Heterogeneity and the Provision of a Public Good in Leading and Lagging Regions

Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Yoo, Seung Jick (2019): Heterogeneity and the Provision of a Public Good in Leading and Lagging Regions.

Abstract

The literature on leading and lagging regions has paid scant attention to how heterogeneity between the two regions impacts the provision of a public good. Given this lacuna, our contribution is to construct a game-theoretic model of an aggregate economy consisting of a leading and a lagging region and to then analyze this model. We show how two kinds of heterogeneity affect the provision of a public good such as higher education. In addition, we focus on decentralized and centralized public good provision and comment on the resulting welfare implications. We obtain two key conclusions. First, under decentralization, there exist several situations in which it is optimal for only one region to provide the public good. Second, under centralization, this exclusive provision is not optimal but the amount of the public good provided can be larger or smaller than the amount provided under decentralization. Our research tells policymakers that population size and values differences between the two regions and the use of majority voting are key factors to consider when pondering the optimal provision of a public good.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Centralization, Decentralization, Lagging Region, Leading Region, Public Good
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies

References

Batabyal, A.A. 2018. A note on local public good induced spillovers between a leading and a lagging region, Regional Science Inquiry, 10, 11-16.

Batabyal, A.A., and Beladi, H. 2019. The optimal provision of information and communication technologies in smart cities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 216-220.

Batabyal, A.A., Kourtit, K., and Nijkamp, P. 2019. New technological knowledge, rural and urban agriculture, and steady state economic growth, Networks and Spatial Economics, 19, 717-729.

Batabyal, A.A., and Nijkamp, P. 2014a. Technology, learning, and long run economic growth in leading and lagging regions, Economic and Political Weekly, 49, 92-96.

Batabyal, A.A., and Nijkamp, P. 2014b. Some properties of the technology gap between leading and lagging regions, Theoretical Economics Letters, 4, 1-6.

Batabyal, A.A., and Nijkamp, P. 2019. The magnification of a lagging region’s initial economic disadvantages on the balanced growth path. Forthcoming, Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science.

Becker, K., Hyland, P., and Soosay, C. 2013. Labour attraction and retention in rural and remote Queensland communities, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 19, 342-368.

Cornes, R., and sandler, T. 1985. The simple analytics of pure public good provision, Economica, 52, 103-116.

Dawid, H., Harting, P., and Neugart, M. 2014. Economic convergence: Policy implications from a heterogeneous agent model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 44, 54-80.

Desmet, K., and Ortin, I.O. 2007. Rational underdevelopment, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109, 1-24.

Dittmar, J.E., and Meisenzahl, R.R. 2019. Public good institutions, human capital, and growth. Forthcoming, Review of Economic Studies.

Gibbons, R. 1992. A Primer in Game Theory. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hertfordshire, UK.

Goddard, J., Robertson, D., and Vallance, P. 2012. Universities, technology and innovation centers and regional development: The case of the north-east of England, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, 609-627.

Hindriks, J., and Myles, G.D. 2013. Intermediate Public Economics, 2nd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Hirshleifer, J., Glazer, A., and Hirshleifer, D. 2005. Price Theory and Applications, 7th edition. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Kalirajan, K. 2004. Economic reform and the transmission of growth impulses across Indian states, International Journal of Social Economics, 31, 623-636.

Kunaka, C., and Arenas, G. 2010. Logistics in lagging regions, Report Number 58852, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Lall, S.V. 1999. The role of public infrastructure investments in regional development, Economic and Political Weekly, 34, 717-725.

Lall, S.V. Timmins, C., and Yu, S. 2009. Connecting lagging and leading regions: The role of labor mobility, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 151-174.

Liu, A. 2016. Remaking Economic Development: The Markets and Civics of Continuous Growth and Prosperity. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.

OECD. 2018. Rural 3.0. A Framework for Rural Development. OECD, Paris, France.

Pasquerella, L. 2016. Higher education should be a public good, not a private commodity, The Washington Post, October 20.

Pugh, R. 2017. Universities and economic development in lagging regions: ‘triple Helix’ policy in Wales, Regional Studies, 51, 982-993.

Rodriguez-Pose, A., and Crescenzi, R. 2008. Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe, Regional Studies, 42, 51-67.

Rodriguez-Pose, A., and Wilkie, G. 2019. Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America, Growth and Change, 50, 4-37.

Smulders, S. 2004. International capital market integration: Implications for convergence, growth, and welfare, International Economics and Economic Policy, 1, 173-194.

World Bank. 2009. World Development Report: Reshaping Economic Geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.