Social Market Economy as an Alternative to the Washington Consensus in the Western Balkans

Matoshi, Ruzhdi and Mulaj, Isa (2019): Social Market Economy as an Alternative to the Washington Consensus in the Western Balkans. Published in: Economic Vision , Vol. 6, No. 11-12 (December 2019): pp. 180-191.

Abstract

Nearly three decades after the beginning of transition from communism to democracy and open market economy in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), the Washington Consensus in general received the mark as a failure. While the experience from the CEE apart from common results showed considerable variations, the package of reforms is questioned even in the long-term perspective, especially for producing high social costs. Recent mass emigrations from the Western Balkans due to poor economic conditions and from the Middle East, have brought to attention the credibility of exporting or imposing the American type of democracy, and with it, the Washington Consensus as a model of economic transformation and development. But is there an alternative? It already existed even before the systemic changes in CEE began, and can be more preferable even now to the countries that have to undergo a considerable economic transformation. That is the social market economy, which still can be applied in some countries that have lagged behind in transition. This paper explores the perspective of introducing and implementing such a model in the Western Balkan countries, with a reference to the role by the state, taxes, income distribution, and business development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Washington Consensus, Social Market Economy, Western Balkans, economic reforms
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy; P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P51 - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

References

Aslund, Anders (2000), “The Myth of Output Collapse after Communism”, Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Esderts, Hans, J. (2003), Easy Guide to Social Market Economy, Bahasa: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

Fisher, Stanley and Sahay, Ratna (2000), “The Transition Economies after Ten Years”, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 7664.

Frye, Timothy, and Shleifer, Andrei (1997), “The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 87, pp. 354-358.

Guriev, Sergei and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina (2009), “(Un)Happiness in transition”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 143–168.

Havrylyshyn, Oleh (2007), “Fifteen Years of Transformation in Post-Communist World: Rapid Reformers Outperformed Gradualists”, CATO Institute, Discussion Paper No. 4.

International Monetary Fund (1997), “World Economy in Transition: Experience under the IMF’s Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility”, Washington D.C.:, IMF Policy Development and Department of Review.

Rolf, H., Hermann, Schnedier and Weigelt, Klaus eds, (2008), Social Market Economy, Principles and Implementation – From A to Z, Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.

Seliger, Bernhard and M. Wrobel, Ralph (2007), “Die Krise der Ordnungspolitik als Kommunikationskrise”, (The Crisis of Economic Order Policy as a Crisis of Communication), Discussion Paper No. 1, First Dialogue on Social Market Economy: The Social Market Economy Concept and its Implications, Zwickau, 29-30 November 2007.

Stiglitz, Joseph (2002), Globalization and Its Discontents, London: Penguin Books.

Sukiassyan, Grigor (2007), “Inequality and Growth: what Does the Transition Economy Data Say?”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 35-56.

Williamson, John (1990), “What Washington Means by Policy Reform?”, in Williamson, John ed., Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened?, Washington DC.: Institute for International Economics.

World Bank, Gini Index, available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI/, accessed on January 2019.