Halkos, George and Matsiori, Steriani and Dritsas, Sophoclis (2017): Exploring social values for marine protected areas: The case of Mediterranean monk seal.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_82490.pdf Download (410kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study primarily attempts to understand people’s beliefs towards marine protected areas considering as a case study the National Marine Park of Alonissos, Northern Sporades (NMPANS) in Greece. Specifically, it aims to identify people’s opinion about the utility of the park investigating also their beliefs in relation to socio-economic characteristics. For this reason, a face-to-face survey of 200 respondents randomly selected residents of Volos was carried out. The research was structured according to the principles of the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). According to the survey results, the majority of responders recognized the contribution of the Park to preserve the monk seal and the natural environment. Moreover, they want to maintain the park and specialise in the area of protection measures.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Exploring social values for marine protected areas: The case of Mediterranean monk seal |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Marine Park; CVM; WTP; Mediterranean monk seal; Socio-economic values; Environmental attitudes. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 82490 |
Depositing User: | G.E. Halkos |
Date Deposited: | 08 Nov 2017 00:07 |
Last Modified: | 06 Oct 2019 03:58 |
References: | Aaker D, Kumer V. Day G., 2009, Marketing Research. 10th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 755. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R., Schuman H., 1993, Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register. 58(10), 4601-4614. Bhandari A.K., Heshmati A., 2010, Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation. J. Travel Res.Tour Mark. 27(6), 612–623. Böhnke-Henrichs A., Baulcomb C., Koss R., Hussain S.S. de Groot R.S., 2013, Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management. J. Environ. Manage.130, 135-145. Bowker J.M., Newman D.H., Warren R.J., Henderson D., 2002, Estimating the Economic Value of Lethal Versus Nonlethal Deer Control in Suburban Communities. Soc Nat Resour 16(2):143-158. Boyle K., 2003, Contingent valuation in practice, in P. Champ, K. Boyle and T. Brovvn (eds). A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Boslon, MA: Kluwer Academic, pp. 111-70. Brennan D., Tapsuwan S., and Ingram G., 2007, The welfare costs of urban outdoor water restrictions. Aust J Agr Resour Ec, 51, 243–261. Carson R., Flores N., Meade N., 2001, Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Res Econ. 19, 173-210. Carson R.T., N. Flores, Hanemann M., 1998, Sequencing and Valuing Public Goods. J. Environ. Manage. 36, 314-323. Carson R.T., Groves T. 2007, Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ. Resour. Econ., 37, 181-210. Choi A.S., Fielding K.S., 2013, Environmental attitudes as WTP predictors: a case study involving endangered species. Ecol. Econ.89, 24–32. Clark C.F., Kotchen M.J., Moore M.R., 2003, Internal and external influences on pro–environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. J Env Psychol. 23, 237–246. Cooper P., Poe G.L., Bateman I.J. 2004. The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement. Eco Econ, 50(1-2):69-82. De Groot R.S., 1992, Functions of nature. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Wolters-Noordhoff. Dunlap R., Van Liere K., Mertig A., Catton W., Howell R., 1992, Measuring endorsement of an ecological worldview: a revised NEP scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, August, and at the Sixth Meeting of the Society for Human Ecology at Snowbird, UT, October. Dunlap R.E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig AG., Jones R.E., 2000, Measuring endorsement of the new environmental paradigm: A revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues. 56, 425–442. Flachaire E. and Hollard G., 2007. “Starting point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Starting point bias and respondent uncertainty in dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys.” Resour. Energy Econ. 29 (3), 183–194. Hair J.E., Anderson, R.E. Tatham, R.L., Black W.C., 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. Halkos E.G., Jones N., 2012, Modeling the effect of social factors on improving biodiversity protection. Ecol Econ, 78(C), 90-99. Halkos G.E., 2006, Econometrics: Theory and practice. Giourdas Publications. Halkos G.E., 2011, Econometrics: Theory and practice: Instructions in using Eviews, Minitab, SPSS and excel Gutenberg: Athens. Halkos G.E., Matsiori S., 2016, Determining public attitudes and willingness-to-pay for artificial lakes protection. Water Res. Econ., 15: 15-27. Halkos G.E., Matsiori S., 2017, Environmental attitude, motivations and values for marine biodiversity protection. J Behav. Exp. Econ., 69: 61-70. Hanemann M., 1989, Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: reply. Am J Agr Econ, 71, 1057–1061. Hanley N., Shogren J.F., White B., 1997, Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Hawcroft L.J., Milfont T.L., 2010. The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 30(2): 143-158. Hellenic Society for the Study and protection of the Monk Seal, 1995, Continuation of the Monitoring of the Monk Seals in the National Marine Park of Northern Sporades. Final Report for the European Commission Project 4-3010(92)7829. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S., 1989, Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons. 307 pp. Hough J. L., 1988, Obstacles to effective management of conflicts between national parks and surrounding human communities in the developing countries, Environ Conserv. 15, 129–136. Hough J. L., Sherpa M.N., 1989, Bottom up vs. basic needs: integrated conservation and development in the Annapurna and Michiru Mountain conservation area of Nepal and Malawi. Ambio 18, 434–441. Jacobsen J.B., Hanley N. 2009, Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation? Env. Res. Econ. 43, 137–160. Johnson W.M., Karamanlidis A.A., Dendrinos P., De Larrinoa P.F., Gazo M., Gonzalez l.M., Guecluesoy H., Pires R., Schnellmann M., 2006, Monk seal fact files: Biology, behaviour, status and conservation of the Mediterranean monk seal, Monachus monachus. The Monachus Guardian. Retrieved 1 December 2011 from www.monachus-guardian.org/factfiles/medit01.htm. Justus J., Colyvan H., Regan M., Maguire L., 2009, Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24,187–191. Kaiser H., 1974, An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39, 31-36. Kaval P., Stithou M., Scarpa R., 2009, Social Values of Biodiversity Conservation for the Endangered Loggerhead Turtle and Monk Seal. Int J Ecol Stat. 14, 67-76. Kontogianni A, Langford IH, Papandreou A, Skourtos MS., 2003, Social preferences for improving water quality: an economic analysis of benefits from wastewater treatment. Water Resour. Manag. 17, 317- 336. Kontogianni A., Skourtos M.S., Langford I.H., Bateman I.J., Georgiou S, 2001, Integrating stakeholder analysis in non-market valuation of environmental assets. Ecol Econ. 37, 123-138. Kontogianni C., Tourkolias A., Machleras, Skourtos M., 2012, Service providing units, existence values and the valuation of endangered species: A methodological test. Ecol Econ 79: 97–104. Kotchen M.J., Reiling S.D., 1999, Do reminders of substitutes and budget constraints influence contingent valuation estimates? Another comment. Land Econ 73(3): 478-482. Kotchen M.J., Reiling S.D., 2000, Environmental attitudes motivations and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species. Ecol Econ. 32, 93–107. Kottapalli S.R., Rakesh K.M., Krishna G.S., 2003, Local People’s Knowledge, Aptitude and Perceptions of Planning and Management Issues in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India, Env Manag. 31 (2): 168–181. Kyle G.T., Graefe A.R., Absher J.D., 2002, Determining appropriate prices for recreation on public lands. J. Park Recreation Admin., 20, 69–89. Langford I.H., Kontogianni A., Skourtos M.S., Georgiou S., Bateman I.J., 1998. Multivariate mixed models for openended contingent valuation data: willingness to pay for conservation of monk seals, Env. Res. Econ. 12, 443–456. Langford I.H., Skourtos M.S., Kontogianni A., Day R.J., Georgiou S., Bateman I.J., 2001, Use and nonuse values for conserving endangered species: the case of the Mediterranean Monk Seal. In: Turner RK, Bateman IJ, Adger N, editors. Economics of coastal and water resources: Valuing environmental functions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. LaRiviere J., Hanley N., Czajkowski M., Aanesen M., Tinch D., 2014, The Value of Familiarity: Effects of Experience, Knowledge and Signals on Willingness to Pay for a Public Good. J Env. Econ. Manag., 68 (2), 376-389. Lester SE, Halpern BS, Grorud-Colvert K, Lubchenco J, Ruttenberg BI, Gaines S.D., Airamé S., Warner R.R., 2009, Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 384: 33–46. Loomis J.B., 1988, Contingent valuation using dichotomous choice models. J. Leis. Res.20 (1), 46-56. Loomis J.B., Larson D.M., 1994, Total economic value of increasing Gray Whale populations: results from a contingent valuation survey of visitors and households, Mar Res Econ. 9, 275- 286. Lopez A.G., Cuervo-Arango M.A., 2008, Relationship among values, beliefs, norms and ecological behavior. Psicothema, 20 (4), 623- 629. López-Mosquera N., Sánchez M., 2012, Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value- Belief-Norm Theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J Env. Manag., 113, 251–262. Louviere J.J., 2001, Choice experiments: an overview of concepts and issues', in J. Bennett and R. Blamey (eds), The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, E. Elgar, Northampton, MA, USA:13-36. Mäler K.G., Vincent J.R. eds., 2005, Handbook of Environmental Economics, Volume 2: Valuing Environmental Changes. K. Arrow and M. Intriligator, series editors. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Martìn-Lopez, B.,C. Montes, J. Benayas. 2007, The non-economic ´ motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 139, 67–82. Matsiori S., Aggelopoulos S., Tsoutsou A., Neofitou Ch., Soutsas K,. Vafidis D., 2012, Economic value of conservation: The case of the Edible Sea Urchin Paracentrotus lividus. J. Environ. Protect Ecol. 13(1), 269–274. Matsiori S., Stamkopoulos Z., Aggelopoulos S., Soutsas K., Neofitou Ch., Vafidis D., 2013, Social Values of Biodiversity Conservation for Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus). Afr J Agric Res. 8(18), 2022-2026. Meyerhoff J., Liebe U., 2006, Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation. Ecol Econ. 57, 583-594. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Island Press, Washington. Mitchell R, Carson R., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future. Moran D., 1994, Contingent valuation and biodiversity: measuring the user surplus of Kenyan protected areas. Biol Conserv. 3, 663-684. Needham M.D., 2010, Value orientations toward coral reefs in recreation and tourism settings: a conceptual and measurement approach. J Sust. Tour., 18 (6), 757–772. Ninan K.N., Sathyapalan J., 2005, The economics of biodiversity conservation: A study of a coffee growing region in the Western Ghats of India. Ecol Econ. 55, 61-72. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) 2002,. Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation: A Guide for Policy Makers. OECD Publishing. Olli E., Grendstad G., Wollebaek D., 2001,. Correlates of environmental behaviors: Bringing back social context. Environment and Behavior, 33(2), 181-208. Panou A., Jacobs J., Panos D, 1993, The Endangered Mediterranean Monk Seal Monachus monachus in the Ionian Sea, Greece. Biol Conserv. 64, 129-140. Pearce D.W., Moran D., 1998, The economics of biological diversity conservation, In P. Fiedler and P. Kareiva (eds), Conservation Biodiversity for the Coming Decades, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 384-409. Pearce, D., Moran, D. (1994). The Economic Value of Biodiversity. Earthscan Publications Limited, London. Pinuccia C., Strazzera E., 2000. Bias and efficiency of single versus double bound models for contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo analysis Appl Econ., 32 (10): 1329-1336. Ready R.C., Buzby, J.C., Hu, D., 1996, Differences between continuous and discrete contingent value estimates, Land Econ. 72(3): 397-411. Reijnders P., Brasseur S., van der Torn J., van der Wolf P., Boyd I., Harwood J., Lavigne D., Lowry L., 1993, Seals, Fur Seals, Sea Lions and Walrus. Status Survey and Conservation Plan. IUCN/SSG Seal Specialist Group. Reynisdottir M., Song H., Agrusa J., 2008, Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tour. Manage. 29(6), 1076–1083. Rideout B.E., Hushen K., McGinty D., Perkins S., Tate J., 2005, Endorsement of the new environmental paradigm in systematic and e–mail samples of college students. J Environ Educ. 36(2), 15–23. Schläpfer, F., 2006, Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: a metaanalysis. Ecol. Econ. 57, 415–429. Shogren J.F., Tschirhart J., Anderson T., Ando A.W., Beissinger S.R., Brookshire D., Brown G.M.Jr., Coursey D., Innes R., Meyer S.M., 1999, Why economics matters for endangered species protection. Conserv Biol. 13,1257–1261. Steenkamp N., Hughes G., 1997, Parks are For People, The Value of South Africa's Protected Natural Areas, African Wildlife -Eppindust- Vol 51, Number 2. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Kalof L., 1993, Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ Behav. 25, 322–348. Stithou M., 2009. Respondent Certainty and Collective versus Voluntary Payment in Conservation of Marine Biodiversity. Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2009-21, University of Stirling, Division of Economics. Stithou M., Scarpa R. 2012, Collective versus Voluntary Payment in Conservation of Marine Biodiversity: an Exploratory Study from Zakynthos, Greece. Ocean Coast Manag. 6, 1-9. Subade R.F., 2005, Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation of a world heritage site: citizens’ non-use values for Tubbataha Reefs National Marine Park, Sulu Sea, Philippines. Research Report No. 2005-RR5. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA). Singapore. Togridou A., Hovardas T., Pantis J.D., 2006, Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecol Econ. 60, 308–319. Trainor S., Norgaard R.B. 1999, Recreation fees in the context of wilderness values. J. Park Recreation Admin, 17, 100–115 Trakolis D., 2001, Local people’s perceptions of planning and management issues in Prespes Lakes National Park, Greece. J of Environ Manage. 61, 227–241 Van Kooten G.C., 1993, Bioeconomic Evaluation of Government Agricultural Programs on Wetland Land Econ. 69(1), 27-38. Wang P.W., Jia, J.B., 2012, Tourists’ willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation and environment protection, Dalai Lake protected area: Implications for entrance fee and sustainable management. Ocean Coast. Manage. 62, 24–33. Wright M., Klÿn B., 1998, Environmental Attitude – Behaviour Correlations in 21 Countries. J Empir Generalisations Mark Sci 3, 42–60. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/82490 |