Nakagawa, Shintaro (2019): On the Maximum Number of Players Voluntarily Contributing to Two or More Public Goods.
PDF
MPRA_paper_92719.pdf Download (274kB) |
Abstract
Cornes and Itaya (2010) showed that in a two-player game of voluntary provision of two public goods if the players have different preferences, and if both players simultaneously make positive contributions to both public goods, the system of equations representing the Nash equilibrium is overdetermined. We extend this proposition to a model of voluntary provision of two or more public goods and show that if the players have different preferences, and if the number of players who contribute simultaneously to two or more public goods is more than the number of public goods, the system representing the Nash equilibrium is overdetermined. This result implies that in a large group, the share of players contributing to multiple public goods may well be quite small and the majority of the players may contribute to at the most one public good.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the Maximum Number of Players Voluntarily Contributing to Two or More Public Goods |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Voluntary provision; multiple public goods |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods |
Item ID: | 92719 |
Depositing User: | Shintaro Nakagawa |
Date Deposited: | 15 Mar 2019 17:27 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 02:27 |
References: | Andreoni, J. and M. C. McGuire (1993) Identifying the free riders: A simple algorithm for determining who contribute to a public good, Journal of Public Economics, 51(3), pp. 447-454, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90076-6. Bergstrom, T., L. Blume and H. Varian (1986) On the private provision of public goods, Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), pp. 25-49, https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(86)90024-1. Cornes, R. and J. Itaya (2010) On The Private Provision of Two or More Public Goods, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12 (2), pp. 363–385, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2009.01455.x. Cornes, R. C. and A. G. Schweinberger (1996) Free riding and the inefficiency of the private production of pure public goods, Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), pp. 70-91, https://doi.org/10.2307/136152. Dasgupta, I. and R. Kanbur (2005) Bridging communal divides: Separation, patronage, and integration, in C. B. Barrett eds. The Social Economics of Poverty: On identities, communities, groups and networks, Routledge: Abingdon. Ihori, T., M. C. McGuire and S. Nakagawa (2014) International Security, Multiple Public Good Provisions, and The Exploitation Hypothesis, Defence and Peace Economics, 25(3), pp. 213-229, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2012.752229. Kemp, M.C.(1984) A note of the theory of international transfers, Economics Letters, 14(2-3), pp. 259-262, https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(84)90092-2. McGuire, M.C. (1991) Identifying the free riders: How to partition a group into positive and zero contributors to the common good, University of Maryland Working paper, 91-14. McGuure, M.C. and C. H. Groth, Jr. (1985) A method for identifying the public good allocation process within a group, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100(Supplement), pp. 915-934, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/100.Supplement.915. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/92719 |