Cadar, Otilia and Badulescu, Daniel (2017): Innovation and performance. An analysis on European and Romanian companies. Published in: The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences , Vol. 1, No. XXVI (1 July 2017): pp. 59-72.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_82801.pdf Download (165kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The challenges of the economy and of the modern society based on knowledge are closely related to the success of firms, their ability to generate new, innovative products and services, in a steady pace and in a large, diverse structure in order to ensure performance and long-term welfare. In a global world where countries compete to produce and promote the market for quality and convenient products for the consumers, the innovation capacity of a country and the innovative capabilities of companies acquire a special importance. Numerous studies have analyzed the determinants of innovation of the innovative activities in companies, focusing in particular on organizational and technological capabilities and associated strategies required for successful innovation. There are different types of measuring innovation at the firm level, and in this paper we chose four main groups inspired by the typology promoted by OECD and Eurostat: product innovation, process innovation, organizational innovation, marketing innovation. To remain competitive in the long term, companies must consider all these areas, introduce new products to market, improve the quality of the existing products, upgrade or purchase new production technologies. Based on statistical reports of world and national organizations, our research highlights an extremely diverse and heterogeneous picture of the performance innovation indicators in Europe and the situation in Romania, by comparison both with the EU average, with countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), but also with their own performance in prior periods.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Innovation and performance. An analysis on European and Romanian companies |
English Title: | Innovation and performance. An analysis on European and Romanian companies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | innovation, innovative firms, performance, EU, Romania |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 82801 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Daniel Badulescu |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2017 16:25 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 08:07 |
References: | [1] Artz, K., Norman, P., Hatfield, D. and Cardinal, L., (2010) ”A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), pp. 725-740. [2] Atalay, M., Anafarta, N. and Sarvan, F. (2013) ”The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 75, p. 226 – 235. [3] Audretsch, D. (2005) ”The emergence of entrepreneurial economics”, Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 37-54. [4] Audretsch, D. B. and Thurik R. (2001) ”Linking Entrepreneurship to Growth”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2001/02, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/736170038056. [5] Badulescu, A., (2010) ”Entrepreneurial Motivations: Are Women Driven By Different Motivators Than Men? (II – Some Evidence for EU and Romania)”, Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Sciences Series, TOM XIX, no. 2, pp. 358-364. [6] Badulescu, A. (2011) Start-up financing sources: does gender matter? Some evidence for EU and Romania, The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences, Special edition 2011, pp. 207-214. [7] Badulescu, A., Dodescu, A., (2010) ”Entrepreneurial Training and the Attitude toward Entrepreneurship. Assessing the Impact of Antres programme”, WSEAS International Conference on Economy and Management Transformation, West University of Timisoara, October 24-26, [Online], Available: http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2010/TimisoaraW/EMT/EMT1-00.pdf [8] Badulescu, D. and Petria, N. (2011) Collateral’s Importance in SMEs Financing: What Is The Banks’ Response? Some Evidence For Romania, The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences, Tom XX, vol. 1, pp. 256-260. [9] Badulescu, D., Cadar, O. (2016) ”Romania: Many Entrepreneurs but Few Innovators”, Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p. 465-475. [10] Bayarçelik, E.B. and Taşel, F. (2012) ”Research and Development: Source of Economic Growth”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.58, 12, October 2012, 695-701, 8th International Strategic Management Conference, June 20-24 2012, Barcelona/Spain. [11] Calantone, R., Cavusgil, S. and Zhao, Y. (2002) ”Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), pp. 515-524. [12] de Jong, J., Kemp, R. and Meijaard, J. (2002) ”Incentives to innovate. Testing antecendents of innovation in small and medium-sized service firms”, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: SCALES - Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs. [13] Dodescu, A., Badulescu, A., Giurgiu, A., Pop-Cohut, I, (2011) Women Entrepreneurship in the Western Romania. Research Results and Policy Recommendations, Theoretical and Applied Economics, 1 (554), pp. 25-48. [14] Dumitriu R., Nunu C., (2016) Inovaţia în întreprinderile din mediul de afaceri perioada 2012-2014, Institutul Național de Statistică, [Online], Available: http://www.insse.ro/cms/ro/content/inova%C5%A3ie-%C3%AEn-mediul-de-afaceri [15] European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), (2014) Transition Report 2014: Innovation in Transition, London: EBRD. [16] Eurostat, Innovation statistics, [Online], Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Innovation_statistics [17] Geroski, P., Machin, S. and Van Reenen, J. (1993) ”The profitability of innovating firms”, Rand Journal of Economics, 24(2), pp. 198-211. [18] Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K. and Alpkan, L. (2011) ”Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance”, International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), p. 662–676. [19] Han, J., Kim, N. and Srivastaka, R. (1998) ”Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation missing link?”, Journal of Marketing, Volume 62, pp. 30-45. [20] Harris, L. (2001) ”Market orientation and performance: objective and subjective empirical evidence from UK companies”, Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), pp. 17-43. [21] Institutul Național de Statistică (INS), (2016) Comunicat de Presă Nr. 189/28 iulie 2016, [Online], Available: http://www.insse.ro/cms/sites/default/files/com_presa/com_pdf/inovatie_afaceri15r_2.pdf [22] Kemp, R., Folkeringa, M., de Jong, J. and Wubben, E. (2003) ”Innovation and firm performance. Research Report H200207”, Zoetermeer, Netherlands: SCALES - Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs. [23] Murphy, G., Trailer, J. and Hill, R. (1996) ”Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research”, Journal of Business Venturing, 36(1), pp. 15-23. [24] OECD and Eurostat, (2005) Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris: OECD. [25] Roberts, P. (1999) ”Product innovation, product-market competition and persistant profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry”, Stategic Management Journal, Volume 20, p. 655–670. [26] Schumpeter, J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press. [27] Sohn, S., Joo, Y. and Han, H. (2007) ”Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria”, Evaluation and Program Planning, Volume 30, pp. 10-20. [28] Talmaciu (Banu), A. M. and Cismaş, L. M. (2017) ”Analysis of the Trinom Migration -FDI- Competitiveness. Case Study: Romania (2004-2015)”, Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. II Iss. 1, pp. 63-71. [29] Tonț, D. M. and Tonţ, M. D. (2016) ”An overview of innovation sources in SMEs”, Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 1(1), pp. 58 – 67. [30] Varis, M. and Littunen, H. (2010) ”Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entreprenurial SMEs”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), pp. 128-154. [31] Wolff, J. and Pett, T. (2006) ”Small-firm performance: Modeling the role of product and process improvements”, Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), pp. 268-284. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/82801 |