Sen, Sugata and Sengupta, Soumya (2020): Misleading Estimation of Backwardness through NITI Aayog SDG index: A study to find loopholes and construction of alternative index with the help of Artificial Intelligence.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98534.pdf Download (302kB) | Preview |
Abstract
UNDP Rio +20 summit in 2012 evolved a set of indicators to realise the targets of SDGs within a deadline. Measurement of the performances under these goals has followed the methodology as developed by UNDP which is nothing but the simple average of performances of the indicators under different domains. This work concludes that this methodology to measure the goal-wise as well as the composite performances is suffering from major shortcomings and proposes an alternative using the ideas of artificial intelligence. Here it is accepted that the indicators under different goals are inter-related and hence constructing index through simple average is misleading. Moreover the methodologies under the existing indices have failed to assign weights to different indicators. This work is based on secondary data and the goal-wise indices have been determined through normalised sigmoid functions. These goal-wise indices are plotted on a radar and the area of the radar is treated as measure under composite SDG performance. The whole work is presented through an artificial neural network. Observed that the goal-wise index as developed and tested here has shown that the UNDP as well as NITI Aayog index has delivered exaggerated values of goal-wise as well as composite performances.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Misleading Estimation of Backwardness through NITI Aayog SDG index: A study to find loopholes and construction of alternative index with the help of Artificial Intelligence |
English Title: | Misleading Estimation of Backwardness through NITI Aayog SDG index: A study to find loopholes and construction of alternative index with the help of Artificial Intelligence |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | SDG Index, Sigmoidal Activation Function, Artificial Neural Network |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration |
Item ID: | 98534 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Sugata Sen |
Date Deposited: | 11 Feb 2020 08:16 |
Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2020 08:16 |
References: | Academy, E. D. (2019). 2019 Arab Region SDG Index and Dashboards Report . Sustainable Development Solution Newwork. Africa, T. S. (2018). Africa SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2018. Sustainable Development Solution Network. Atkinson, G., Dietz, S., & Agarwala, M. (2014). Handbook of sustainable development. Edward Elgar. Beyond2015. (2015). 1Sustainable Development Goals and the relationship to a post 2015 global development framework. United nations. Claudé, M., & Combe, D. (2018). THE ROLES OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANS IN DECISION MAKING: TOWARDS AUGMENTED HUMANS? Umea: Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistic. Grebmer, K. v., Bernstein, J., Patterson, F., Wiemers, M., Chéilleachair, R. N., Foley, C., et al. (2019). GLOBAL HUNGER INDEX: THE CHALLENGE OF HUNGER AND CLIMATE CHANGE. Dublin: Helvetas. Griggs, D., Nilsson, M., Stevance, A., & McCollum, D. (2017). A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU). ICSU. (2019, March 13). International Science Council. Retrieved December 20, 2019, from A Guide to SDG Interactions: From Science to interactions: https://council.science/publications/a-guide-to-sdg-interactions-from-science-to-implementation/ Izario, D., Izario, B., Castro, D., & Iano, Y. (2017). Face recognition techniques using artificial intelligence for audio-visual animations. Set International Journal of Boardcasting Engineering, 78-83. Miller, T. (2018, Auguet 16). Explanation in Artificial Intelligence:Insights from the Social Sciences. 1-66. Mukerji, R. (2019). 2019 Global Hunger Index. Climate Justice: A New Narrative for Action . Nabiyev, V. V., Çakiroğlu, Ü., Karal, H., Erümit, A. K., & Çebi, A. (2016). Application of Graph Theory in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Solving Mathematical Word Problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. Neves, P. (2018). LITERATURE REVIEW ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT _ The spirit and critics of SD and SDGs. José LuÍs Cardoso's Lab. Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P., et al. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 1489-1503. Nilsson, N. J. (2005). Human-Level Artificial Intelligence? Be Serious! American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 68-75. Papadimitriou, A. (2016). The future of communication Artificial Intelligence and Social Networks. Media & Communication Studies. Policy, Institute of European Environment. (2019). Europe Sustainable Development Report 2019. Paris: EU . Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth’s Future . Ramesh, A., Kambhampati, C., Monson, J., & Drew, P. (2004, October). Artificial intelligence in medicine. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 334-338. Schnell, R. (1991). Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation and theory construction in the social science. United Nations. (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. New York: United Nations. United Nations. (2018, January 25). Expert Group Meeting on Advancing the 2030 Agenda: Interlinkages and Common Themes at the HLPF 2018. Retrieved February 03, 2020, from Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=13&nr=2592&menu=1634 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98534 |