Anti-Corruption Reforms and Microfinancing: Evidence from Households' Fintech Borrowing

Zhang, Yifei (2019): Anti-Corruption Reforms and Microfinancing: Evidence from Households' Fintech Borrowing.

Abstract

Despite a surging literature in investigating different impacts of corruption and/or anti-corruption from firms’ perspective, it is still unclear whether and how corruption and/or anti-corruption affect households’ borrowing behaviour. In this paper, we focus on a Chinese online peer-to-peer lending market and analyse the impact of the recent China’s anti-corruption campaign on households’ borrowing costs. We employ a Difference-in-Differences (DID) estimation strategy and investigate three exogenous shocks regarding the movement: 1) the 2012 Eight Point Policy announcement; 2) multiple rounds of the Central Inspection Team Campaigns during 2013 and 2014; 3) and the anti-corruption rules for military-related personnel in early 2015. Our results show that equilibrium interest rates of borrowers pertaining to Non-SOEs dropped significantly comparing to that of SOEs and/or government agencies in the wake of the first two events. Borrowers affiliating with military-related institutions were also worsened after the military specific anti-corruption campaign. Finally, we examine the two possible economic channels. Suggestive evidences show that both a rise of interest risk premium for SOEs borrowers and a better outlook of Non-SOEs after the anti-corruption reform could account for the observed favour of the borrowing costs towards Non-SOEs borrowers. These findings are consistent with previous studies regarding the effects of anti-corruptions from firms’ aspects such as Lin et al., (2016) and Griffin et al., (2016). This study also complements the P2P literature by demonstrating the importance of online borrowers’ occupations / job affiliations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Peer-to-Peer Crowdfunding; Corruption; Household Debt
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D14 - Household Saving; Personal Finance; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption

References

Selected References Agarwal, Sumit, Qian, Wenlan, Seru, Amit, & Zhang, Jian, 2018, Disguised corruption: Evidence from consumer credit in China. Working Paper. Bu, Di., Hanspal, Tobin & Liao, Yin, 2019, Political Corruption and Household Finance. Butler, Alexander W, Fauver, Larry, & Mortal, Sandra, 2009, Corruption, political connections, and municipal finance. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(7), 2873– 2905. Cao, X., Wang, Y., & Zhou, S., 2018, Anti-corruption campaigns and corporate information release in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 49, 186-203. Chen, X., Qin, Y., Xiao, H., & Zhang, Y.,2019, Microfinancing and Home-Purchase Restrictions: Evidence from the Online'Peer-to-Peer'Lending in China. Available at SSRN 3429030. Ding, H., Fang, H., Lin, S., & Shi, K., 2017, Equilibrium consequences of corruption on firms: Evidence from China’s anti-corruption campaign. Working Paper. University of Pennsylvania. Ellis, Jesse A, Smith, Jared D, & White, Roger M., 2017, Corruption and corporate innovation. Working Paper. Fan, G., Wang, X., Zhu, H., 2011, NERI index of marketization of China’s provinces: 2011 report (in Chinese). Beijing Economic Science Press. Fisman, Raymond, & Svensson, Jakob., 2007, Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 83(1), 63–75. Gan, W., & Xu, X., 2019, Does anti-corruption campaign promote corporate R&D investment? Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 30, 292-296. Giannetti, Mariassunta, Liao, Guanmin, You, Jiaxing, & Yu, Xiaoyun, 2017, The externalities of corruption: Evidence from entrepreneurial activity in China. NBER Working Paper. Griffin, J., Liu, C., & Shu, T., 2016, Is the Chinese anti-corruption campaign effective. University of Texas, Austin. Hunt, Jennifer, & Laszlo, Sonia., 2005, Bribery: Who Pays, Who Refuses, What Are the Payoffs? NBER Working Paper Iyer R, Khwaja AI, Luttmer EF, Shue K, 2015, Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers., Management Science, 62, 1554-1577. Jinyan, H., Weishi, S., 2017, The Rational Consciousness and Balance Behavior of Investors in P2P Lending -An Empirical Analysis Based on The Data Of "P2P Lending". Financial Research. 86-104 (In Chinese) Ke, B., Liu, N., & Tang, S. (2016). The effect of anti-corruption campaign on shareholder value in a weak institutional environment: Evidence from China. Unpublished Working Paper. Kong, Dongmin, Wang, Li, & Wang, Maobin, 2017, Elects of anti-corruption on firm performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Finance Research Letters, 23, 190-195. Li, Bo, Wang, Zhengwei, & Zhou, Hao, 2017, China's Anti-Corruption Campaign and Credit Reallocation to Non-SOEs. Working Paper.