Property rights and the dynamics of renewable resources in North-South trade, Chapter 1

Chichilnisky, Graciela (1994): Property rights and the dynamics of renewable resources in North-South trade, Chapter 1. Published in: Trade, Innovation, Environment (1994): pp. 15-54.

Abstract

To explain the patterns of world trade of resources, this paper combines the biological dynamics of the renewable resource and game theoretical explanations of its extraction under different property regimes, with a general equilibrium model of North South trade (Chichilnisky, 1981, 1986). The two regions produce, consume and trade two goods using two inputs, a renewable resource E and capital. To expose the importance of property rights in explaining trade, the two regions are taken as identical except for the property rights regimes on the pool from which the resource is extracted: the South has common property and the North private property. The paper formulates the Nash equilibrium of a game which explains the harvesting of the resource under different property rights regimes: more is supplied at each price under unregulated property rights than it is with private property (Lemma 1). Theorem 1 proves that the difference in property rights by itself explains trade between otherwise identical regions: the South exports the environmentally intensive product even though it has no comparative advantage and the North the capital intensive products. The North overconsumes the resource intensive products which it imports at prices which are below social costs. This occurs even though in equilibrium the prices of all goods and all factors of production are equal across the world. Resources are overextracted and the world pattern of consumption and trade of resources is Pareto inefficient. Several policies which could redress the inefficiency, particularly recent property rights policies towards biodiversity and land ownership in the Americas, are discussed in this paper.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: international trade; natural resources; finite resources; north-south trade; property rights; market inefficiency; policy
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O24 - Trade Policy ; Factor Movement Policy ; Foreign Exchange Policy

References

Amelung, T. (1991). "Tropical Deforestation as an International Economic Problem" Paper presented at the Egon-Sohmen Foundation Conference on Economic Evolution and Environmental Concerns, Linz, Austria, August 30-31.

Arrow K.J., Fisher, C. (1974). "Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty and Irreversibility", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. LXXXVIII No. 2.

Barbier, E.B., Burger, J.C., Markandya, A. (1991). "The Economics of Tropical Deforestation", AMBIO, 20 (2), pp. 55-58.

Barbier, E.B., Burgess, J.C., Aylward, B.A., Bishop, J.T. (1992). "Timber Trade, Trade Policies and Environmental Degradation", LEEC DP 92-01, London Environmental Economic Center.

Binkley, C.S., Vincent, J.R. (1990). "Forest Based Industrialization: A Dynamic Perspective", World Bank Forest Policy Issues Paper, The World Bank, Washington D.C.

Baumol, W, Oates, W. (1975). The Theory of Environmental Policy, Englewood Cliffs NJ. Prentice Hall.

Chichilnisky, G. (1981). "Terms of Trade and Domestic Distribution: Export Led Growth with Abundant Labor Supply", Journal of Development Economics, 8, pp. 163-192.

Chichilnisky, G. (1982). "Basic Needs and Exhaustible Resources in the North-South Debate", World Order Models Project IWO Working Paper No 21, New York.

Chichilnisky, G. (1985). "International Trade in Resources: A General Equilibrium Analysis", in Environmental and Natural Resource Mathematics, American Mathematical Society and Proc. Am. Math. Society, 32, pp. 75-125.

Chichilnisky, G. (1986). "A General Equilibrium Theory of North-South Trade", in W. Heller, R. Starr and D. Starrett (eds.), General Equilibrium Analysis: Essays in Honor of Kenneth Arrow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Chichilnisky, G. (1991). "Global Environment and North-South Trade", Technical Report No. 31, Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, Stanford University, American Economic Review, forthcoming 1994.

Chichilnisky, G. (1993). "Traditional Comparative Advantages vs. Economies of Scale: NAFTA and the GATT", forthcoming, Journal of International Comparative Economics, 1994.

Chichilnisky, G. (1993). "Biodiversity, Property Rights and the Pharmaceutical Industry", Case Study, Columbia Business School, New York, N.Y

Chichilnisky, G. (1994x). "The Abatement of Carbon Emissions in Industrial and Developing Countries", forthcoming in OECD: The Economics of Climate Change (ed. T. Jones), 1994.

Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G.M. (1987). The Evolving International Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Chichilnisky, G. (1990). "On the Mathematical Foundations of Political Economy", Contributions to Political Economy, 9, pp. 25-41.

Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G.M. (1991). Oil in the International Economy, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.

Chichilnisky, G., Heal, G.M. (1983). "Community Preferences and Social Choice", Journal of Mathematical Economics, 12, pp. 33-61.

Coase, R.H. (1960). "The Problem of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 1-44.

Cohen, J., Weitzman, M. (1975). "A Marxian View of Enclosures", Journal of Development Economics.

Dasgupta, P (1982). The Control of Resources, Harvard University Press.

Dasgupta, P (1990). "The Environment as a Commodity", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6 (1), pp. 51-67.

Dasgupta, P, Heal, G.M. (1979). Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge Economic Handbooks Nisbet, Cambridge.

Dasgupta, P, Maler, K.G. (1990). "The Environment and Emerging Development Issues", Working Paper No. 28, The Development Research Programme, London School of Economics.

Dixit, A., Norman, V. (1980). Theory of International Trade, Cambridge UniversityPress.

Hyde, W.F., Newman, D.H. (1991). "Forest Economics in Brief -With Summary Observations for Policy Analysis", Draft Report, Agricultural and Rural Development, The World Bank, Washington D.C.

Jones, R. (1965). "The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models", Journal of Political Economy, 73, pp. 557-572.

Krutilla, J.V. (1976). "Some Environmental Effects of Economic Development", Daedalus, 96, Fall.

Maler, K.G. (1990a). "International Environmental Problems", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6 (1), pp. 80-108.

McDonald, S.L. (1971). Petroleum Conservation in the United States: An Economic Analysis, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London.

Oates, W. (1991). "Global Environmental Management: Towards an Open Economy Environmental Economics", Working Paper No. 91-17, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.

Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and International Trade, Harvard University Press.

Ricardo, D. (1817). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Homewood II Irwin.

Ruitenbeck, H.J. (1990). "The Rainforest Supply Price: A Step Towards estimating a Cost Curve for Rainforest Conservation", Working Paper No. 29, the Development Research Programme, London School of Economics.

Tobey, J.A. (1990). "The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test", Kyklos, Fasc. 2.

Walter, I. (1975). "Trade, Environment and Comparative Advantage", in I. Walter (ed.), International Economics of Pollution, New York, Wiley, pp. 77-93.

Walter, I. (1982). "Environmentally Induced Industrial Relocation to Developing Countries", in S. Rubin and T. Graham (eds.), Environment and Trade, Allenheld Osman and Co., pp. 67-101.

Walter, I., Ugelow, J. (1979). "Environmental Policies in Developing Countries", Ambio, 8, pp. 102-109.