Curricula tracking and central examinations: counterbalancing the Impact of social background on student achievement in 36 countries.

Bol, Thijs and Witschge, Jacqueline and Van de Werfhorst, Herman and Dronkers, Jaap (2013): Curricula tracking and central examinations: counterbalancing the Impact of social background on student achievement in 36 countries.

Abstract

Tracked educational systems are associated with a greater social inequality in children’s educational achievement. Until now research has assumed that the impact of tracking on the inequality of educational opportunity is independent of other educational institutional features. Using data from the 2006 PISA survey, we study how central examinations affect the association between tracking and inequality. We find that parent’s social class has a larger effect on student achievement in systems without central examinations, whereas in systems with central examinations this relationship is attenuated. We argue that central examinations help hold schools accountable for their performance, thereby making it more likely for schools to allocate students to tracks and reward them on the basis of objective indicators, thereby reducing the impact of parental status on children’s performance.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: tracking, stratification, inequality of educational opportunity, PISA
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy

References

Aiken, L.S., and West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Allmendinger, J. (1989). Educational systems and labor market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231-250.

Amrein, A. L., and Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. A research report. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32-38.

Ayalon, H., and Gamoran, A. (2000). Stratification in academic secondary programs and educational inequality in Israel and the United States. Comparative and International Education Society, 44(1), 54-80.

Bishop, J. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on achievement. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 260-264. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity and social inequality. New York: Wiley.

Breen, R., and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials. Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275-305.

Breen, R., and Jonsson, J. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223-243.

Breen, R., and Yaish, M. (2006). Testing the Breen-Goldthorpe model of educational decision making. In S.L. Morgan, D.B. Grusky, and G.S. Fields (Eds.) Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research in sociology and economics (pp. 232-258). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Brunello, G., and Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect inequality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22(52), 781-861.

Chiang, H. (2009). How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9–10), 1045–1057.

Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. National Center for Educational Statistics (DHEW/OE), Washington, DC.

Cross, C. (2004). Putting the pieces together; Lessons from comprehensive school reform research. The National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform (NCCSR).

Dunne, Allison. 2010. Dividing Lines: Examining the Relative Importance of Between and Within- School Differentiation during lower Secondary Education. PhD thesis, European University Institute.

Duru-Bellat, M., and Kieffer, A. (2000). Inequalities in educational opportunities in France: Educational expansion, democratization or shifting barriers? Journal of Education Policy, 15(3), 333-352.

Entorf, H., and Lauk, M. (2006). Peer effects, social multipliers and migrants at school: An international comparison. IZA Discussion Paper 2182.

Erikson, R., and Jonsson, J. (1996). Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective. Boulder: Westview press.

Eurydice. (2004). European Glossary on Education. Volume 1 – Second Edition. Examinations, Qualifications and Titles. Brussels: Eurydice. Figlio, D., and Page, M. (2002). School choice and the distributional effects of ability tracking: does separation increase inequality? Journal of Urban Economics, 51(3), 497-514.

Fuchs, T., and Wössmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination of using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32, 433–464.

Gamoran, A. (1996). Curriculum standardization and equality of opportunity in Scottish secondary education: 1984-90. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 1-21.

Gamoran, A., and Weinstein, M. (1998). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, 106(3), 385-415. Hallinan, M. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.

Hanushek, E. A., and Wössmann, L. (2011). The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Wössmann (Eds.), Handbooks in Economics (Vol. 3, pp. 89–200). The Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier.

Hanushek, E., and Wössmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences- in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(3), C63-C76.

Horn, D. (2009). Age of selection counts: a cross-country analysis of educational institutions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(4), 343-366. Hout, M., and Elliott, S. W. (Eds.). (2011). Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Education. Report of the Committee on Incentives and Test-Based Accountability in Public Education, National Research Council. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.

Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., and Hargrove, T. Y. (2003).The unintended consequences of high stakes testing. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Kerckhoff, A. (2001). Education and social stratification processes in comparative perspective. Sociology of Education, 74(extra issue), 3-18.

LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., and Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 43-89.

Marks, G. (2005). Cross-national differences and accounting for social class inequalities in education. International Sociology, 20(4), 483–505.

Marks, G. (2006). Are between- and within-school differences in student performance largely due to socio-economic background? Evidence from 30 countries. Educational Research, 48(1), 21-40.

Meghir, C., and Palme, M. (2005). Educational Reform, Ability, and Family Background. American Economic Review, 95(1), 414-424.

Minter Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: learning from gender and race variation. NBER Working Paper 7867. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track, how schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

OECD. (2006). Education at a glance. OECD indicators 2006. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OECD. (2007). No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OECD. (2009a). Pisa 2006 Technical report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OECD. (2009b). Pisa 2006 Data Analysis Manual (SPSS). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Pekkarinen, T., Uusitalo, R., and Kerr, S. (2009). School tracking and development of cognitive skills. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4058.

Richer, S. (1976). Reference-group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research. Sociology of Education, 49(1), 65-71.

Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–592. Schütz, G., Ursprung, H., and Wössmann, L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279-308.

Shavit, Y., and Blossfeld, H. (1993). Persistent inequality; changing educational attainment in 13 countries. Boulder, CO: Westview press.

Shavit, Yossi, and Walter Müller. 1998. From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shavit, Y., Arum, R., and Gamoran, A. (2007). Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Van der Meer, T., Te Grotehuis, M., and Pelzer, B. (2010). Influential Cases in Multilevel Modeling. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 173-178.

Van Houtte, M., and Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). Study Involvement of Academic and Vocational Students: Does Between-School Tracking Sharpen the Difference? American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 943–973.

Wilkinson, I., Parr, J., Fung, I., Hattie, J., and Townsend, M. (2002). Discussion: Modelling and maximizing peer effects in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(4), 521-535.

Wössmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117–171.

Wössmann, L., Luedemann, E., Schütz, G., and West, M. (2009). School accountability, autonomy, and choice around the world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Wu, M., and Adams, R. (2002, April). Plausible values: why are they important? Paper presented at the International Objective Measurement Workshop, New Orleans, LA.