Alcantud, José Carlos R. (2010): Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto.
Download (290Kb) | Preview
This paper investigates ethical aggregation of infinite utility streams by representable social welfare relations. We prove that the Hammond Equity postulate and other variations of it like the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle are incompatible with positive responsiveness to welfare improvements by every generation. The case of Hammond Equity for the Future is investigated too.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto|
|Keywords:||Social welfare function; Equity; Inequality aversion; Pareto axiom; Intergenerational justice|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice and Growth > D90 - General
|Depositing User:||Jose Carlos R. Alcantud|
|Date Deposited:||21. Dec 2010 14:21|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 05:06|
Alcantud, J.C.R. and Garcia-Sanz, M.D. (2010): Paretian evaluation of infinite utility streams: an egalitarian criterion. Economics Letters 106, 209-211.
Alcantud, J.C.R. and Garc\'\i a-Sanz, M.D. (2010): Evaluations of infinite utility streams: Pareto-efficient and egalitarian axiomatics. MPRA Paper No. 20133, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20133/
Asheim, G. B., Mitra, T. and Tungodden, B. (2010): Sustainable recursive social welfare functions. Economic Theory, forthcoming.
Asheim, G. B. and Tungodden, B. (2004a): Do Koopmans' postulates lead to discounted utilitarianism?. Discussion paper 32/04, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.
Banerjee, K. (2006): On the equity-efficiency trade off in aggregating infinite utility streams. Economics Letters 93, 63-67.
Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2003): Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: The impossibility of being Paretian. Econometrica 71, 1557-1563.
Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2007): Possibility theorems for equitably aggregating infinite utility streams. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (Eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability: Conference Proceedings of the IWEA Roundtable Meeting on Intergenerational Equity (Palgrave).
Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y. and Suzumura, K. (2007): Ordering infinite utility streams. Journal of Economic Theory 135, 579-589.
Koopmans, T.C. (1960): Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28, 287-309.
Hara, C., Shinotsuka, T., Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2008): Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams. Social Choice and Welfare 31, 179-191.
Sakai, T. (2006): Equitable intergenerational preferences on restricted domains. Social Choice and Welfare 27, 41-54.