Ho, Sy-Hoa and Nguyen, Trung-Thanh and To-The, Nguyen (2020): Asymmetry and Symmetry of real exchange rate effect on the bilateral trade balance between Vietnam and the United States: aggregated and disaggregated levels of investigation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98416.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Bilateral trade balance always deserves particular interest of policy makers and economists. In this paper, we examined the asymmetric and symmetric effect of real exchange rate on bilateral trade balance between Vietnam and the US at both aggregated and disaggregated commodity levels. We employed both Linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) and Non-linear ARDL (NARDL) models to a dataset spanning over 18 years. We found that (i) both symmetry and asymmetry of real exchange rates are not significant to explain the total trade balance between Vietnam and the United States; (ii) unlike the insignificant effect on the aggregated level, the empirical evidence at the disaggregated level is mixed and dependent on product category. Our findings reveal that (iii) the claim of unfair trade by using exchange rate from the US Treasury is unclear from our estimations; and (iv) a depreciation of USD (i.e. appreciation of VND) leads the long-run US’s trade balance will improve for 10 commodities, and whereas an appreciation of USD (depreciation of VND), long-run trade balance will improve for 11 commodities. The results suggest that only a number of specific industries will benefit from USD appreciation or depreciation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Asymmetry and Symmetry of real exchange rate effect on the bilateral trade balance between Vietnam and the United States: aggregated and disaggregated levels of investigation |
English Title: | Asymmetry and Symmetry of real exchange rate effect on the bilateral trade balance between Vietnam and the United States: aggregated and disaggregated levels of investigation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | asymmetry exchange rate; trade balance; ARDL; NARDL |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F40 - General |
Item ID: | 98416 |
Depositing User: | Dr Sy-Hoa Ho |
Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2020 11:10 |
Last Modified: | 01 Feb 2020 11:10 |
References: | Alcala, F. and A. Ciccone (2004), Trade and Productivity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 2, 613–46. Bahmani-Oskoee, M. (1985), Devaluation and the J-Curve: Some Evidence from LDCs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 500-504. Banerjee, A., J. Dolado, and R. Mestre (1998), Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19 (3), 267-283. Bahmani‐Oskooee, M. , Harvey, H. and Hegerty, S. W. (2018), The real peso–dollar rate and US–Mexico industry trade: an asymmetric analysis. Scottish Journal Political Economy, 65: 350-389 Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Muhammad A. (2018). Asymmetric effects of exchange rate changes on the Malaysia-China commodity trade, Economic Systems, 42(3), 470-486. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Wang, Y., 2007. United States–China trade at the commodity level and the Yuan–dollar exchange rate. Contemporary Economic Policy 25 (3), 341–361. Chiu, Y.-B., C.-C., Lee and C.-H., Sun, 2010. The U.S. trade imbalance and real exchange rate: An application of the heterogeneous panel cointegration method, Economic Modelling, 27(3), 705-716. Dang, T. X. T. (2018). Exchange rate and trade balance in Vietnam: A time series analysis. Asian Economic and Financial Review 8 (9), 1158-1174. Edwards, S. (1993), Openness, Trade Liberalization, and Growth in Developing Countries, Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 3, 1358–93. Edwards, S. (1998), Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?, Economic Journal, 108, 447, 383–98. Frankel, J. A. and D. Romer (1996), Trade and Growth: An Empirical Investigation, Working Paper No. 5476, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Frankel, J. A. and D. Romer (1999), Does Trade Cause Growth?, American Economic Review, 89, 3, 379–99. Hoang, L. H. (2016). The role of exchange rate in supporting trade balance in Vietnam. IHEID Working Papers 16-2016, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies. Hoang, V. K. (2013). The effects of the real exchange rate on the trade balance: Is there a j curve for Vietnam? a VAR approach. Asian Journal of Empirical Research 3 (8), 1020-1034. IMF (2018), Vietnam article IV consultation – Press release and staff report, IMF country report No. 18/215. Lee, J.-W., W.J., Mckibbin, and Y.C., Park 2006. Transpacific trade imbalances: causes and cures. World Economy 29 (3), 281–303. Lerner, A (1944). The economics of control, New York: Macmillan. Lopez, R. A. (2005), Trade and Growth: Reconciling the Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Evidence, Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 4, 623–48. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for china: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics 37 (17), 1979-1990. Narayan, P.K., 2006. Examining the relationship between trade balance and exchange rate: the case of China's trade with the USA. Applied Economics Letters 13 (8), 507–510. Nguyen, T. T. V. and T. T. D. Trinh (2019). The impact of exchange rate volatility on exports in Vietnam: A bounds testing approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12 (1), 1-14. Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin, and R. J. Smith (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16 (3), 289-326. Pham, T. T. T. (2014). The impact of exchange rate fluctuation on trade balance in the short and long run: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies 31 (3), 432-452. Pham A. T., T.H. Tran and M.H. Nguyen (2019). The impact of exchange rates on Vietnam-Chinabilateral trade. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 24, 1, 70-96, 2019. Phan, T. H. and J. Y. Jeong (2015). Vietnam trade balance and exchange rate: Evidence from panel data analysis. Journal of Applied Economics & Business Research 5 (4), 220-232. Rose, A. and J. Yellen (1989). Is there a j-curve? Journal of Monetary Economics 24 (1), 53-68. Schorderet, Y. (2003). Asymmetric cointegration. Research papers by the department of economics, University of Geneve. Shin, Y., B. Yu, and M. Greenwood-Nimmo (2014). Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework.Springer Science & Business Media. Singh, T. (2010). Does International Trade Cause Economic Growth? A Survey, The World Economy, 33(11), 1517-1564. Thorbecke, W. (2018). The exposure of U.S. manufacturing industries to exchange rates, International Review of Economics & Finance, 58(C), 38-549. Tran, T. A.-D. and T. T. B. Dinh (2014). FDI inflows and trade imbalances: evidence from developing Asia. European Journal of Comparative Economics 11 (1), 147-169. Tran, T. H. (2019). Impacts of exchange rate on Vietnam-Japan trade balance: A nonlinear asymmetric cointegration approach. MPRA Paper 93286, University Library of Munich, Germany. Wacziarg, R. (2001), Measuring the Dynamic Gains from Trade, World Bank Economic Review, 15, 3, 393–429. Wagner, J. (2007), Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-level Data, The World Economy, 30, 1, 60–82. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98416 |