India’s Act East Policy: Walking the Talk

Chakraborty, Debashis and Chakraborty, Anushree (2018): India’s Act East Policy: Walking the Talk.

Abstract

After independence, for four decades, India relied on the development supports from the ‘West’, both from the West European countries and the United States as well as from the Soviet Union. While interaction with the Southeast and East Asian economies continued in international forums like the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a long-term strategic partnership was missing for various reasons.

After initiating the economic liberalization policies in 1991, the country adopted a ‘Look East Policy’ (LEP) with a two-track approach in mind. While on one hand, Japan, Singapore and South Korea were considered as source of technology and investment, high growth rate in several economies of East and Southeast Asia was instrumental in considering them as high potential export markets. India subsequently strengthened the ties with the ‘East’ by becoming Sectoral Dialogue Partner of ASEAN in 1992, covering trade, tourism, investment and science and technology.

India’s ‘Act East Policy’ (AEP) came into effect when the current Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi at his maiden visit to ASEAN-India Summit in 2014 emphasized on practicing more action-oriented policy towards ASEAN and the wider East Asia. The policy is not a strict foreign policy shift. Under close examination, AEP emerged to be continuation and further deepening of the LEP launched. While trade and investment remain central to India’s outreach to Southeast Asia, under the present NDA government, the country has emerged as the net security provider of the region. In 2015, the Prime Minister visited five East Asian countries at various occasions. There have been other high level diplomatic visits to the East, followed by the appropriate diplomatic channels. Therefore, AEP has brought a great sense of speed and priority in engaging with the East Asian countries in general and Southeast Asia in particular.

The current paper examines the opportunities that this new narrative offers for India-East Asia relations in days to come, especially in the current geo-political set-up. At the end, it attempts to seek answers to India’s drive towards greater linkages with this Asian sub-region, both in economic and strategic platforms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: India, Act East Policy, Regional Trade Agreements, Trade in Value Added
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration

References

Airy, Anupama and Jayanth Jacob (2012), ‘India stands upto China on oil block’, Hindustan Times, 18 July, New Delhi.

Asian Development Bank (2009), “Aid for Trade in the Asia and the Pacific: An Update”, Report to the Second Global Review on Aid for Trade, Manila.

Bajpaee, Chietigj (2015), ‘China-India Regional Dimensions of the Bilateral Relationship’, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9(4): 108-145.

Bhattacharyya, Anushree and Debashis Chakraborty (2011), ‘India’s Cross-Border Infrastructure Initiatives in South and Southeast Asia’, International Spectator, 46(2): 109-125.

Chakraborty, Debashis (2014), ‘The Upcoming Indo-ASEAN CECA: Of Great Expectations and Areas of Concern’, China Report, 50(3): 259-276.

Chakraborty, Debashis and Anushree Chakraborty (2014), ‘The Indo-ASEAN Engagement in Regional Trade Agreement: Past, Present and the Future’, Politico, 2(2): 22-37.

Chakraborty, Debashis and Mansi Kedia (2014), ‘An Analysis of India’s recent engagements in Comprehensive and other Trade Agreements in East and Southeast Asia’, Taiwanese Journal of WTO Studies, 25: 24-74.

Chakraborty, Debashis and Dipankar Sengupta (2010), “Integration Experience and Trade Performance of the Indo-ASEAN FTA: A Review of Issues”, in P. Gugler and J. Chaisse (Eds), “Competitiveness of the ASEAN Countries: Corporate and Regulatory Drivers”, pp. 207-237, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Das, Ram Upendra and Jay Dev Dubey (2014), ‘Mechanics of Intra-Industry Trade and FTA: Implications for India in RCEP’, RIS Discussion Paper No. 190, Research and Information System for Developing Countries: New Delhi.

Dolven, Ben, Jennifer K. Elsea, Susan V. Lawrence, Ronald O'Rourke and Ian E. Rinehart (2015), ‘Chinese Land Reclamation in the South China Sea: Implications and Policy Options’, Congressional Research Service Report 44072, Washington DC.

Hamanaka, Shintaro (2014), ‘Trans-Pacific Partnership versus Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting’, ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 146, Asian Development Bank: Manila.

Hayter, Roger and David W. Edgington (2004), “Flying Geese in Asia: The Impacts of Japanese MNCs as a source of industrial learning”, Tijdschriftvoor Economischeen Sociale Geografie, 95(1): 3–26.

International Trade Centre (undated), ‘Trade Map database’, available at:http://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx (accessed February 8, 2016).

Jacob, Jayanth and ReshmaPatil (2011), ‘China warning fails to deter India, Vietnam’, Hindustan Times, 17 September, New Delhi.

Lim, Hank and Fukunari Kimura (2015), ‘The Internationalization of SMEs in Regional and Global Value Chains’, in A. Estevadeordal, A. Kawai and G. Wignaraja (eds) New Frontiers in Asia-Latin America Integration: Trade Facilitation, Production Networks and FTAs, pp. 140-169, Asian Development Bank Institute, Inter-American Development Bank and Sage, New Delhi.

Marantidou, Virginia (2014), ‘Revisiting China’s “String of Pearls” Strategy: Places with Chinese Characteristicsand their Security Implications’, Issues & Insights, 14(7): 1-39.

Ministry of External Affairs (2013), ‘India-Philippines Relations’, Government of India, available at: http://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/ForeignRelation/Philippines__December_2013_.pdf(last accessed on March2, 2016).

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (undated), “Trade in Value Added (TIVA) database”, available at: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=TIVA_OECD_WTO (last accessed on February 17, 2016).

O'Rourke, Ronald (2015), ‘Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issuesfor Congress’, Congressional Research Service Report 42784, Washington DC.

Palit, Amitendu (2014a), ‘Regional Supply Chains in Asia: Examining India’s Presence and Possibilities in the RCEP’, Centre for WTO Studies Working Paper, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade: New Delhi.

Palit, Amitendu (2014b), ‘The RCEP Negotiations and India’, ISAS Brief No. 334, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore: Singapore.

Pant, Harsh V. (2015), ‘Modi’s outreach to three Indian Ocean states’, The Japan Times, March 22, Tokyo. Press Trust of India (2015), ‘China reacts sharply to Japan joining India-US naval drills’, Times of India, October 12, New Delhi.

Quintos, Mary Fides A. (2015), ‘Artificial Islands in the South China Sea and their impact on Regional (In)security’, FSI insights, 2(2): 1-11.

Rajendram, Danielle (2014), ‘India’s new Asia-Pacific strategy: Modi acts East’, Policy Paper, Lowy Institute for International Policy: Sydney.

Rehman, Iskander (2017), ‘India, China, and differing conceptions of the maritime order’, Project on International Order and Strategy, Brookings Institution: Washington DC.

Roche, Elizabeth (2018), ‘India marks 69th Republic Day with all Asean leaders in attendance’, Live Mint, January 26, 2018, Mumbai.

Roy Chaudhury, Dipanjan, ‘India, ASEAN leaders agree to boost maritime cooperation’, Economic Times, January 26, 2018, New Delhi.

Scott, David (2013), ‘India's Role in the South China Sea: Geopolitics and Geoeconomics in Play’, India Review, 12(2): 51-69.

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2011), ‘Fighting Irrelevance: The Role of Regional Trade Agreements in International Production Networks in Asia’, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Study, UNESCAP, New York.

World Trade Organisation (2011), ‘Trade patterns and global value chains in East Asia: From trade in goods to trade in tasks’, in collaboration with Institute of Developing Economies (IDE) and Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO), Geneva.