamentary elections of March 2017", https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77616/ Colignatus, Th. (2017c), "Proportional representation, Lorenz diagram and Gini measure", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/06/22/proportional-representation-lorenz-diagram-and-gini-measure/ Colignatus, Th. (2017d), "Also Scotland doesn’t understand democracy", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/06/21/also-scotland-doesnt-understand-democracy/ Colignatus, Th. (2017e), "Voting theory and the Brexit referendum question", RES Newsletter, issue 177, April, p14-15, http://www.res.org.uk/view/art4Apr17Features.html Colignatus, Th. (2017f), "A puzzle on YouGov Brexit ranking data", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/a-puzzle-on-yougov-brexit-ranking-data/ Colignatus, Th. (2017g), "Brexit and the weird brew of populism and district representation", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/brexit-and-the-weird-brew-of-populism-and-district-representation/ Colignatus, Th. (2017h), "Lorenz en Gini for the French elections of 2017", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/07/19/lorenz-en-gini-for-the-french-elections-of-2017/ Colignatus, Th. (2017i), "Questioning Brexit doesn’t mean questioning the UK Parliament mandate", https://boycottholland.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/questioning-brexit-doesnt-mean-questioning-the-uk-parliament-mandate/ Karpov, A. (2008), "Measurement of disproportionality in proportional representation systems", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Volume 48, Issues 9–10, November 2008, Pages 1421-1438, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717708001933 Kedar, O., L. Harsgor and R.A. Sheinerman (2013), " Are Voters Equal under Proportional Representation?", http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/pspe28112013.pdf Kestelman, P. (2005), "Apportionment and Proportionality: A Measured View", Voting Matters, 20, p 12-22, http://www.votingmatters.org.uk/ISSUE20/I20P4.PDF Renwick, A. (2015), " Electoral Disproportionality: What Is It and How Should We Measure It?", http://blogs.reading.ac.uk/readingpolitics/2015/06/29/electoral-disproportionality-what-is-it-and-how-should-we-measure-it/ Schendelen, M.P.C.M. van (1985), "Consociational Democracy: The Views of Arend Lijphart and Collected Criticisms", Political Science Reviewer, Fall, 1985 - Vol. 15, No. 1, p143-183, https://isistatic.org/journal-archive/pr/15_01/schendelen.pdf Stavrou, P. (2017), "Brexit and the choice between Parliaments or Populism with referenda. Interview with Thomas Colignatus", https://protesilaos.com/colignatus-brexit-referenda-interview/ Taagepera, R. and M.S. Shugart (1989), "Seats and Votes", Yale Tailor, A. and N. Veron (2014), "How unequal is the European Parliament’s representation?", http://voxeu.org/article/inequality-european-parliament-representation |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80297 |