Shamiri, Ahmed and Shaari, Abu Hassan and Isa, Zaidi (2008): Comparing the accuracy of density forecasts from competing GARCH models.
Download (137Kb) | Preview
In this paper we introduce an analyzing procedure using the Kullback-Leibler information criteria (KLIC) as a statistical tool to evaluate and compare the predictive abilities of possibly misspecified density forecast models. The main advantage of this statistical tool is that we use the censored likelihood functions to compute the tail minimum of the KLIC, to compare the performance of a density forecast models in the tails. Use of KLIC is practically attractive as well as convenient, given its equivalent of the widely used LR test. We include an illustrative simulation to compare a set of distributions, including symmetric and asymmetric distribution, and a family of GARCH volatility models. Our results on simulated data show that the choice of the conditional distribution appears to be a more dominant factor in determining the adequacy and accuracy (quality) of density forecasts than the choice of volatility model.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Comparing the accuracy of density forecasts from competing GARCH models|
|Keywords:||Density, conditional distribution, forecast accuracy, GARCH, KLIC|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D53 - Financial Markets
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E37 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
|Depositing User:||Ali Shamiri|
|Date Deposited:||27. Feb 2009 19:04|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 16:43|
BAO, Y., T. H. LEE and B. SALTOGLU (2006): Comparing Density Forecast Models. Journal of Forecasting 26(3), 203-225.
BERKOWITZ, J. (2001): Testing density forecasts, with applications to risk management. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 19(4), 465-474.
BOLLERSLEV, T. (1986): Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31(3), 307–327.
BOLLERSLEV, T. and J. WOOLDRIDGE (1992): Quasi maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time varying covariances Econometric Reviews 5.
CLEMENTS, M. P. and J. SMITH (2000): Evaluating the forecast densities of linear and non-linear models: applications to output growth and unemployment. Journal of Forecasting 19(4), 255-276.
CORRADI, V. and N. R. SWANSON (2004): "Predictive Density Evaluation, in the Handbook of Economic Forecasting, G.
Elliott, CWJ Granger and A. Timmermann ed. s," in.: North Holland Press, Amsterdam.
D'AGOSTINO, R. B., M. A. STEPHENS and R. B. D'AGOSTINO (1986): Goodness-Of-Fit-Techniques: Marcel Dekker.
DIEBOLD, F. X., T. A. GUNTHER and A. S. TAY (1998): Evaluating Density Forecasts with Applications to Financial Risk Management. International Economic Review 39(4), 863-883.
DIEBOLD, F. X. and R. S. MARIANO (1995): Comparing Predictive Accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13(3), 253-263.
DIEBOLD, F. X., A. S. TAY and K. WALLIS (1999): "Evaluating Density Forecasts of Ination: the Survey of Professional Forecasts," in.: Festschrift in Honor of CWJ Granger, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76-90.
FERNANDEZ-VILLAVERDE, J. and J. RUBIO-RAMÍREZ (2004): Comparing Dynamic Equilibrium Models to Data: A Bayesian Approach. Journal of Econometrics 123(1), 153–187.
GALLANT, A. R. and D. W. NYCHKA (1987): Semi-Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Econometrica 55(2), 363-390.
GRANGER, C. W. J. and M. H. PESARAN (1996): A Decision-theoretic Approach to Forecast Evaluation: University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics.
HAMILL, T. M. (2000): Interpretation of Rank Histograms for Verifying Ensemble Forecasts. Monthly Weather Review 129(3), 550-560.
HANSEN, P. R. (2001): An unbiased and powerful test for superior predictive ability. Manuscript, Brown University.
KULLBACK, S. and R. A. LEIBLER (1951): On Information and Sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22(1), 79-86.
LI, F. and G. TKACZ (2001): Evaluating Linear and Non-linear Time-varying Forecast-combination Methods: Bank of Canada.
NOCETI, P., J. SMITH and S. HODGES (2003): An evaluation of tests of distributional forecasts. Journal of Forecasting 22(6-7), 447-455.
POON, S. H. and C. W. J. GRANGER (2003): Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review. Journal of Economic Literature 41(2), 478-539.
ROSENBLATT, M. (1952): Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23(3), 470-472.
SARNO, L. and G. VALENTE (2004): Comparing the accuracy of density forecasts from competing models. Journal of Forecasting 23(8), 541-557.
TAY, A. S. and K. F. WALLIS (2000): Density forecasting: a survey. Journal of Forecasting 19(4), 235-254.
VUONG, Q. H. (1989): Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2), 307-333.
WEST, K. D. (1996): Asymptotic Inference about Predictive Ability. Econometrica 64(5), 1067-1084.
WEST, K. D., H. J. EDISON and D. CHO (1993): A utility-based comparison of some models of exchange rate volatility. Journal of International Economics 35(1-2), 23–46.
WHITE, H. (2000): A Reality Check for Data Snooping. Econometrica 68(5), 1097-1126.