Haraguchi, Junichi and Matsumura, Toshihiro (2020): Profit-enhancing entries in mixed oligopolies.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_99688.pdf Download (376kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Mixed oligopolies are characterized by private and public enterprises. Entry into these markets was restrictive, but has now been relaxed by deregulations; as a result, private firms have entered mixed oligopolies. An increase in the number of private firms increases competition among private firms and reduces the profit of incumbent private firms, given the privatization policy remains unchanged. However, an increase in the number of private firms may in turn affect privatization policy, and thus, indirectly affect private firms' profits. Therefore, the overall effect on private firms' profit is ambiguous. In this study, we thus investigate how the number of private firms affects the profit of each private firm in mixed oligopolies. For this end, we use a linear-quadratic production cost function, which covers two popular model formulations in the mixed oligopoly literature. We show that, if the degree of privatization is exogenous, the profit of each private firm is decreasing in the number of private firms. However, if the degree of privatization is endogenous, the relationship between the number of private firms and profit takes an inverted-U shape under a plausible range of cost parameters. Our results imply that there can exist multiple equilibria in free-entry markets with different degrees of privatization.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Profit-enhancing entries in mixed oligopolies |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | optimal degree of privatization, profit-enhancing entry, multiple long-run stable equilibria |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions ; Privatization ; Contracting Out |
Item ID: | 99688 |
Depositing User: | Junichi Haraguchi |
Date Deposited: | 17 Apr 2020 10:52 |
Last Modified: | 17 Apr 2020 10:52 |
References: | Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., Garzon, M. B. (2005a). Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale. European Journal of Political Economy 21(1), 247--267. Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., Garzon, M. B. (2005b). International trade and strategic privatization. Review of Development Economics 9(4), 502--513. Cato, S., Matsumura, T. (2012). Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 168(3):444--454. Cato, S., Matsumura, T. (2013). Long-run effects of tax policies in a mixed market. FinanzArchiv 69(2), 215--240. Chang, W. W. (2005). Optimal trade and privatization policies in an international duopoly with cost asymmetry. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 14, 19--42. Chang, W. W. (2007). Optimal trade, industrial, and privatization policies in a mixed duopoly with strategic managerial incentives. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 16(1), 31--52. Chang, W. W., Ryu H. E. (2015). Vertically related markets, foreign competition and optimal privatization policy. Review of International Economics 23(2), 303--319. Chen, T. L. (2017). Privatization and efficiency: a mixed oligopoly approach. Journal of Economics 120(3), 251--268. Chen, Y., Riordan, M. H. (2007). Price and variety in the spokes model. Economic Journal 117(7), 897--921. Cho, S., Lee, S.-H., Hoang, X. T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and strategic trade policy: An endogenous timing game and its policy implications. Australian Economic Papers, 58(4), 480--497. Coughlan, A. T., Soberman, D. A. (2005). Strategic segmentation using outlet malls. International Journal of Research in Marketing 22(1), 61--86. Corneo, G., Jeanne, O. (1994). Oligopole mixte dans un marche commun. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 33, 73--90. De Fraja, G., Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers 41, 302--311. Escrihuela-Villar, M., Gutierrez-Hita, C. (2019). On competition and welfare enhancing policies in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 126(3), 259--274. Fjell, K., Pal, D. (1996). A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of Economics 29(3), 737--743. Fridman, A (2018). Partial privatization in an exhaustible resource industry. Journal of Economics 124(2), 159--173. Gupta, N. (2005). Partial privatization and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 60(2), 987--1015 Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020a). Lack of commitment to future privatization policies may lead to worst welfare outcome. forthcoming in Economic Modelling. Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020b). Implicit protectionism via state enterprises and technology transfer from foreign enterprises. forthcoming in Review of International Economics. Haraguchi, J., Matsumura, T. (2020c). Asymmetry among private firms and optimal privatization policy. forthcoming in Bulletin of Economic Research. Ishibashi, I., Matsushima, N., 2009, The existence of low-end firms may help high-end firms. Marketing Science 28(1), 136--147. Ishida, J., Matsumura, T., Matsushima N., 2011, Market competition, R&D and firm profits in asymmetric oligopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics 59(3), 484--505. Kawasaki, A., Okawa, T., Okamura, M. (2020). Endogenous timing game in a mixed duopoly with partial foreign ownership and asymmetric increasing marginal costs. forthcoming in Australian Economic Papers. Kim, S.-L., Sang-Ho Lee, S.-H., Matsumura, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics 128(1), 67--89. Kowalski, P., Buge, M., Sztajerowska, M., Egeland, M. (2013). State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications. OECD Trade Policy Papers. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. Journal of Finance 57(1), 265--301. Lahiri, S., Ono, Y. (1988). Helping minor firms reduces welfare. Economic Journal 98, 1199--1202. Lee, S.-H., Matsumura, T., Sato, S. (2018). An analysis of entry-then-privatization model: welfare and policy implications. Journal of Economics 123(1), 71--88. Lee, S.-H., Xu, L. (2018). Endogenous timing in private and mixed duopolies with emission taxes. Journal of Economics 124, 175--201. Lin, Ming Hsin and Toshihiro Matsumura (2012) Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. Journal of Economics 107(1), 71--80. Mahanta, A. (2019). Endogenous strategic variable in a mixed duopoly. Journal of Economics 128(1), 47--65. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70(3), 473--483. Matsumura, T., Kanda, O. (2005). Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics 84(1), 27--48. Matsumura, T., Okamura, M. (2015). Competition and privatization policies revisited: The payoff interdependence approach. Journal of Economics 116(2), 137--150. Matsumura, T. and Shimizu, D. (2010). Privatization waves. Manchester School 78(6), 609--625. Matsumura, T., Sunada, T. (2013). Advertising competition in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 119(2), 183--185. Matsumura, T., Yamagishi, A. (2017a). Long-run welfare effect of energy conservation regulation. Economics Letters 154, 64--68. Matsumura, T., Yamagishi, A. (2017b). Lobbying for regulation reform by industry leaders. Journal of Regulatory Economics 52(1), 63--76. Megginson, W., Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature 39(2):321--389. Mukherjee, A., Zhao, L. (2009). Profit raising entry. Journal of Industrial Economics 57(4), 870--870. Mujumdar, S., Pal, D. (1998). Effects of indirect taxation in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 58(2), 199--204. Ogura, Y. (2018). The objective function of government-controlled banks in a financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance 89, 78--93. Pal, D. (1998). Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters 61(2), 181--185. Pal, D., White, M. D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal 65(2), 264--281. Sato, S., Matsumura, T. (2019). Shadow cost of public funds and privatization policies. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 50, 101026. Seim, K., Waldfogel, J. (2013). Public monopoly and economic efficiency: Evidence from the Pennsylvania liquor control board's entry decisions. American Economic Review 103(2), 831--862. Wang, L. F. S., Chen, T. L. (2011). Mixed oligopoly, optimal privatization and foreign penetration. Economic Modelling 28(4), 1465--1470. Wang, L. F. S., Mukherjee, A. (2012). Undesirable competition. Economics Letters 114, 175--177. Xu, L., Lee, S.-H, Matsumura, T. (2017). Ex-ante versus ex-post privatization policies with foreign penetration in free-entry mixed markets. International Review of Economics & Finance 50, 1--7. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/99688 |