Alcantud, José Carlos R. (2010): Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_27618.pdf Download (297kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates ethical aggregation of infinite utility streams by representable social welfare relations. We prove that the Hammond Equity postulate and other variations of it like the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle are incompatible with positive responsiveness to welfare improvements by every generation. The case of Hammond Equity for the Future is investigated too.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Social welfare function; Equity; Inequality aversion; Pareto axiom; Intergenerational justice |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D90 - General |
Item ID: | 27618 |
Depositing User: | Jose Carlos R. Alcantud |
Date Deposited: | 21 Dec 2010 14:21 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 22:01 |
References: | Alcantud, J.C.R. and Garcia-Sanz, M.D. (2010): Paretian evaluation of infinite utility streams: an egalitarian criterion. Economics Letters 106, 209-211. Alcantud, J.C.R. and Garc\'\i a-Sanz, M.D. (2010): Evaluations of infinite utility streams: Pareto-efficient and egalitarian axiomatics. MPRA Paper No. 20133, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20133/ Asheim, G. B., Mitra, T. and Tungodden, B. (2010): Sustainable recursive social welfare functions. Economic Theory, forthcoming. Asheim, G. B. and Tungodden, B. (2004a): Do Koopmans' postulates lead to discounted utilitarianism?. Discussion paper 32/04, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Banerjee, K. (2006): On the equity-efficiency trade off in aggregating infinite utility streams. Economics Letters 93, 63-67. Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2003): Aggregating infinite utility streams with intergenerational equity: The impossibility of being Paretian. Econometrica 71, 1557-1563. Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2007): Possibility theorems for equitably aggregating infinite utility streams. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (Eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability: Conference Proceedings of the IWEA Roundtable Meeting on Intergenerational Equity (Palgrave). Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y. and Suzumura, K. (2007): Ordering infinite utility streams. Journal of Economic Theory 135, 579-589. Koopmans, T.C. (1960): Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28, 287-309. Hara, C., Shinotsuka, T., Suzumura, K. and Xu, Y. (2008): Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams. Social Choice and Welfare 31, 179-191. Sakai, T. (2006): Equitable intergenerational preferences on restricted domains. Social Choice and Welfare 27, 41-54. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/27618 |