Quis custodiet ipsos custodies in the Internet: self-regulation as a threat and a promise

Cave, Jonathan and Marsden, Christopher (2008): Quis custodiet ipsos custodies in the Internet: self-regulation as a threat and a promise.

Abstract

ICT domains have always been subject to technical, economic and/or societal regulation. The traditional basis was a 'governance gap' between economically-motivated activities and external consequences for other firms, end-users, public services, etc. Recent changes in European market and societal contexts and policy initiatives have triggered a reconsideration of this basis. Four developments are particularly challenging: enterprise convergence and divergence that reshape market and sector boundaries; evolution of 'converged' regulators; new regulatory concerns (IPR enforcement, RFID, net neutrality); and changes in the policy context. These combine to lay the foundation for cross-cutting reviews and rebalancing of regulatory roles and responsibilities with profound structural and dynamic implications. This has been largely confined to formal regulation while much governance is provided by a spectrum of self- and co-regulatory organisations (hereafter referred to as XROs). This paper analyses XRO roles, functions and impacts and their implications for regulatory postures more supportive of overarching policy objectives, more transparent and accountable, more flexible in response to technological and other changes, less burdensome to those regulated and less likely to distort market evolution. It draws on a review of the self-regulation literature in a wide range of contexts, including financial services and professional self-regulation, 21 extended case studies of Internet XROs, an analytic treatment of the determinants and impacts of XRO formation, agenda-setting, rules, monitoring, enforcement and compliance; and a policy analysis of the scope for regulatory engagement with XROs and methods for option development and ex ante evaluation. Particular issues concern: the degree to which XROs form around specific issues, market segments, personalities or action modes (e.g. standardisation); whether different types of statutory or XRO governance are likely to adopt more stringent or more cost-effective rules; whether different arrangements are more vulnerable to capture or corruption; and whether compliance will be higher under specific types of arrangements. Public policy and the peer-reviewed literature converge on the recognition that there is always a price to be paid for regulation in the form of distortion, cost, institutionalisation, agenda creep and so on. This must be offset against justifying benefits, which may mean extending or shrinking regulation in various areas, rebalancing rule-making and rule-enforcing, delegating or clawing back responsibility, etc. It is necessary to reassess how, but whether and even why regulation should be done. Generally, this calls for some evolved form of, or alternative to, regulation. The paper presents six specific findings and associated recommendations for policy formulation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: self-regulation; co-regulation; regulation; Internet; network neutrality
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory; K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law

References

[1] Armstrong, H. (2006) “Update on the Implementation of ‘Less is More’”, letter dated 13 July 2006 by UK Minister for Trade and Industry documenting progress in implementing the Better Regulation agenda, at: http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/brc/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/ha_letter.pdf on 29 February 2008.

[2] Ashby, S., S. Chuah and R. Hoffmann (2004) “Industry Self-regulation: A Gametheoretic Typology of Strategic Voluntary Compliance” International Journal of the Economics of Business 11(1): 91–106.

[3] Bartle, I. and P. Vass (2007) “Self-regulation within the Regulatory State: Towards a New Regulatory Paradigm?” Public Administration 85(4): 885–905.

[4] Bauer, J. and E. Bohlin (2007) “Dynamic Regulation: Conceptual Foundations, Implementation, Effects”, paper presented to the 35th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference Arlington, VA, 28-30 September, 2007.

[5] Benhamou, B. (2006) “Organiser l’architecture de l’internet” Esprit (May) at: http://www.esprit.presse.fr/review/article.php?code=13244 on 29 February 2008

[6] Better Regulation Commissioners (2007) “Position Paper on EC Better Regulation Agenda”, position paper by German, British and Dutch Better Regulation Commissioners, mimeo (no longer available, obtained from Better Regulation Task Force (BRTF) website on November 11 2007).

[7] Better Regulation Task Force (1999) “Self–Regulation Interim Report", at: http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/brc/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/self_regulation. pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[8] Better Regulation Task Force (2000a) “Alternatives to State Regulation”, at: http://www.brc.gov.uk/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/stateregulation.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[9] Better Regulation Task Force (2003) “Imaginative Thinking about Regulation”, at: http://www.brc.gov.uk/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/imaginativeregulation.pdf/ on 29 Feb. 2008.

[10] Better Regulation Task Force (2004) “Hidden Menace – Regulatory Creep”, at: http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/brc/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/hiddenmenace. pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[11] Better Regulation Task Force (2005a) “Routes to Better Regulation – a guide to alternatives to classic regulation”, at: http://www.brc.gov.uk/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/routes.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[12] Better Regulation Task Force (2005b) “Less is More. Reducing Burdens, Improving Outcomes”, at: http://www.brc.gov.uk/upload/assets/www.brc.gov.uk/lessismore.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[13] Borraz, O. (2007) “Governing Standards: The Rise of Standardization Processes in France and in the EU” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 20(1): 57–84.

[14] Börzel, T. (2000) “Private Actors on the Rise? The Role of Non-state Actors in Compliance with International Institutions” Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter, at: http://www.mpp-rdg.mpg.de on 29 Feb. 2008.

[15] Brousseau, E. (2002) “Internet Regulation: Does Self-regulation Require an Institutional Framework?” DRUID Summer Conference on "Industrial Dynamics ofthe New and Old Economy - who is embracing whom?" Copenhagen/Elsinore 6-8 June 2002.

[16] Brunekreeft, G. (2004) “Regulatory Threat in Vertically Related Markets: The Case of German Electricity” European Journal of Law and Economics 17: 285–305.

[17] Cabinet Office (UK) (2006) “Impact Assessment Guidance”, at http://bre.berr.gov.uk/regulation/ria/ria_guidance/ on 29 Feb. 2008.

[18] Coase, R. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost” Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1– 44.

[19] Coen, D. (2005) “Business–Regulatory Relations: Learning to Play Regulatory Games in European Utility Markets” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18(3): 375–398.

[20] DeMarzo, P., M. Fishman, M. and K. Hagerty (2000) “The Enforcement Policy of a Self-regulatory Organization”," mimeo, Stanford University Business School mimeo.

[21] DeMarzo, P., M. Fishman, M. and K. Hagerty (2005a) “Self-regulation and Government Oversight” Review of Economic Studies 72(3): 687-–706.

[22] DeMarzo, P., M. Fishman, M. and K. Hagerty (2005b) “Contracting and Enforcement with a Self-regulatory Organization”," at: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/finance/faculty/workingpapers/DeMarzo_Fish man_Hagerty.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[23] Dommering, E. (2006) “Regulating Technology: Code Is Not Law”, in E. Dommering and L.F. Asscher (eds) Coding Regulation: Essays on the Normative Role of Information Technology, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 6–17.

[24] Duina, F. (1999) Harmonizing Europe: Nation-states within the Common Market, New York: State University of New York Press.

[25] Duncombe, R. and R. Heeks (2002) “Information, ICTs and Ethical Trade: Implications for Self-regulation”, University of Manchester Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper 41.

[26] Engel, C. (2005) “Governing the Egalitarian Core of the Internet” International Journal of Communications Law & Policy 10: 1–25.

[27] European Commission (2002) “Action Plan on Better Regulation” at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2002/com2002_0278en01.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[28] European Commission (2003) “Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Regulation” relevant material cited in “The activities of the European Union for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): SME Envoy Report” a Commission Staff Working paper SEC(2005) 170 dated 08/02/2005 and available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/entrepreneurship/promoting_entrepreneurship/doc/sec_ 2005_170_en.pdf on 29 February, 2008. .

[29] European Network Information Security Agency (2007) ENISA Position Paper No.1: Security Issues and Recommendations for Online Social Networks, at http://www.enisa.europa.eu/doc/pdf/deliverables/enisa_pp_social_networks.pdf last on 29 February 2008.

[30] European Policy Forum (2006) “Evaluating Better Regulation: Building the System”, City Research Series 9 London: City of London, at: http://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/nr/rdonlyres/9af7248c-71a9-4434-8c9cdc935b9f33d6/ 0/bc_rs_evaluating_execsummary.pdf on 29 February, 2008.

[31] Faratin, P., D. Clark, P. Gilmore, S. Bauer, A. Berger and W. Lehr (2007) “Complexity of Internet Interconnections: Technology, Incentives and Implications for Policy”, paper presented to the 35th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference Arlington, VA, 28-30 September, 2007.

[32] Fenn, P. and A. Macguire (1994) “The Assessment: The Economics of Legal Reform” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 10(1): 1–17.

[33] Finger, M. and F. Varone (2006) “Governance of Network Industries: Towards European Regulators, Differentiated Regulations, or Self-regulation?” paper presented to the European Consortium for Political Research Standing Group on Regulatory Governance Conference, University of Bath, Bath, 7–8 September.

[34] Freytag, A. and K. Winkler (2004) “The Economics of Self-regulation in Telecommunications under Sunset Legislation”, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät Working Paper.

[35] Fried, E. (2006) “Assessing the Effectiveness of Self-regulation: A Case Study of the Children’s Advertising Unit” 39 Loyola Law Review 1: 93-138.

[36] Frieden, R. (2007) “Neither Fish Nor Fowl: New Strategies for Selective Regulation of Information Services”, paper presented to the 35th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference Arlington, VA, 28-29 September, 2007.

[37] Gehrig, T. and P.-J. Jost (1995) “Quacks, Lemons, and Self-regulation: A Welfare Analysis” Journal of Regulatory Economics 7: 309–325.

[38] Goldsmith, J. and T. Wu (2006) Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[39] Grajzl, P. and M. Murrell (2007) “Allocating Lawmaking Powers: Self-regulation vs. Government Regulation” Journal of Comparative Economics 35: 520–545.

[40] Greenstein, S. (2006) “Letters ‘Re: Open Standards, Open Source and Open Innovation’ by Elliot Maxwell” Innovations 1(4): 3–4.

[41] Hans Bredow Institut (2007) Analyse des Jugendmedienschutzsystems: Jugendschutzgesetz und Jugendmedienschutz-Staatsvertrag, Hans Bredow Institut, Hamburg, at http://www.hans-bredowinstitut. de/forschung/recht/071030Jugendschutz-Endbericht.pdf last accessed 29 February 2008 and http://www.hans-bredowinstitut. de/forschung/recht/jugendmedienschutz-games.htm last accessed 29 February 2008

[42] Held, T. and A. Scheuer (2006) “Final Report: Study on Co-Regulation Measures in the Media Sector” Study for the European Commission, Directorate Information Society and Media Unit A1 Audiovisual and Media Policies, Hans Bredow Institute at: http://www.hans-bredow-institut.de/forschung/recht/co-reg/Co-Reg- Draft_Final_Report.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[43] Hilary, G. and C. Lenox (2005) “The Credibility of Self-regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession’s Peer Review Program” Journal of Accounting and Economics 40: 211–229.

[44] Hira, A., D. Huxtable and A. Leger (2005) “Deregulation and Participation: An International Survey of Participation in Electricity Regulation” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18(1): 53–88.

[45] Humphreys, P. and S. Padgett (2006) “Globalization, the European Union, and Domestic Governance in Telecoms and Electricity” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 19(3): 383–406.

[46] ICSTIS (2006) ICSTIS 1986-2006, A celebration, ICSTIS: London.

[47] Jacobs, C. (2005) “Improving the Quality of Regulatory Impact Assessments in the UK” Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper 102.

[48] Jacobs, C. (2006) “Current Trends in Regulatory Impact Analysis: The Challenges of Mainstreaming RIA into Policy-making”, mimeo, Jacobs & Associates.

[49] Joskow, P. and R. Noll (1999) “The Bell Doctrine: Applications in Telecommunications, Electricity, and Other Network Industries” Stanford Law Review 21: 1249 - 1315

[50] Kerwer, D. (2005) “Rules that Many Use: Standards and Global Regulation” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18(4): 611–632.

[51] Krarup, S. (1999) “The Efficiency of Voluntary Approaches: A CAVA Literature Survey” CAVA Working Paper 99/08/2.

[52] Latzer, M., N. Just, F. Sauerwein and P. Slowinski (2006) “Institutional Variety in Communications Regulation. Classification Scheme and Empirical Evidence from Austria” Telecommunications Policy 30: 152–170.

[53] Latzer, M., M. Price, F. Saurwein, S. Verhulst, K. Hollnbuchner and L. Ranca (2007) Comparative Analysis of International Co- and Self-regulation in Communications Markets, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.

[54] Lenox, M. (2006) “The Role of Private Decentralized Institutions in Sustaining Industry Self-regulation” Organization Science 17(6): 677–690.

[55] Lessig, L. (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, New York: Basic Books.

[56] Levi-Faur, D. (2006a) “Varieties of Regulatory Capitalism: Getting the Most Out of the Comparative Method” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 19(3): 367–382.

[57] Levi-Faur, D. (2006b) “Varieties of Regulatory Capitalism: Sectors and Nations in the Making of a New Global Order” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 19(3): 363–366.

[58] Ling, T. (2003) “Planning Approach Ex Ante Evaluation and the Changing Public Audit Function: The Scenario” Evaluation 9(4): 437–452.

[59] Lyon, T. and J. Maxwell (2003) “Self-regulation, Taxation and Public Voluntary Environmental Agreements” Journal of Public Economics 87: 1453–1486.

[60] MacCormack, A., J. Rusnack and C. Baldwin (2005) “Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs” Harvard Business School, unpublished Draft Working Paper 05-016, June.

[61] Maitland, I. (1985) “The Limits of Business Self-regulation” California Management Review 7(3): 132–147.

[62] Marsden, C. (2007) “Net Neutrality and Access to Content” Script-ed 4(4): 406–457 at: http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/ on 29 Feb. 2008.

[63] Marvin, C. (1998) When Old Technologies Were New, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[64] Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2003) “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Proxy Battles over P2P Movie Sharing”, mimeo.

[65] Mayer-Schonberger, V. and M. Ziewitz (2007) “Jefferson Rebuffed: The United States and the Future of Internet Governance” 8 Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 8: 188–228.

[66] Meyer, W. and K. Baltes (2004) “Network Failures – How Realistic Is Durable Cooperation in Global Governance?” in J. Klaus, M. Binder and A. Wieczorek (eds)Governance for Industrial Transformation. Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin: Environmental Policy Research Centre, pp. 31-51

[67] National Audit Office (2002) “Alternatives to State-imposed Regulation” report to the 9th Meeting of INTOSAI Working Group on the Audit of Privatisation, Oslo, June 2002 at: http://www.nao.org.uk/intosai/wgap/9thmeeting/9thpuk.pdf on 29 February 2008

[68] National Consumer Council (2003) “Three Steps to Credible Self-regulation”, at: http://www.ncc.org on 29 Feb. 2008.

[69] National Consumer Council (2004) “Future Regulation of Broadcast Advertising”, at: http://www.ncc.org on 29 Feb. 2008.

[70] National Science Foundation (2004) Signposts in Cyberspace, Washington DC: National Science Foundation.

[71] Newman, A. and D. Bach (2004) “Self-regulatory Trajectories in the Shadow of Public Power: Resolving Digital Dilemmas in Europe and the United States” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17(3): 387–413.

[72] Nunez, J. (2007) “Can Self-regulation Work? A Story of Corruption, Impunity and Cover-up” Journal of Regulatory Economics 31: 209–233.

[73] Odlyzko, A. (2000) “The History of Communications and its Implications for the Internet”, preliminary version, unpublished manuscript, 16 June.

[74] Office of Fair Trading (2007a) “Review of Impact on Business of the Consumer Codes Approval Scheme”, at: http://www.oft.gov.uk on 29 Feb. 2008.

[75] Office of Fair Trading (2007b) “Completing Competition Assessments in Impact Assessments”, at: http://www.oft.gov.uk on 29 Feb. 2008.

[76] Pattberg, P. (2005) “The Institutionalization of Private Governance: How Business and Nonprofit Organizations Agree on Transnational Rules” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18(4): 589–610.

[77] PCMLP (2004) “Self-Regulation of Digital Media Converging on the Internet: Industry Codes of Conduct in Sectoral Analysis” Report by the Programme in Comparative Media Law and Policy at the centre for Socio-Legal Studies at Oxford University for the European Commission, at: http://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/selfregulation/iapcoda/0405-iapcode-final.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[78] Pirrong, C. (2001) “Technological Change, For-profit Exchanges, and the Self-regulation of Financial Markets”, Washington University Working Paper.

[79] Polasky, S., N. Tarui, G. Ellis and C. Mason (2006) “Cooperation in the Commons” Economic Theory 29: 71–88.

[80] Porter, T. and K. Ronit (2006) “Self-regulation as Policy Process: The Multiple and Criss-crossing Stages of Private Rule-making” Policy Sciences 39: 41–72.

[81] Posner, R. (1971) “Taxation by Regulation” Bell Journal of Economics 2: 22–50.

[82] Priest, M. (1997) “The Privatisation of Regulation: Five Models of Self-regulation” 233 Ottawa Law Review 29: 233-301.

[83] Schulz, W. and T. Held (2004) Regulated Self-Regulation as a Form of Modern Government: A Comparative Analysis with Case Studies from Media and Telecommunications Law, Luton: University Of Luton Press.

[84] Sickert, D. and T. Lookabaugh (2005) “A Model for Emergency Service of VoIP Through Certification and Labelling”, mimeo, NET Institute.

[85] Stefanadis, C. (2003) “Self-regulation, Innovation and the Financial Industry” Journal of Regulatory Economics 23(1): 5–25.

[86] Stock, B. (1993) The Uses of Literacy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[87] Torriti, J. (2007) “Impact Assessment in the EU – A Tool for Better Regulation, Less Regulation or Less Bad Regulation” Journal of Risk Research 10(2): 239–276.

[88] van der Stoel, A., N. van Eijk, D. Hoogland, E. van Noorduyn and M. Wermuth (2005) “Self-regulation in Audiovisual Products” final report commissioned by the Youth Policy Directorate, the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (in Dutch), at: http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/vaneijk/Wijzerkijken.pdf on 29 Feb. 2008.

[89] Wilks, S. (2005) “Agency Escape: Decentralization or Dominance of the European Commission in the Modernization of Competition Policy?” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18(3): 431-452.

[90] World Trade Organization (2005) WT/DS285/AB/R Gambling Services – WTO Appellate Panel Decision.

[91] Wu, T. (2006) “The World Trade Law of Internet Filtering” Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=882459 on 29 February 2008.

[92] Zittrain, J. (2006a) “The Generative Internet” Harvard Law Review 119: 1974–2040.

[93] Zittrain, J. (2006b) “A History of Online Gatekeeping” 19 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 2: 254–298.