Potential output, capital input and U.S. economic growth

Bitros, George C. (2019): Potential output, capital input and U.S. economic growth.

Abstract

The objective in this paper is to highlight the complex linkages of capital input to potential output in the U.S. nonfarm private business sector. For this purpose the analytical framework used by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is adapted and re-estimated using data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) over the period 1949-2016. By focusing on the changes in the composition of the capital stock in terms of structures, equipment and intangibles, average service lives, and the relative prices of producer’s to consumer’s goods, the paper allows for their influence on the capital input and traces the latter’s effects on the potential output. It is found that: (a) when the capital input is adjusted to reflect all aforementioned changes, the potential output decelerated in recent decades even faster than suggested by CBO’s estimates; (b) in the post-2007 period the shortfall in the estimated potential output widened relative to that computed by CBO, and (c) the faster deceleration of the potential output emanated from the declining share of structures in the capital stock and the spectacular decline in the prices of equipment relative to structures. Drawing on these findings it is concluded that, although the real economy may have overshoot its potential in the last few years, the forces that slow down potential output through changes in the capital input remain intact and, unless some remedial policies are instituted, they will continue to function as significant headwinds to U.S. economic growth, along with all others that are well known.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Potential output, capital input, capital stock, economic growth, economic growth headwinds, secular stagnation
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence

References

Bitros, G. C., Flytzanis, E. G., (2009). “Operating policies in a model with terminal scrapping,” European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 551-573.

Bitros, G. C., Nadiri, M. I., (2017a), “Elasticities of business investment in the U.S. and their policy implications: A disaggregate approach to modeling and estimation,” in https://www.dept.aueb.gr/sites/default/files/econ/dokimia/wp07-2017-Bitros-Nadiri-150617.pdf .

--------------------------, (2017b), “Behavior of business investment in the USA under variable and proportional rates of replacement,” in http://www.econ.aueb.gr/en/uploadfiles/wp08-2017-Bitros-Nadiri-180617.

Bloomberg, M. R., (2017), “This Tax Bill Is a Trillion-Dollar Blunder,” in https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-12-15/this-tax-bill-is-a-trillion-dollar-`blunder.

Fraumeni, B. M., Jorgenson, D. W., (1980), “The role of capital in U.S. economic Growth, 1948-1976). In George M. von Furstenberg (Ed.) Capital, Efficiency and Growth, Cambridge Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Company, 9-200.

Gordon, R. J., (2012), “Is U.S. Economic Growth Over? Faltering Innovation Confronts the Six Headwinds,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper 18325.

-------------------, (2014a), “US Economic Growth is Over: The Short Run meets the Long Run,” in THINK TANK 20: Growth, Convergence and Income Distribution: The Road from the Brisbane G-20 Summit, https://www.brookings.edu/.../2016/07/tt20-united-states-economic-growth-gordon.pdf .

-------------------, (2014b), “A New Method of Estimating Potential Real GDP Growth: Implications for the Labor Market and the Debt/GDP ratio,” National Bureau of Economic Re-search, Working paper 20423.

------------------, (2015a), “Secular Stagnation on the Supply Side: U.S. Productivity in the Long Run,” Digiworld Economic Journal, 100, 19-45.

------------------, (2015b), Beyond the Rainbow: The Rise and Fall of Growth in the American Standard of Living, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Coy, P., (2017), “Growth Is Gangbusters, but Some Economists Are Still Warning about ‘Secular Stagnation”,”https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-19/growth-is-gangbusters-but-some-economists-are-still-warning-about-secular-stagnation.

Jorgenson, D. W., (1963), "Capital Theory and Investment Behavior," American Economic Re-view, 53, 247-259.

------------------------, (1991), “Productivity and Economic growth,” in Ernst R. Berndt and Jack E. Triplett (Eds.), Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on research in Income and Wealth, National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago Ill: University of Chicago Press, 19-118.

Jorgenson, D. W., Stephenson, J. A., (1967), “Investment Behavior in U.S. Manufacturing, 1947-1960,” Econometrica, 35, 169-220.

Summers, L. H., (2013a), “IMF Fourteen Annual Research in Honor of Stanley Fisher,” in Http://larrysummers.com/imf-fourteen-annual-research-in-honor-of-stanley-fisher/.

----------------------, (2013b), ‘Why stagnation might prove to be the new normal,” in Http://larrysummers.com/commentary/financial-times-columns/why-stagnation-might-prove-to-be-the-new-normal/.

-----------------------, (2014a), “U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound,” Business Economics, 49, 65–73.

-----------------------, (2014b), “Bold Reform Is the Only Answer to Secular Stagnation.” Financial Times, September 8. -----------------------, (2017), “Secular Stagnation Project,” www.ineteconomics.org .

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, (1983), Trends in multifactor productivity 1948-81, Bulletin 2178, Bulletin 2, 178.

U.S. Congressional Budget Office, (2001), CBO’S method for estimating potential output: An update, The Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office.

Wasshausen, D. B., Samuels, J. D., Stewart, J., Strassner, E. H., (2016), “Estimating capital services in the U.S.: An empirical assessment of implementation difference,” Paper prepared for the 34th IARIW General Conference, Dresden, Germany, August 21-27, 2016.