wani, Nassir ul and dhami, Jasdeep kaur (2016): Trade Potential of India against BRCS Economies: An empirical analysis based on Gravity Model.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91785.pdf Download (375kB) |
Abstract
This article sheds light on the potential of trade of India against BRCS economies by employing the Gravity Model. The study period is covering 22 years from 1995-2016. The gravity models for both 1995 and 2016 fit the data well and explain 75 percent and 76 percent of the variation in bilateral trade across sample of countries, respectively. The results are hetero-corrected, multicollinearity and auto correlation free. The coefficient of product of GDP, per capita GDP, and openness variable are positive and highly significant as expected whereas the dummy variable, RTA, is not found significant. The per capita GDP differential has negative and statistically significant effect on bilateral trade flows for both 2016 and 1995 data and support the Linder hypothesis. The results show that considerable potential exists on individual country basis. Thus, India needs to concentrate on trade from emerging countries that are liberalizing their markets for economic expansion.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trade Potential of India against BRCS Economies: An empirical analysis based on Gravity Model |
English Title: | Trade Potential of India against BRCS Economies: An empirical analysis based on Gravity Model |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | BRICS, Gravity model, Trade |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance |
Item ID: | 91785 |
Depositing User: | Dr Nassir ul Haq Wani |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jan 2019 10:40 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 00:54 |
References: | Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 106-116. Batra, A. (2004). India's global trade potential: The gravity model approach. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic relations. Bhattacharyya, R., & Banerjee, T. (2006). Does the Gravity Model Explain India’s Direction of Trade? A Panel Data Approach. Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India, (1-18). Bhattacharya, S.K., & Bhattacharyay, B.N. (2007). Gains and losses of India-China trade cooperation: A gravity model impact analysis. CESIFO Working Paper, 1-32. Christie, E. (2001). Potential trade in Southeast Europe: A gravity model approach. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies-WIIW, 1-38. Deardorff, A. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In J. A. Frankel, The Regionalization of the World Economy (pp. 7-32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Didier, L., & Hoarau, J.F. (2013). Determinants of bilateral trade between BRICs and Sub Saharan Africa: What the gravity model tells us? CEMOI, University of La Reunion., 1-20. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S.S. (1997). Technology and Bilateral Trade. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Eichengreen, B., & Irwin, D.A. (1998). The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows. In Jeffrey A. Frankel, The Regionalization of the World Economy (pp. 33-62). Berkeley: University of Chicago Press. Frankel, J. A. (1997). Extensions of the emperical analysis. In E. S.-J. Jeffrey A. Frankel, Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System (pp. 115-148). New York: Peterson Institute. Gull, N., & Yasin, H.M. (2011). The Trade Potential of Pakistan: An Application of the Gravity Model. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 23-62. Hassan, M. (2000). Trade relations with SAARC countries and trade policies of Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 99-151. Hassan, M. (2001). Is SAARC a viable economic block? Evidence from gravity model. Journal of Asian Economics, 263-290. Jakab, Z. M., Kovacs , M. A. & Oszlay, A. (2001). How far has trade integration advanced?: An analysis of the actual and potential trade of three Central and Eastern European countries. Journal of Comparative Economics , 276–292. Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company. Mazumdar, S. (2015). Warning signs for the economy: Recent trends in India's merchandise trade. Economic and Political Weekly, 1-5. Oguledo,V., & Macphee, C.R. (1994). Gravity models: A reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements. Journal of Applied Economics, 107-120. Paas, T. (2000). Gravity approach for modelling trade flows between Estonia and the main trading partners. University of Tartu, Faculty of Economics and Buisness Adminstration. Rahman, M. M. (2009). Australia’s global trade potential: Evidence from the Gravity Model analysis. Oxford Business & Economics Conference Program (pp. 1-41). Oxford: Oxford University Press, UK. Sharma, P., & Chua, Y. (2010). ASEAN: Economic integration and intra-regional trade. Journal of Applied Economic Letters, 165-169. Tripathi, S., & Leitao, N.C. (2013). India's Trade and Gravity Model: A Static and Dynamic Panel Data. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45502/ MPRA Paper No. 45502, posted 25 March 2013 10:52 UTC. Wani, N.U.H., Dhami, J.K., & Rehman, A.U. (2016). The determinants of India's Imports: A gravity model aproach. Munich Personel RePEc Archive, 1-14. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91785 |