Berdellima, Arian and Naqvi, Nadeem (2012): Social diversification, injustices, and Pareto optimality with non-binary preferences.
Download (430Kb) | Preview
We prove the existence of a Pareto optimal state of a finite society that has socially differentiated persons, each with non-binary personal preferences that quasi-order a finite set of alternatives. Everybody engages in a volitional act of choice by maximization of non-binary preferences. As a consequence of interpersonal interaction among social creatures, the social interaction outcome defined as belonging to a nonempty social maximal set exists, and thus is Pareto optimal. Injustices inflicted by one group of persons upon a socially distinct one, arising from social diversification, are, however, consistent with such a collective outcome. (95 words)
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Social diversification, injustices, and Pareto optimality with non-binary preferences|
|Keywords:||non-binary choice; maximization; Pareto optimality; social identity; justice; discrimination|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J15 - Economics of Minorities and Races; Non-labor Discrimination
D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
|Depositing User:||Nadeem Naqvi|
|Date Deposited:||03. Jun 2012 16:08|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 00:11|
Akerlof, George A. and Kranton, Rachael, E., (2000) “Economics and Identity, “ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), 715-753.
_____________, (1998), “What has economics to say about racial discrimination,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12; 91-100.
_____________ and Debreu, Gerard, (1954), “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, 22 (3), 265-290.
Becker, Gary, (1957), The Economics of Discrimination, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Naqvi, Nadeem, (2010), “On Non-binary Personal Preferences in Society, Economic Theory and Racial Discrimination,” MPRA Paper No. 21522, Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21522/.
Sen, Amartya, K., (1970), Collective choice and social welfare, North Holland: Amsterdam; 1970.
_____________, (1989), “Coperation, Inequality, and the Family,” Population and Development Review, 15: 61-76.
_____________, (1992), “Missing women: social inequality outweighs women’s survival advantage in Asia and north Africa,” British Medical Journal, 304 (6827), 587-88.
_____________, (1994), “Non-Binary Choice and Preference,” in Parawitz, Dag, Skyrms, Brian and Westrerstahl, Dag, (Eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, Uppsala, Sweden, August 2-14, 1991, Elsevier: Amsterdam.
____________, (1997), “Maximization and the Act of Choice,” Econometrica, 65: 745-779.
____________, (2006), Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, W.W. Norton: New York.
____________, (2009), The Idea of Justice, Penguin Books: New Delhi.
____________, and Williams, Bernard, (1982), “Introduction,” in Sen and Williams (Eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.