Bachev, Hrabrin (2002): Организация на снабдяването с материални активи в българските ферми. Published in: Икономика и управление на селското стопанство , Vol. IAXXXX, No. 2 (2002): pp. 17-24.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_99405.pdf Download (13MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This is the third paper from a series of articles on governing of different types of transactions in Bulgarian farming applying the framework of New Institutional and Transaction Cost Economics. It is based on a large scale microeconomic data from 194 typical commercial farms of different sizes (small, middle-size, big) and types (individual, family and group farms; cooperatives, agrofirms) from all regions of the country. This study concentrate on factors and modes for organization of inputs supply in Bulgarian farms. Different governing forms (internal production, own cooperative, member-organization, market contragent) for major types of current (chemicals, seeds, forage) and long term (buildings, machinery, livestock) inputs supply in farms of different types and sizes has been determined. Microeconomic factors responsible for various organizational and contract choices for input supply (buying, leasing, internal procurment) have been specified. Dominant governing modes have been explained by comparative advantages for saving on transacting costs (for finding partners and needed material assets, contracting, contract enforcement and disputing, renewal of contracts etc). Extension (optimization) of farm size through some mode of input supply is undertaken only if it is less expensive comparing to other forms for farm enlargement (e.g. land supply, labor supply, service supply, vertical integration etc). Transaction costs economizing framework has been used through analysis of: frequency of transactions between same partners (always the same partner, usually same partner, different suppliers, every time and season a different partner); reasons for choosing the supplier (the best prices, postponed payments, good reputation of supplier, providing supply on farm, lack of other suppliers, high quality, tradition, high confidence in the supplier, additional benefits); price type (based on market price, negotiated every time, fixed for a long period); interlinked relations (supplier buy farm output, suppliers assist marketing of farm output, no such relationships); problems in input supply (in finding of requested materials, equipment etc; in finding out of a supplier; in quality control; in price negotiations; in contracting other supply terms; in meeting contract terms in execution stage; in conflict resolution).
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Организация на снабдяването с материални активи в българските ферми |
English Title: | Governing of inputs supply of Bulgarian farms |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Keywords: | governance. agriculture, inputs supply, Bulgaria |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing ; Cooperatives ; Agribusiness Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q14 - Agricultural Finance Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy |
Item ID: | 99405 |
Depositing User: | Hrabrin Bachev |
Date Deposited: | 05 Apr 2020 07:27 |
Last Modified: | 05 Apr 2020 07:27 |
References: | Башев Х. (1996): Икономически измерения на аграрните транзакции, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, No 7, 1-14. Башев Х. (1996): Ефективни граници на аграрните организации, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, No 8, 1-16. Башев Х. (1998): Организация на аграрните иновации, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, No 5, 16-25. Башев Х. (2000): Икономика на Аграрните Институции, сп. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 3. Башев Х. (2000): Ефективни форми за управление на аграрните транзакции, сп. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 4. Башев Х. (2000): Икономически граници на фермата, сп. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 5. Башев Х. и Д. Терзиев (2001): Организация на снабдяването със земя в българските ферми, сп. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 5. Башев Х. и Д. Терзиев (2002): Организация на снабдяването с работна сила в българските ферми, сп. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 1. Башев Х. и Д. Терзиев (2002): Организация на снабдяването с материални активи в българските ферми, сп. Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 2. Башев Х. и Д.Терзиев (2002): Организация на снабдяването с услуги в българските ферми, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 3, 20-28. Башев Х. (2003): Организация на реализацията на продукцията в българските ферми, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 6, 13-23. Башев Х. (2003): Организация на снабдяването с финанси в българските ферми, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 5, 10-21. Башев Х. (2003): Ефективност на аграрните организации с отчитане на транзакционните разходи, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство No 2, 13-20. Терзиев Д. и Х. Башев (2003): Взаимно-свързаните транзакции – един различен поглед към проблема за аграрното финансиране, САИБ, София, стр. 42-48. Barry, P. Sonka T. and K.Lajili (1992): Vertical Coordination, Financial Structure, and the Changing Theory of the Firm. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, No 5 Bachev H. (1995): Political and Economical Transition in Bulgaria - Implications for Agriculture, Journal Agriculture in Former USSR and East Europe Vol., No 3, Tokyo, 39-48. Bachev H. (1996): Organization of Agrarian Transactions in Transitional Economies, Proceedings of the 8th European Association of Agricultural Economists Congress “Redefining the Roles for European Agriculture”, Edinburgh, 3-5. Bashev H. and R. Denchev (1992): Economic Efficiency of Agricultural Research, In Issues in Agricultural Development, Occasional Paper Series, Volume 6, 29-33, IAAE. Bachev H. (2000): Bulgarian Experience in Transformation of Farm Structures, in Farm Management and Rural Planning No 1, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 181-196. Bachev H. and M.Tsuji (2001): Structures for Organization of Transactions in Bulgarian Agriculture, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture of Kyushu University, No 46 (1), Fukuoka 123-151. Bachev H. and M.Kagatsume (2002): Governing of Financial Supply in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, No 8, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 131-150. Bachev H. (2002): Study on Land Supply in Bulgarian Farms, in Farm Management and Rural Planning No 3, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 189-203. Bachev H. and M.Kagatsume (2003): Governing of Output Realization in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, No 9, Kyoto University, Kyoto 55-69. Bachev H. (2003): Study on Labor Supply in Bulgarian Farms, in Farm Management and Rural Planning No 4, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 129-145. Bachev H. and M.Kagatsume (2004): Governing of Land Supply in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, No 10, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 71-94. Hayami, Y. and K.Otsuka (1993): “The Economics of Contract Choice. An Agrarian Perspective”, Carendom Press, Oxford Masten, S. (1991): “Transaction Cost Economics and the Organization of Agricultural Transactions, Ohayo State University, Chicago Sporleder, T. (1992): Managerial Economics of Vertically Co-ordinated Agricultural Firms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, No 5 Williamson Oliver (1985): “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism”, Free Press, New York |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/99405 |