Is the Thai Government Revenue-Spending Nexus Asymmetric?

Jiranyakul, Komain (2018): Is the Thai Government Revenue-Spending Nexus Asymmetric?

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between government revenue and spending in Thailand using both linear and nonlinear cointegration techniques. A residual-based cointegration test with an unknown structural break is used to detect the linear long-run relationship between government revenue and spending. For nonlinear cointegration tests, both TAR and MTAR models are estimated. The empirical results from the estimate of the redidual-based test for cointegration suggest that there is the positive long-run relationship between government revenue and spending when revenue is dependent variable. However, the results from the estimates of the TAR and MTAR models show the absence of asymmetric adjustments towards the long-run equilibrium. Based upon the results of linear cointegration test, short-run dynamics indicate that any deviation from budgetary disequilibrium will be corrected. In causality sense, there is a short-run unidirectional causality running from government spending to revenue. The evidence appears to support the fiscal spend-and-tax hypothesis. This finding implies that policymakers should be careful in exercising expansionary fiscal policy measures because fiscal deficits will occur when revenue falls short of spending.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Government revenue and expenditures, cointegration, causality
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

Afonso, A. and Rault, C., 2009. “Spend-and-Tax: A Panel Datat Investigation for the EU,” Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 2542-2548.

Andrews, D.W., 1993. “Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Points,” Econometrica, 61(4), 821-856.

Arestis, P., Gipolini, A. and Fattouh, B., 2004. “Threshold Effects in the U. S. Budget Deficit,” Economic Inquiry, 42(2), 214-222.

Athanasenas, A., Katrakilidis, C. and Trachanas, E., 2014. “Government Spending and Reveues in the Greek Economy: Evidence from Non-Linear Cointegration,” Empirica, 41(2), 365-376.

Bai, J. and Perron, P., 1998. “Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes,” Econometrica, 66(1), 47-78.

Bai, J. and Perron, P., 2003. “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 1-22.

Chang, T., Liu, W. R. and Caudill, S., 2002. “Tax-and-Spend, Spend-and-Tax, or Fiscal Synchronization: New Evidence for Then Countries,” Applied Economics, 34(12), 1553-1561.

Cipolini, A., Fattouh, B. and Mouratidis, C., 2009. “Fiscal Readjustments in the United States: A Nolinear Time Series Analysis,” Economic Inquiry, 47(1), 34-54.

Cunado, J., Gil-Alana, L. A. and Gracia, F. P., 2004. “Is the US Fiscal Deficit Sustainable?: A Fractionally Integrated Approach,” Journal of Economics and Business, 56(6), 501-526.

Enders, W. and Granger, C. W. J., 1998. “Unit Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example using the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16(3), 304-311.

Enders, W. and Siklos, P., 2001. “Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19(2), 166-176.

Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J., 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.

Friedman, M., 1978. “The Limitations of Tax Limitation,” Policy Review, 5(1), 7-14.

Ghate, C. and Zak, P. J., 2002. “Growth of Government and the Politics of Fiscal Policy,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13(4), 345-455.

Hakkio, C. S. and Rush, M., 1991. “Is the Budget Deficit “Too Large”?,” Economic Inquiry, 29 (3), 429-445.

Hansen, B. and Seo, B., 2002. “Testing for Two-Regime Threshold Cointegration in Vector Error Correction Models, Journal of Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.

Hjalmarsson, E. and Osterholm, P., 2007. “Testing for cointegration using the Johansen methodology when variables are near-integrated,” IMF Working Paper 07/141.

Koren, S. and Stiassny, A., 1998. “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An International Study,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(2), 163-191.

MacKinnon, J., 1996. “Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.

Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. E., 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government,” Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927.

Musgrave, R., 1966. “Principles of Budget Determination,” in H. Cameron and W. Henderson (Eds.), Public Finance: Selected Readings, Random House, New York.

Paleologou, S., 2013. “Asymmetries in the Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: A Tale of Three Countries,” Economic Modelling, 30(C), 52-60.

Payne, J. E. and Saunoris, J. W., 2010. “Tax More or Spend Less? Asymmetries in the UK Revenue-Expenditure Nexus,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 32(4), 478-487.

Peacock, A. T. and Wiseman, J., 1979. “Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth,” Public Finance Quarterly, 7(1), 3-23.

Phillips, P. C. B., 1987. “Time Series Regression with a Unit Root,” Econometrica, 55(2), 227-301.

Prettucelli, J and Wollford, S., 1984. “A Threshold AR(1) Model. Journal of Applied Probability, 21(3), 273-286.

Quandt, R., 1960. “Tests for the Hypothesis that a Linear Regression Obeys Two Separate Regimes,” Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 55(-), 324-330.

Quintos, C. E., 1995. “Sustainability of the Deficit Process with Structural Shifts,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13(4), 409-417.

Roberts, P. C., 1978., “Idealism in Public Choice Theory,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 4(-), 603-615.

Saunoris, J. W., 2015. “The Dynamics of Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from the US State Government Finances,” Public Finance Review, 43(1), 108-134.

Tiwari, A. K. and Mutascu, M., 2016. “The Revenue-Spending Nexus in Romania: A TAR and MTAR Approach,” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 29(1), 735-745.