Production Technology and Carbon Emission: Long run relation with Short run Dynamics

Dinda, Soumyananda (2015): Production Technology and Carbon Emission: Long run relation with Short run Dynamics. Published in: Journal of Applied Economics , Vol. 21, No. 1 (28 November 2018): pp. 106-121.

Abstract

What is the role of technological progress on reduction of CO2 emission? Question of linkage among carbon emission, income and technological progress is the main focuses on recent research area. Using vector error correction model (VECM), this paper investigates the long run relation with short run dynamics among CO2 emission, technological progress and economic growth. This study observes a specific kind of causality running from technological progress to CO2 emission in the USA during 1963 – 2010, while past income is the cause of rising carbon emission. Policy makers should emphasis on R & D for updated production technology which helps to reduce CO2 emission with raising income. Technological progress is the central force that causes income growth as well as emission reduction. Continuous change and adaption of new and updated technology is the main driving force toward sustainable development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Causality, Co-integration, CO2 Emission, Income, Innovation, Utility Patent, Technological Progress, R&D, Technology Adaption, USA, VECM
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O51 - U.S. ; Canada; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Andersson, Fredrik N. G., and Karpestam, Peter. (2013), “CO2 emissions and economic activity: Short- and long-run economic determinants of scale, energy intensity and carbon intensity”, Energy Policy, vol.61, 1285-1294.

Andreoni, J., and Levinson, A. (2001), “The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets curve”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.-80, pp269-286.

Apergis, N. and Payne, J.E. (2009), “Energy consumption and economic growth in central America: Evidence from a panel co-integration and error correction model”, Energy Economics, 31, 211-216.

Archibugi, D., and Coco, A. (2005), “Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A Survey and a manu for choice”, Research Policy, Vol.-34, pp175 – 194.

Archibugi, D., and Coco, A. (2004), “A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo)”, World Development, Vol.-32, No. 4, pp 629-654.

Ausubel, Jesse H. (1995), “Technological Progress and Climatic Change”, Energy Policy, vol.23(4/5), pp411-416.

Brock, W. A. and M. S. Taylor (2004), “The green Solow Model”, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Working paper 2004-16.

Brunnermeier, S. B., and Cohen, M. A. (2003), “Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol-45, pp278-293.

Burns, S. B., Gross, C. and Stern, D. (2013), “Is there really Granger Causality between energy use and output?”, Energy Journal, 354, 101-134.

Cao, Siwei. (2014), “Speed of Patent Protection, Rate of technical Knowledge obsolescence and Optimal Patent Strategy: Evidence from innovations patented in the US, China and several other countries”, Department of Agriculture and Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Job Market Paper.

Carrion-Flores, C. E., and Innes, R. (2010), “Environmental innovation and environmental performance”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.-59, pp27-42.

Cheng, B. S. (1999): “Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in India: An application of co-integration and error-correction modeling”, Indian Economic Review 34, pp39 - 49.

Cheng, B.S. (1996): “An Investigation of Co-integration and Causality between energy consumption and Economic Growth”, The Journal of Energy and Development 21(1), pp73 – 82.

Cheng, B. S. and T. W. Lai (1997): “An investigation of co-integration and causality between energy consumption and economic activity in Taiwan”, Energy Economics 19, pp435 - 444.

Coondoo, D. and S. Dinda (2002), “Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis”, Ecological Economics 40 (3), pp351 - 367.

Dagher, L. and Yacoubian, T. (2012), “The causal relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in Lebanon”, Energy Policy, 50, 795-801.

Dinda, S. (2004), “Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey”, Ecological Economics, 49(4), pp431-455.

Dinda, S., and Coondoo, D. (2006), Income and Emission: A Panel Data based Cointegration Analysis, Ecological Economics, vol.-57, no.2, 167-181.

Dinda, S. (2009a), “Climate Change and Human Insecurity”, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 9(1/2), pp103-109.

Dinda, S. (2009b), Technological Progress towards Sustainable Development, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Vol. 9, No.1-2, 145-150.

Enders, W. (1995): Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.

Engle, R.F., and Granger, C.W.J. (1987), “Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing”, Econometrica, Vol.-55, pp 251-276.

Fankhauser, S. and Tol, Richard S. J. (2005), “On Climate change and economic growth”, Resource and Energy Economics 27, pp1-17.

Granger, C.W.J. (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric models and cross-spectral methods”, Econometrica 37(3), pp424 – 438.

Griliches, Zvi. (1990), “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.-28, No. 4, pp1661 -1707.

Griliches, Zvi. (1998), “Patent statistics as economic indicators: A Survey”, in (edited by Zvi Griliches) R&D and Productivity: the Econometric Evidence, University of Chicago Press, pp287-343.

Grossman, G.M., and Krueger, A. B. (1991), “Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Paper No. 3914.

Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger (1995), “Economic growth and the Environment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2), pp353 - 377.

Hafner, K.A. (2005), “International Patent Pattern and Technology Diffusion”, Department of Economics, University of Bamberg, Germany.

Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. (2001), “Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools”, NBER working paper 8498.

Holtz-Eakin, D. and T. M. Selden (1995), “Stoking the fires?: CO2 emissions and economic growth”, Journal of Public Economics 57, pp85 - 101.

Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol.-12, pp231-254.

John, A. and R. Pecchenino (1994), “An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment”, Economic Journal 104, pp1393 - 1410.

Kalimeris, P., Richardson, C. and Bittas, K. (2014), “A Meta-Analysis investigation of the direction of the energy-GDP causal relationship: Implications for the growth-degrowth dialogue”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 67, 1-13.

Komen, R., Gerking, S. and Folmer, H. (1997), “Income and environmental R&D: empirical evidence from OECD countries”, Environment and Development Economics, Vol.-2, pp505–515.

Lall, Sanjaya. (1992), “Technological capabilities and Industrialization”, World Development, Vol.-20, No.- 2, pp165 – 186.

Levinson, Arik. (2009), “Technology, International Trade, and Pollution from US Manufacturing”, American Economic Review, Vol.-99, No.-5, pp2177 -2192.

Lindmark, M. (2002), “An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emissions, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden 1870 – 1997”, Ecological Economics 42, pp333 - 347.

Loschel, A. And Schymura, M. (2013), “Modeling technological change in economic models of climate change: A Survey”, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 13-007.

Loschel, A. (2002), “Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: A Survey”, Ecological Economics 43, pp105-126.

Maddala, G. S. and In-Moo Kim (1999), Unit roots, Co-integration and Structural change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

Mishra, G. S., Zakerinia, S., Yeh S., Teter, J., and Morrison, G. (2014), “Mitigating climate change: Decomposing the relative roles of energy conservation, technological change, and structural shift”, Energy Economics 44, pp448-455.

Moomaw, W. R. and G. C. Unruh (1997), “Are Environmental Kuznets Curve misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions”, Environment and Development Economics 2, pp451 – 463.

Ozturk, I. (2010), “A literature survey on energy-growth nexus”, Energy Policy, 38, 340-349.

Ozturk, I., Uddin, G.S. (2012), “Causality among Carbon Emissions, Energy Consumption and Growth in India, Economic Research, 25(3), 752-775.

Reis, A. B. (2001), “Endogenous Growth and the Possibility of Eliminating Pollution”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol-42, pp360 - 373.

Schmalensee, R., T. M. Stoker and R. A. Judson (1998), “World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 1950- 2050”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1), pp15-27.

Selden, T. M. and D. Song (1995): “Neoclassical growth, the J Curve for abatement, and the inverted -U Curve for pollution”, Journal of Environmental Economics and management 29, pp162 - 168.

Solow, R. M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.-70, No.-1, pp65-94.

Stern, David I. (2000), “A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy”, Energy Economics 22, pp267 - 283.

Stern, David I. (2004), “The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve”, World Development 32 (8), pp1419 1439.

Stokey, N. L. (1998), “Are there limits to Growth?”, International Economic Review 39(1), pp1 - 31.

Unruh, G. C. and W. R. Moomaw (1998), “An alternative analysis of apparent EKC -type transitions”, Ecological Economics 25, pp221 - 229.

World Bank (1992), World Development Report 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.

Yang, Hao-Yen (2000), “A note on the causal relationship between energy and GDP in Taiwan”, Energy Economics 22, pp309 – 317.