Fiscal Adjustments at the Local Level: Evidence from Colombia

Jaimes, Richard (2016): Fiscal Adjustments at the Local Level: Evidence from Colombia.

Abstract

Recent research suggests that intergovernmental grants, own-source revenues, and changes in government investment play an important role in helping local governments in advanced economies to adjust their fiscal positions in response to budget shocks. At the same time, little is known about the dynamic of fiscal adjustments at the local level in emerging economies, and there are reasons to expect distinct fiscal stabilization patterns, for instance, due to weaker institutional arrangements and lower fiscal capacity. However, using a panel data set of more than 900 municipalities in Colombia over the period 1985-2015, I find that in line with the results for developed countries (i) intergovernmental grants react significantly to increases in government spending; (ii) the response of own-source revenues to innovations in government spending in large cities is higher than in the small ones; (iii) government investment is highly volatile and responds remarkably to innovations in all other budgetary components; and (iv) there is no strong empirical evidence of a reduction in fiscal effort as a result of increases in intergovernmental grants.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fiscal adjustment; local fiscal policy; fiscal decentralization.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession

References

1. Acosta, O. L. and Bird, R. (2005). The dilemma of decentralization in colombia. In Bird, R., Poterba, J., and Slemrod, J., editors, Fiscal Reform in Colombia: Problems and Prospects, pages 247–286. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

2. Alesina, A. and Ardagna, S. (2010). Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending. In Brown, J. R., editor, Tax Policy and the Economy, volume 24, pages 35–68. University of Chicago Press.

3. Alesina, A. and Ardagna, S. (2013). The design of fiscal adjustments. In Moffitt, R. A., editor, Tax Policy and the Economy, volume 27, pages 19–67. University of Chicago Press.

4. Batalgi, B. H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, New York.

5.Bessho, S. and Ogawa, H. (2015). Fiscal adjustment in Japanese municipalities. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4):1053–1068.

6. Bird, R. M. (2012). Fiscal decentralization in Colombia: A work (still) in progress. International Center for Public Policy. WP, 12-23.

7. Bird, R. M. and Fiszbein, A. (2008). Colombia: the central role of the central government in fiscal decentralization. In Bird, R. M. and Vaillancourt, F., editors, Fiscal decentralization in developing countries, pages 172–205. Cambridge University Press.

8. Blume, L. and Voigt, S. (2011). Federalism and decentralization - a critical survey of frequently used indicators. Constitutional Political Economy, 22(3):238–264.

9. Bohn, H. (1991). Budget balance through revenue or spending adjustments? some historical evidence for the United States. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27:333–359.

10. Bohn, H. (2007). Are stationarity and cointegration restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint? Journal of Monetary Economics, 54:1837–1847.

11. Bonet-Morón, J., Pérez-Valbuena, G. J., and Ricciulli-Marin, D. (2017). ¿hay pereza fiscal territorial en Colombia? Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economá Regional y Urbana, Banco de la República, No. 261.

12. Buettner, T. (2009). The contribution of equalization transfers to fiscal adjustment: Empirical results for German municipalities and a US-German comparison. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37:417–431.

13. Buettner, T. and Wildasin, D. (2002). The dynamics of municipal fiscal adjustment. CESifo Working Paper Series 649.

14. Buettner, T. and Wildasin, D. (2006). The dynamics of municipal fiscal adjustment. Journal of Public Economics, 90:1115–1132.

15. Cadena, X. (2002). ¿la descentralización empereza? efecto de las transferencias sobre los ingresos tributarios municipales en Colombia. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, 50:67–108.

16. Channa, A. and Faguet, J.-P. (2012). Decentralization of health and education in developing countries: A quality-adjusted review of the empirical literature. EOPP 38. STICERD, London, UK.

17. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2):249–272.

18. Cortés, D. (2010). Do more centralized local governments do better? an evaluation of the 2001 decentralization reform in Colombia. Documentos de Trabajo, No. 007182. Universidad del Rosario.

19. Faguet, J.-P. and Sánchez, F. (2014). Decentralization and access to social services in Colombia. Public Choice, 160(1):227–249.

20. Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., and Sanz, I. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: Spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry, 51(4):1951–1931.

21. Glomm, G., Jung, J., and Tran, C. (2018). Fiscal austerity measures: Spending cuts vs. tax increases. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 22:501–540.

22. Hamilton, J. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.

23. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1):53–74.

24. Lutkepohl, H. (2005). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer-Verlag Berlin.

25. Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. Directions in Development. The World Bank.

26. Martín-Rodriguez, M. and Ogawa, H. (2017). The empirics of the municipal fiscal adjustment. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(3):831–853.

27. Martínez, L. R. (2016). Sources of revenue and government performance: Evidence from Colombia. Working Paper, LSE.

28. Mello, L. D. (2000). Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: A cross-country analysis. World Development, 28(2):365–380.

29. MinHacienda (2015). Responsabilidad fiscal subnacional y descentralización en colombia: Quince años de consolidación.

30. MinHacienda (2016). Efectos de la ley de reestructuración de pasivos (ley 550 de 1999) en las entidades territoriales.

31. Navon, G. (2006). Budgetary dynamics in the local authorities in Israel. Israel Economic Review, 2:19–52.

32. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic model with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6):1417–1426.

33. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22:265–312.

34. Rattso, J. (2004). Fiscal adjustment under centralized federalism: Empirical evaluation of the response to budgetary shocks. FinanzArchiv, 60:240–261.

35. Rodden, J. (2002). The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3):670–687.

36. Sánchez, F. (2006). Descentralización y progreso en el acceso a los servicios sociales de educación, salud y agua y alcantarillado. Documentos CEDE, No. 2006-15. Universidad de Los Andes.

37. Solé-Ollé, A. and Sorribas-Navarro, P. (2012). The dynamic adjustment of local government budgets: does Spain behave differently? Applied Economics, 44:3203–3213.

38. Villar, A. d., Liu, L., Mosqueira, E., and Schmid, J. P. (2013). Colombia: Subnational insolvency framework. In Canuto, O. and Liu, L., editors, Until Debt Do Us Part, chapter 5, pages 179–219. The World Bank, Washington DC.