Lee, Sang-Ho and Xu, Lili (2017): Endogenous timing in private and mixed duopolies with emission taxes.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80342.pdf Download (289kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines an endogenous timing game in product differentiated duopolies under price competition when emission tax is imposed on environmental externality. We show that a simultaneous-move (sequential-move) outcome can be an equilibrium outcome in a private duopoly under significant (insignificant) environmental externality, but this result can be reversed in a mixed duopoly. We also show that when environmental externalities are significant, public leadership yields greater welfare than private leadership, and that public leadership is more robust than private leadership as an equilibrium outcome. Finally, we find that privatization can result in a public leader becoming a private leader, but this worsens welfare.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Endogenous timing in private and mixed duopolies with emission taxes |
English Title: | Endogenous timing in private and mixed duopolies with emission taxes |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Emission tax; Endogenous timing; Mixed duopoly; Private duopoly |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 80342 |
Depositing User: | Professor Sang-Ho Lee |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jul 2017 16:27 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 07:35 |
References: | Amir R, De Feo G (2014) Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly. International Journal of Game Theory 43: 629-658. Blogh TL, Tasnádi A (2012) Does timing of decisions in a mixed duopoly matter?. Journal of Economics 106: 233-249. Bárcena-Ruiz JC (2007) Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition. Journal of Economics 91: 263-272. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2006) Mixed oligopoly and environmental policy. Spanish Economic Review 8: 139-160. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2010) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with semipublic firms. Portuguese Economic Journal 9: 97-113. Beladi H, Chao CC (2006) Does privatization improve the environment?. Economics Letters 93: 343-347. Capuano C, De Feo G (2010) Privatization in oligopoly: the impact of the shadow cost of public funds. Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti 15: 175-208. Cato S (2008) Privatization and the environment. Economics Bulletin 12: 1-10. Clo S, Ferraris M, Florio M (2016) Ownership and environmental regulation: evidence from the European electricity industry. Energy Economics DOI:10.1016/j.eneco. Din HR, Sun CH (2016) Combining the endogenous choice of timing and competition version in a mixed duopoly. Journal of Economics 118: 141-166. Fjell K, Heywood JS (2004) Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firm's moves: the relevance of privatization. Economics Letters 83: 411-416. Hamilton JH, Slutsky SM (1990) Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior 2: 29-46. Heywood JS, Ye G (2009) Privatisation and timing in a mixed oligopoly with both foreign and domestic firms. Australian Economic Papers 48: 320-332. Lu Y (2006) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors: the linear demand case. Journal of Economics 88: 49-68. Lu Y, Poddar S (2009) Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly and private duopoly –‘capacity-then-quantity’ game: the linear demand case. Australian Economic Papers 48: 138-150. Matsumura T, Ogawa A (2010) On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly. Australian Economic Papers 49: 149-160. Matsumura T, Ogawa A (2014) Corporate social responsibility or payoff asymmetry? A study of an endogenous timing game. Southern Economic Journal 81: 457-473. Naya JM (2015) Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly model. Journal of Economics 116: 165-174. Ohori S (2006) Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. Journal of Regulatory Economics 29: 225-233. Pal D (1998) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 61: 181-185. Pal R, Saha B (2014) Mixed duopoly and environment. Journal of Public Economic Theory 16: 96-118. Pal R, Saha B (2015) Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment. Resource and Energy Economics 40: 19-35. Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND Journal of Economics 15: 546-554. Tomaru Y, Kiyono K (2009). 'Endogenous timing in mixed duopoly with increasing marginal costs', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166: 591-613. Wang LFS, Wang J (2009) Environmental taxes in a differentiated mixed duopoly. Economic Systems 33: 389-396. Xu L, Cho S, Lee SH (2016) Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot–Bertrand comparison. Economic Modelling 55: 73-82. Xu L, Lee SH (2015) Strategic privatization with tariffs and environmental taxes in an international mixed duopoly. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 56: 135-154. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80342 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Endogenous timing in private and mixed duopolies with emission taxes. (deposited 26 Jul 2017 16:27) [Currently Displayed]