Atanasov, Atanas (2019): Последващо оценяване на репутацията – преглед на съществуващата нормативна уредба. Published in: Управление и образование , Vol. 15, No. 1 (2019): pp. 102-110.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95329.pdf Download (327kB) |
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to review and analyze existing practices in the accounting regulation of post-reputation accounting as one of the major problems in the field of accounting harmonization by not aiming to critically analyze individual regulations in terms of their relevance. The objective analysis of the reviewed regulations allows us to summarize that the existing order for carrying out the ex post evaluation of the reputation and the specified disclosure elements are very important in order to obtain real indications of the business situation and the need for impairment but on the other hand they are extremely sensitive and easy to manipulate, as they use internal assumptions and assessments of enterprise management that are extremely difficult to verify. We believe that this is one of the main prerequisites for changing the regime in subsequent accounting for goodwill.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Последващо оценяване на репутацията – преглед на съществуващата нормативна уредба |
English Title: | Subsequent Evaluation Of Goodwill - Overview Of Existing Accounting Legislation |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Keywords: | goodwill accounting, subsequent evaluation, IFRS, FASB |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M40 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M48 - Government Policy and Regulation |
Item ID: | 95329 |
Depositing User: | Atanas Atanasov |
Date Deposited: | 09 Aug 2019 16:04 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 00:22 |
References: | 1. Cooper, J. 2007. Debating Accounting Principles and Policies: TheCase of Goodwill, 1880–1921, Accounting, Business & Financial History, 17:2, 241-264. 2. Deloitte. 2004. Business combinations.A Guide to IFRS 3, Deloitte, August, 2004. 3. EFRAG. 2014. All, Should Goodwill Still not be Amortised ? Accounting and Disclosure for Goodwill, EFRAG, ASBJ, OIC, July, 2014. 4. FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No.2014-02,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Accounting for Goodwill a consensus of the Private Company Council, January 2014. 5. Goodwill Impairment: What Happens When U.S. GAAP and IFRSs Clash?, Available from:http://deloitte.wsj.com/cfo/2013/03/25/goo dwill-impairment-what-happens-when-u-s-gaapand- ifrss-clash/, видяна на 11.06.2017. 6. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. 7. Георгиева, Д.. 2016. Счетоводна обезценка на нетекущите активи, Наука и икономика, Варна. 8. Коупленд, Т. и др. 2005. Стоймость компаний – оценка и управление, ЗАО „Олимп-Бизнес“. 9. Международен стандарт за финансово отчитане за малки и средни предприятия (МСФО за МСП). 10. МСС 36 – Обезценка на активи, Регламент (ЕО) № 1126/2008 на Комисията от 3 ноември 2008 година, посл. изм. доп. Регламент (ЕС) № 243/2010 на Комисията от 23 март 2010 година. 11. НСС 36 – Обезценка на активи, ДВ бр.86 от 26.10.2007. 12. Тодоров, Л. 2005. Методи за оценка стойността на предприятието, Български счетоводител, 23, 16-23. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95329 |