TELAAH KEPEMILIKAN KEBENARAN ILMIAH PADA PENGEMBANGAN PENGETAHUAN AKUNTANSI

suhardi, suhardi (2017): TELAAH KEPEMILIKAN KEBENARAN ILMIAH PADA PENGEMBANGAN PENGETAHUAN AKUNTANSI. Published in: JEM Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen , Vol. 3, No. 2 (December 2017): pp. 68-79.

Abstract

This article aims to examine the conflicting paradigm in accounting research and development from the point of view of the philosophy of science. Each adherent is both mainstream and alternative, assuming that their point of view is the most scientific approach and more suitable for developing the discipline of accounting scholarship. This article also agrees on the use of a multiparadigm approach as a space for researchers so that it does not have to be trapped in a single point of view, it would be better to paradigm each other interact and synergize to produce strength. Accounting research and development can be approached from the point of view of the philosophy of science. From any point of view the paradigm used in researching and developing whether the mainstream or accounting alternative is a product of knowledge that has no absolute truth, so it is not necessary to differentiate the way of view in researching accounting into a contradiction that can negate the essence of epistemology, ontology, and axiology

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC TRUTH OWNERSHIP ON DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING KNOWLEDGE
• Language: Indonesian
• Keywords: scientific truth, multi-paradigmatic, philosophy of science
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M40 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M48 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

Asy’arie, Musa. 1999. Filsafat Islam: Sunah Nabi dalam Berpikir, Jogyakarta, LESFI. Burrell, G dan G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of theSociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational Books, London. Chua, Wai Fong. 1986. Radical Developments in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, Vol 61, No 4. Creswell, John, W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publication. New Dehli. Djamhuri, Ali. 2011. Ilmu pengetahuan sosial dan berbagai paradigma dalam kajian akuntansi. Gaffikin, Michael. 2005. Creating a Science of Accounting: accounting theory to 1970. UOW:School of Accounting & Finance. NSW 2522. Kuhn, Thomas. 2005. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Peran Paradigma Dalam Revolusi Sains). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Maksum, Ali. 2011. Pengantar Filsafat: Dari Masa Klasik Hingga Postmodernisme, Jakarta, AR Ruzz Media. Neuman, W Lawrence. 1997. Social Research Methods. Allyn and BaconUSA. Suhardi, Suhardi. (2015). Persepsi Pemakai Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Independensi Auditor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Jember, 10(2), 1-29. doi:10.19184/jauj.v10i2.1249. Suhardi dan Darus Altin. 2013.Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank BPR Konvensional di Indonesia Periode 2009 sampai 2012. Pekbis Jurnal. Vol. 5, No.2, Juli 2013: 101-110. Suwardi,Herman. 1999. Roda Berputar Roda Bergulir. Bandung, Bakti Mandiri. Suriasumantri,Jujun S. 1995. FilsafatIlmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta. Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Suriasumantri, Jujun S. 2001. Ilmudalam perspektif: Sebuah kumpulan karangan tentang Hakekat Ilmu. Jakarta. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Suparno, Paul. 1997. FilsafatKonstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan, Jogyakarta, Kanisius. Suwardjono. 2006. Teori Akuntansi. BPFE. Yogjakarta. Triyuwono, Iwan. 2006. Perspektif Metodologi dan Teori Akuntansi Syariah. RadjaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.