Regional integration, sectoral adjustments and natural groupings in East Asia

Lee, Hiro and van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique (2008): Regional integration, sectoral adjustments and natural groupings in East Asia. Published in: International Journal of Applied Economics , Vol. 5, No. 2 (September 2008): pp. 57-79.

Abstract

Although East Asian countries were relatively inactive in signing free trade agreements (FTAs) until the end of 1990s, a number of FTAs involving East Asian countries have been signed since the turn of the century. The objective of this study is to compare welfare gains and sectoral adjustments resulting from various FTA scenarios in East Asia using a dynamic global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. The RCA rankings of commodities with various FTA scenarios and those with the global trade liberalization are correlated to examine how “natural” each grouping would be. The results suggest that the ASEAN+3 FTA, with relatively large welfare gains and small structural adjustments, could be a facilitating intermediate step towards global free trade. Some of the smaller FTAs, such as the ASEAN-China and ASEAN-Korea FTAs, would result in large structural adjustments for ASEAN countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Regional integration, FTA, RCA, East Asia, CGE model
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

References

Andreosso-O'Callaghan, B. and F. Nicolas. 2007. Are the Economies of ASEAN and the EU Complementary? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 24, 205-224.

Balassa, B. 1965. Trade Liberalization and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage, Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 23, 99-123.

Bhagwati, J. 1995. U.S. Trade Policy: The Infatuation with Free Trade Areas, In J. Bhagwati and A. O. Krueger (Eds), The Dangerous Drift to Preferential Trade Agreements, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

Brown, D. K., A. V. Deardorff, and R. M. Stern. 2003. Multilateral, Regional, and Bilateral Trade-Policy Options for the United States and Japan, World Economy, 26, 803-828.

Das, S., M. J. Roberts, and J. R. Tybout. 2001. Market Entry Costs, Producer Heterogeneity, and Export Dynamics, NBER Working Paper No. 8629, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

de Melo, J. and S. Robinson. 1990. Productivity and Externalities: Models of Export-Led Growth, Policy Research Working Paper No. 387, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Dee, P. 2007. East Asian Economic Integration and Its Impact on Future Growth, World Economy, 30, 405-423.

Dessus, S., K. Fukasaku, and R. Safadi. 1999. Multilateral Tariff Liberalization and the Developing Countries, OECD Development Centre Policy Brief, No. 18, Paris: OECD.

Dimaranan, B. V. (Ed). 2006. Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 6 Data Base, West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

Ethier, W. 1998. The New Regionalism, Economic Journal, 108, 1149-1161.

Feridhanusetyawan, T. 2005. Preferential Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region, IMF Working Paper WP/05/149, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Frankel, J. A., E. Stein, and S.-J. Wei. 1995. Trading Blocs and the Americas: The Natural, the Unnatural, and the Super-Natural, Journal of Development Economics, 47, 61-95.

Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. J. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fukase, E. and L. A. Winters. 2003. Possible Dynamic Effects of AFTA for the New Member Countries, World Economy, 26, 853-871.

Helpman, E. and P. R. Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kahler, M. 1995. International Institutions and the Political Economy of Integration, Washington DC: Brookings Institution.

Kawai, M. 2005. East Asian Economic Regionalism: Progress and Challenges, Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 29-55.

Keuschnigg, C. and W. Kohler. 2002. Eastern Enlargement of the EU: How Much Is It Worth for Austria? Review of International Economics, 10, 324-342.

Kreinin, M. E. and M. G. Plummer. 1994a. Structural Change and Regional Integration in East Asia, International Economic Journal, 8(2), 1-12.

Kreinin, M. E. and M. G. Plummer. 1994b. ‘Natural’ Economic Blocs: An Alternative Formulation, International Trade Journal, 8, 193-205.

Krueger, A. O. 1999. Are Preferential Trading Arrangements Trade-Liberalizing or Protection￢ist? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 105-125.

Langhammer, R. J. 2004. China and the G-21: A New North-South Divide in the WTO after Cancun, Kiel Working Paper No. 1194, Kiel Institute for World Economics.

Lee, H., D. Roland-Holst, and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 2004. China’s Emergence in East Asia under Alternative Trading Arrangements, Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 697-712.

Lee, H. and D. van der Mensbrugghe. 2005. Interactions between Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in a General Equilibrium Framework, Paper presented at the ADB Experts' Meeting on Long-term Scenarios of Asia’s Growth and Trade, Asian Development Bank, Manila, 10-11 November.

Lee, J.-W. and I. Park. 2005. Free Trade Areas in East Asia: Discriminatory or Non-discriminatory? World Economy, 28, 21-48.

Lloyd, P. J. and D. MacLaren. 2004. Gains and Losses from Regional Trading Agreements: A Survey, Economic Record, 80, 445-467.

Madsen, A. D. and M. L. Sorensen. 2002. Economic Consequences for Denmark of EU Enlargement, Paper presented at the International Conference on Policy Modeling, Brussels, 4-6 July.

Panagariya, A. 1999a. Regionalism in Trade Policy: Essays on Preferential Trading, London: World Scientific.

Panagariya, A. 1999b. The Regionalism Debate: An Overview, World Economy, 22, 477-511.

Panagariya, A. 2000. Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Development, Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 287-331.

Park, I. 2006. East Asian Regional Trade Agreements: Do They Promote Global Free Trade? Pacific Economic Review, 11, 547-568.

Sally, R. 2007. Thai Trade Policy: From Non-discriminatory Liberalisation to FTAs, World Economy, 30, 1594-1620.

Samuelson, P. A. 1952. The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs: The Terms of Trade when Impediments are Absent, Economic Journal, 62, 278-304.

Schiff, M. and A. Winters. 2003. Regional Integration and Development, New York: Oxford University Press.

Scollay, R. and J. Gilbert. 2001. New Subregional Trading Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

Srinivasan, T. N. 1998a. Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: From GATT to the Uruguay Round and the Future, Boulder: Westview Press.

Srinivasan, T. N. 1998b. Regionalism and the WTO: Is Nondiscrimination Passe? In: A. O. Krueger (Ed), The WTO as an International Organization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tran, V. H. 2005. New Asian Regionalism: Evidence on the Impact of the ASEAN+3 Free Trade Agreement on Its Member Countries, Journal of Quantitative Economics, New Series, 3(2), 98-109.

Urata, S. and K. Kiyota. 2003. The Impacts of an East Asia FTA on Foreign Trade in East Asia, NBER Working Paper No. 10173, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

van der Mensbrugghe, D. 2005. LINKAGE Technical Reference Document: Version 6.0, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Wong, K.-Y., T.-D. Yeo, Y. M. Yoon, and S. Yun. 2004. Northeast Asia Economic Integration: An Analysis of the Trade Relations among China, Japan, and South Korea, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Washington.

World Bank. 2000. Trade Blocs, Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Trade Organization. 1995. Regionalism and the World Trading System, Geneva: World Trade Organization.

Zhai, F. 2006. Preferential Trade Agreements in Asia: Alternative Scenarios of "Hub and Spoke," ERD Working Paper Series No. 83, Manila: Asian Development Bank.