Does New Public Management Practices Lead to Effective Public Welfare Responses in Pakistan

Asif, Rehman and Dawood, Mamoon (2017): Does New Public Management Practices Lead to Effective Public Welfare Responses in Pakistan.

Abstract

New Public Management is used to regulate government policies meant to enhance performance of public sector that ultimately facilitates general public interest and improve their living standards. New Public Management is inevitable as under this approach modern governments are inclined to bring reforms in an effort to improve efficiency and effectiveness of public sector by adopting private sector practices. Pakistan is also influenced by NPM as reforms in public sector have been developed and implemented to some extent with weak claims of improved performance. The lack of actual improvement in performance raises many questions on the effectiveness of NPM implementation in Pakistan. This study aims to explore these questions by measuring factors influencing performance of public sector organizations in Pakistan. This study adopted quantitative approach to conduct an empirical investigation. Research framework includes major factors of NPM based on literature. Data was collected using adopted questionnaires for each variable. Survey was done from a sample taken from public sectors enterprises in Punjab province under random sampling technique. Data was analyzed using various statistical techniques. Demographics were analyzed in the form of descriptive statistics. Research variables were analyzed using Multiple Regression analysis and Pearson Correlation analysis. Regression assumptions were tested which were fulfilled. Reliability and validity were also tested. Findings show that both “Democratization and Participation (Involvement in Decision Making)”; and “Customer Concept (Customer Orientation)” have positive influence on performance under NPM. Whereas interestingly “Decentralization (Delegation)” has negative influence on performance under NPM as a result of resistance of employees towards recent attempts of Devolution of power or authority. But surprisingly “Management Style (HR Practices)” show no influence on performance under NPM as a result of unresponsiveness of employees towards modern management related practices.Recommendations have been provided as general and specific strategies for effective implementation of NPM in order to enhance organizational performance under NPM.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Public Policy, Public Administration, Governance, Welfare Economics, Policy Evaluation
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government; H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues

References

Alonso, J. M., Clifton, J., & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2013). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review(ahead-of-print), 1-18.

Arfeen, M. I., & Khan, N. (2009). Public Sector Innovation: Case Study of e-government Projects in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 439-457.

Aucoin, P. (1990). Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums. Governance, 3(2), 115-137.

Boston, J. (1996). Public management: the New Zealand model: Oxford University Press, USA.

Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of public administration research and theory, 10(4), 685-712.

Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management accounting research, 11(3), 281-306.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2001). New Public Management: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control. Public Management Review, 3(1), 73-94.

Cole, A., & Jones, G. (2005). Reshaping the state: Administrative reform and new public management in France. Governance, 18(4), 567-588.

Dan, S., & Pollitt, C. (2014). NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe. Public Management Review(ahead-of-print), 1-28.

David, O., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: Prentice Hall of India.

den Heyer, G. (2011). New public management: A strategy for democratic police reform in transitioning and developing countries. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 34(3), 419-433.

Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public money & management, 14(3), 9-16.

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 16(3), 467-494.

Dunsire, A. (1995). Administrative theory in the 1980s: a viewpoint. Public administration, 73(1), 17-40.

Elias Sarker, A. (2006). New public management in developing countries: An analysis of success and failure with particular reference to Singapore and Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 180-203.

Ferris, J. M., & Graddy, E. A. (1998). A contractual framework for new public management theory. International public management journal, 1(2), 225-240.

Glor, E. D. (2001). Has Canada adopted the new public management? Public Management Review, 3(1), 121-130.

Gordon, L. A., & Narayanan, V. K. (1984). Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: an empirical investigation. Accounting, organizations and society, 9(1), 33-47.

Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International public management journal, 4(1), 1-25.

Hammerschmid, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2011). The impact of the new public management: Challenges for coordination and cohesion in European public sectors. Administrative Culture(12_2), 190-209.

Hood, C. (1991a). A public management for all seasons. Public administration, 69(1), 3-19.

Hood, C. (1991b). A public management for all seasons? Public administration, 69(1), 3-19.

Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Accounting, organizations and society, 20(2), 93-109.

Hope Sr, K. R., & Chikulo, B. C. (2000). Decentralization, the new public management, and the changing role of the public sector in Africa. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(1), 25-42.

Jarl, M., Fredriksson, A., & Persson, S. (2012). New public management in public education: a catalyst for the professionalization of Swedish school principals. Public administration, 90(2), 429-444.

Jeppesen, H. J., Rasmussen, T.H. (2003). The METEOR-Project. University of Aarhus, Aarhus.

Kalimullah, N. A., Ashraf, K., & Ashaduzzaman, M. (2012). New public management: Emergence and principles. Bup Journal, 1(1), 1-22.

Khilji, S. E., & Wang, X. (2006). ‘Intended’and ‘implemented’HRM: the missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(7), 1171-1189.

Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of public administration research and theory, 15(2), 245-261.

Knack, S. (2004). Does foreign aid promote democracy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 251-266.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas.

Leeuw, F. L. (1996). Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and answers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 92-102.

Legge, K. (1995). HRM: rhetoric, reality and hidden agendas. Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, London: Routledge, 33-59.

Lengnick-Hall, M. L., Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Andrade, L. S., & Drake, B. (2009). Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field. Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 64-85.

Lund, R., & Gjerding, A. N. (1996). The flexible company: innovation, work organization and human resource management. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics (DRUID) Working Paper(96-17).

Marobela, M. (2008). New public management and the corporatisation of the public sector in peripheral capitalist countries. International Journal of social economics, 35(6), 423-434.

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing, 20-35.

Naveed, S., & Jadoon, M. Z. I. (2012). HRM in Public Enterprises in Pakistan.

Norton, S. (2007). Lost in translation: The inappropriateness of occidental new public management to reform of the public sector bureaucracy in Japan. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 674-693.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Reading Mass. Adison Wesley Public Comp.

Owusu, M. (2006). Uses and Abuses of Political Power: a case study of continuity and change in the politics of Ghana: Ghana University Press.

Paracha, S. A. (2003). Devolution Plan in Pakistan: Context, implementation and issues. Open Society Institute, Budapest–Hungary.

Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience: Basil Blackwell.

Pollitt, C., & Dan, S. (2011). The impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A meta-analysis. status: published.

Reichard, C. (1996). Die „New Public Management “-Debatte im internationalen Kontext. Kommunalverwaltung im Modernisierungsschub, 241-274.

Savoie, D. J. (2003). Breaking the bargain: Public servants, ministers, and parliament: University of Toronto Press.

Schachter, H. L. (1989). Frederick Taylor and the public administration community: A reevaluation: Suny Press.

Schedler, K. (1995a). Ansätze einer wirkungsorientierten Verwaltungsführung: von der Idee des new public management (NPM) zum konkreten Gestaltungsmodell: Fallstudie Schweiz: P. Haupt.

Schedler, K. (1995b). einer wirkungsorientierten Verwaltungsführung: Bern.

Sehested, K. (2002). How new public management reforms challenge the roles of professionals. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12), 1513-1537.

Steane, P. (1999). Public management developments in Australia and New Zealand. Public Management an International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(1), 133-142.

Theobald, H. (2012). Combining welfare mix and New Public Management: The case of long‐term care insurance in Germany. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(s1), S61-S74.

Turner, M., & Hulme, D. (1997). Governance, administration and development: Making the state work: Macmillan Basingstoke.

Zia, Y. A., & Khan, M. Z. (2013). Drivers of Public Sector Reforms in Pakistan: A Comparison of NPM with Alternative Reform Drivers. Dialogue, 8(4), 453.