Dumitriu, Ramona and Stefanescu, Răzvan (2019): The extended Friday the 13th Effect in the US stock returns.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95296.pdf Download (545kB) |
Abstract
The classical Friday the 13th Effect refers to a calendar anomaly of financial markets which is generated by the fear of bad luck shared by the superstitious investors. As a result of their behavior, the returns from the supposed unlucky day of Friday the 13th are significant lower than those from the other Fridays. The superstition could also affect the returns from the trading days there are adjacent to Friday the 13th. In order to avoid the bad luck, some investors sell their stocks a trading day before and their transactions lead to a fall of the prices. Those who are reluctant to buy stocks on Friday the 13th delay such transactions to the next trading day causing prices to rise. In time, the knowledge about this pattern could induce significant changes in investors’ behavior, even to those that are not superstitious. Once become aware that one trading day before Friday the 13th the stock prices are usually low, many investors would prefer to sell two or three trading days before. There also were investors that would buy stocks not one trading day after Friday the 13th, when the prices are expected to be high, but two or three trading days after. Other investors could exploit the opportunities to buy cheap on Friday the 13th or one trading day before or to sell high one trading day after and their transactions could attenuate the abnormal returns from these days. In such ways the classical form of Friday the 13th Effect could be replaced by an extended form which consists in abnormal returns for a specific time interval that starts some trading days before the supposed unlucky day and ends some trading days after. This paper explores the behavior of the stock returns of 42 companies, from seven sectors of the United States economy, in the period January 2010 – March 2019, for a time interval that starts three trading days before Friday the 13th and ends three trading days after. The results indicate, for many of them, significant low returns in some trading days before Friday the 13th and/or significant high returns some trading days after. We also found some particularities of the extended Friday the 13th Effect among the seven sectors.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The extended Friday the 13th Effect in the US stock returns |
English Title: | The extended Friday the 13th Effect in the US stock returns |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Extended calendar anomalies, US stock returns, Friday the 13th Effect |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G14 - Information and Market Efficiency ; Event Studies ; Insider Trading G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G19 - Other |
Item ID: | 95296 |
Depositing User: | Ramona Dumitriu |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jul 2019 07:16 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 04:42 |
References: | Abraham, A., & Ikenberry, D. L. (1994). The individual investor and the weekend effect. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(2), 263-277. Agrawal, A., & Tandon, K. (1994). Anomalies or Illusions? Evidence from Stock Markets in Eighteen Countries.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 13, 83-106. Akaike, H. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike (pp. 199-213). Springer, New York. Borowski, K. (2019). Should investors be superstitious?, International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 11, No. 1. Breusch, T. S., & Godfrey, L. G. (1980). A review of recent work on testing for autocorrelation in dynamic economic models. Southampton University Discussion Paper in Economics and Econometrics No 6017. Chamberlain, T. W., Cheung, C. S. & Kwan, C. C. Y., (1991). The Friday the thirteenth effect: Myth or reality? Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 30, pp. 111-117. Dumitriu, R., & Stefanescu, R. (2019). Stock prices behavior before and after Friday the 13th. International Conference" Risk in Contemporary Economy 2019, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3396145 Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427-431. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1057-1072. Dimson, E., & Marsh, P. (1999). Murphy's Law and Market Anomalies. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 25(2), 53-69. Dyl, E. A., & Maberly, E. D. (1988). The anomaly that isn't there: a comment on Friday the thirteenth. Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1285-1286. Fama, E. (1965). The Behaviour of Stock Market Prices, Journal of Business 38(1), 34-105. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2008). Dissecting anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1653-1678. Jacobs, B. I., & Levy, K. N. (1988). Calendar anomalies: Abnormal returns at calendar turning points. Financial Analysts Journal, 44(6), 28-39. Kolb, R. W., & Rodriguez, R. J. (1987). Friday the Thirteenth:Part VII'-A Note. The Journal of Finance, 42(5), 1385-1387. Lakonishok, J., & Smidt, S. (1988). Are seasonal anomalies real? A ninety-year perspective. The review of Financial Studies, 1(4), 403-425. Lucey, B. M. (2000). Friday the 13th and the philosophical basis of financial economics. Journal of Economics and Finance, 24(3), 294-301. Lucey, B. M. (2001). Friday the 13th: International evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 8(9), 577-579. Lucey, B. M., & Pardo, A. (2005). Why investors should not be cautious about the academic approach to testing for stock market anomalies. Applied Financial Economics, 15(3), 165-171. Marquering, W., Nisser, J., & Valla, T. (2006). Disappearing anomalies: a dynamic analysis of the persistence of anomalies. Applied Financial Economics, 16(4), 291-302. Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631-653. Olson, D., Chou, N., & Mossman, C. (2010). Life cycle of the weekend effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 21, 542-422. Patel, J. B. (2009). Recent evidence on Friday the thirteenth effect in US stock returns. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 7(3). Peltomäki, J., & Peni, E. (2010) Friday the thirteenth and the stock market. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Vaasa. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1567662 Patel, N., & Sewell, M. (2015). Calendar anomalies: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 5(2), 99-121. Schwert, G. W. (2003). Anomalies and market efficiency. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 939-974. Stefanescu, R. & Dumitriu, R. (2018). Exploiting superstition in the investment strategies: case of Friday the 13th effect. The XI International & Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference, Vanguard Scientific Instruments in Management '2018, 11-16 September 2018, Ravda, Bulgaria. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285485 Tan, R. S. K., & Tat, W. N. (1998). The diminishing calendar anomalies in the stock exchange of Singapore. Applied Financial Economics, 8(2), 119-125 Vyse, S. A. (1997). Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford University Press, New York. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 817-838. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95296 |