Estimating the Scope Elasticity of Multinational Firms: An Empirical Assessment

Fariñas, José C. and Martín-Marcos, Ana and Velázquez, Francisco J. (2019): Estimating the Scope Elasticity of Multinational Firms: An Empirical Assessment.

Abstract

This paper offers an empirical assessment of the scope elasticity of multinational activity at the world level. By scope elasticity, we refer to the relationship between the productivity of the parent firm and the probability of operating in a given foreign market through subsidiaries with the same main activity. Elasticities are estimated for a baseline cross-section of 36 countries that represent 74% of total outward FDI investment at the world level. At the aggregate level, results indicate quite consistently, through various estimation methods, that a 10% increase in productivity of the parent firm increases the probability in a range between 0.8-1.5%. Elasticities for manufacturing more than double the elasticities for the service sector. The paper also explores the heterogeneity of scope elasticities across home countries and sectors. This heterogeneity is related to differences across bilateral home-host country characteristics such as the size of the potential host market, bilateral distance, average tariff, institutional quality of host countries and other factors. The signs attached to these factors are in general consistent with the predictions of models of firm heterogeneity and FDI activity. Once heterogeneity and survey biases are controlled, scope elasticities reduce somewhat.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Foreign Direct Investment, Scope Elasticity of Multinational Corporations, Productivity.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M16 - International Business Administration

References

Antràs, P. & S. R. Yeaple (2014). Multinational firms and the structure of international trade. Handbook of International Economics, 4, 55-130.

Arnold J. M. & K. Hussinger (2010). Exports versus FDI in German manufacturing firm performance and participation in international markets. Review of International Economics, 18, 559-606.

Aw, B. & Y. Lee (2008). Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 76, 403-415.

Barba Navarreti, G. & J. A. Venable (2004). Multinational firms in the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Barrios, S., H. Huizinga, L. Laeven & G. Nicodème (2009). International taxation and mulitnational firm location decisions. European Economy, Economic Papers 356, January. Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission.

Berden, K., J. H. Bergstrand & E. van Etten (2014). Governance and globalization. The World Economy, 37, 3, 353-386.

Blonigen, B. (2005). A review of the empirical literature on FDI. NBER Working Paper 11299.

Blonigen & Piger (2014). Determinants of foreign direct investment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 47, 3, 775-812.

Borin, A. & M. Mancini (2016). FDI and firm performance: An empirical analysis of Italian firms. The Review of World Economics, 152, 705-732.

Brainard, S. L. (1993). A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 4269.

Brainard, S. L. (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review, 87, 4, 520-544.

Cameron, A. C. & P. K. Trivedi (2005). Microeconometrics methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Castellani, D. & G. Giovanetti (2010). Productivity and the international firm: Dissecting heterogeneity. Journal of Economy Policy Reform, 13, 1, 25-42.

Chen, M. X. & M. Moore (2010). Location decision of heterogeneous multinational firms. Journal of International Economics, 80, 188-199.

Damijan, J., C. Kostevc & M. Rojec (2016). Not every kind of outward FDI increases parent firm productivity: The case of new EU members. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53, I, 397-422.

Engel, D. & V. Procher (2012). Export, FDI and firm productivity. Applied Economics, 44:55, 1931-1940.

Faeth, I. (2009). Determinants of FDI: A tale of nine theoretical models. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 1, 165-196.

Fariñas, J. C. & A. Martín-Marcos (2010). Foreign sourcing and productivity: evidence at the firm level. World Economy, 33, 3, 482-506.

Fariñas, J. C., A. Martín-Marcos & F. J. Velázquez (2018). Multinational activity of European firms and heterogeneity. The World Economy, 41-1, 1166-1195.

Geishecker, I., H. Görg & D. Taglioni (2009). Characterising Euro area multinationals. The World Economy, 32, 1, 49-76.

Girma, S., H. Görg & E. Strobl (2004). Exports, international investment, and plant performance: Evidence from a non-parametric test. Economic Letters, 83, 3, 317-324.

Girma, S., R. Kneller & M. Pisu (2005). Exports vs. FDI: An empirical test. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 141, 193-218.

Görg, H. (2016). Multinational enterprises and host country development. World Scientific Studies in International Economics: Volume 53. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Greenaway, D. & R. Kneller (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. Economic Journal, 117, 134-161.

Gullstrand, J., K. Olofsdotter & S. Thede (2016). Importers, exporters and multinationals: Exploring the hierarchy of international linkages. Open Economies Review, 27, 3, 495-514.

Head, K. & T. Mayer (2004). Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 4, 959-972.

Head, K. & T. Mayer (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkits and cookbook. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics (v. 4, 131-196). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hyun, H. J. & J. Hur (2013). Who goes, where and how? Firms and country characteristics in the choice of FDI type and location. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 27, 2.

Helpman, E., M. Melitz & S. R. Yeaple (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94, 300-316.

Kano, L. & A. Verveke (2019). Theories of the multinational firm: A microfoundational perspective. Global Strategy Journal, 9, 117-147.

Kleinert, J. & F. Toubal (2010). Gravity for FDI. Review of International Economics, 18, 1, 1-13.

Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay & M. Mastruzzi (2010). The worldwide governance indicators methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper 5430. The World Bank.

Mayer, T. & S. Zignano (2011). Notes on CEPII´s distance measures: The GeoDist database. CEPII Working Paper, N°2011-25, December 2011.

Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725.

Nishiyama, H. & M. Tamaguchi (2013). Technological constraints, firm heterogeneity and location choice of multinational firms. Review of International Economics, 21, 5, 996-1005.

Oczkowski E. & H. Doucouliagos (2015). Wine prices and quality ratings: A meta-regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97, 1, 103-121.

OECD (2005), OECD Handbook on Economic Globalization Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Pinto-Ribeiro, S., S. Menghinello & K. De Backer (2010). The OECD ORBIS data base: Responding to the need for firm-level micro-data in the OECD. OECD Statistics Working Papers 2010/1. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Shao, Y. & Y. Shang (2016). Decisions of outward engagement and location for heterogeneous multinational firms: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 12, 178-187.

Stanley, T. D. (2005). Beyond publication bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 3, 309-345.

Stanley, T. D. & H. Doucouliagos (2012). Meta-regression analysis in economics and business. Oxford, England: Routledge.

Stanley, T. D. & H. Doucouliagos (2017). Neither fixed nor random: Weighted least squares meta-regression. Research Synthesis Methods, 8, 19-42.

Tanaka, A. (2012). Firm productivity and the number of FDI destinations: Evidence from a non-parametric test. Economics Letters, 117, 1-3.

Tanaka, A. (2015). Firm heterogeneity and FDI in distribution services. The World Economy, 38, 8, 1295-1311.

Tomiura, E. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics, 72, 206-215.

United Nations (1999). Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use. Retrieved from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/

UNCTAD (2018). World Investment Report 2018, Investment and New Industrial Policy. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.

Wilson, P. (2015). The misuse of the Voung test for non-nested models to test for zero-inflation. Economic Letters, 127, 51-53.

World Trade Organization (2018). World Trade Report 2018. Retrieved from: www.wto.org.

World Economic Forum (2011). The Global Competitiveness Report, 2010-2011. Geneva, Switzerland: WEF.

Yeaple, S. R. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. multinational activity. Journal of International Economics, 78, 206-215.