Garofalo, M.R. and Marra, M (2007): Work-Life Reconciliation Policies From Well-Being To Development: Rethinking EU Gender Mainstreaming.
Download (309kB) | Preview
Across the European Union (EU), gender policies are cross-cutting initiatives incorporated within the major axes of regional operational programs, and specifically, within active labor-market, local development and inclusion policies. This is the so-called gender mainstreaming across EU Structural Funds, calling for increasing policy instruments integration. The aim of this paper is to understand if and how to improve women’s well-being and subsequently participation in collective action through reconciliation policies. These measures aim to allow women and men to choose how they can reconcile family care, paid work, career advancement, and leisure. The idea is that such a choice implies a time allocation pattern, which is not exclusively determined by market mechanisms and/or policy measures, but also by cultural trajectories, moral values, intrinsic motivations and rules (Folbre, Nelson 2002; North, 2005; Witt 2003), varying across regions and within groups. Furthermore, the outcomes of this choice are not completely internalized as individual well-being but they can also create positive externalities. First, this paper reconstructs reconciliation policies and their governance structures across less-developed regions in Italy (so-called EU Objective 1 areas) within the EU programming phase 2000-2006. Drawing upon this reconstruction, out analysis seeks to account for differences in both contextual conditions and individual characteristics, which, in turn, shape regional development processes. Second, the paper focuses on the design of conciliation policies to unveil what underlying microeconomic premises explain the expected beneficiaries’ behavioural change. Departing from the inadequacy of standard economics, whereby work-life reconciliation would be reduced to a unique choice pattern at the individual level, the paper examines those factors of subjective identities and contextual characteristics that actually affect work-life reconciliation choices, and by this way they can have a development impact (Bowles 1998, Ray, 2000, Sen 1999). In fact, the traditional public choice approach to gender policy may not only perpetuate a male-dominated structure of socioeconomic relations but it may also keep the economy working at a less efficient level. In other words, reconciliation policies may end up reinforcing a path dependent equilibrium of low efficiency, accentuating institutional, economic, social, and cultural traps (Bowles, Durlauf and Hoff 2006). By contrast, our idea is that reconciliation policies can work as development policies as long as they alter current power structures and enhance women capabilities. Building upon this critical review of the existing gender policy framework, we put forward a cognitive framework for work-life reconciliation as a driving force to development.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Work-Life Reconciliation Policies From Well-Being To Development: Rethinking EU Gender Mainstreaming|
|Keywords:||Microeconomic behaviour; Gender Mainstreaming; Intrinsic Motivations; Local Development; Conciliation; Power Structures|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination
|Depositing User:||Mita Marra|
|Date Deposited:||19. Jul 2008 07:39|
|Last Modified:||11. May 2015 23:54|
Addis, E. (2002) “Gender symmetry in the Reform of European welfare state,” European University Institute Working Paper, Florence.
Adserà A. and Ray D. (1998), “History and Coordination Failure”, Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 267-276
Agarwal B. (1997),” Bargaining and Gender Relations: within and beyond the Household”, Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1-51
Agarwal B. (2002), Gender Inequality, Cooperation and Environmental Sustainability”, Institute of Economic Growth, Dehli, mimeo
Agarwal B. (2004), “Feminist Economics as a Challenge to MainstreaM economics?”, IAFFE Newsletter, 14 (3)
Aoki M. (2007), “Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes”, Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(1), 1-31
Appadurai A. (2002), The Capacity to Aspire, in Rao V and Walton M eds, Culture and Public Action, The World Bank, Washington, 59-84
Azariadis C. (2006), The Theory of Poverty Traps. What Have We Lernead?, in Bowles S., Durlauf S.N., Hoff K. eds, Poverty Traps, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 17-40
Azariadis C. and Drazen A. (1990), “Threshold Externalities and Development Economics”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 501-526
Ballet J., Dubois J-L. and Mahieu F-R (2007),” Responsability foe Each Other’s Freedom : Agency as the Source of Collective Capability”, Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 185-201
Banerjee A. and Duflo E. (2005), Growth Theory Through the Lens of Development Economics, in Durlauf S.N. and Aghion P., Handbook of Growth Economics, Vol. 1A, Nort Holland, Amsterdam
Barker D. (2003), “Emancipatory for Whom? A Comment on Critical Realism”, Feminist Economics, 9(1), 103-108
Barker D. (2005), “ Beyond Women and Economics: Rereading “Women’s Work”, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30 (4), 2190-2209
Bettio F., Del Bono E. and Smith M. (1998) "Working Time Patterns in the European Union: Policies and Innovations" Commission for the European Communities. [CE-V/2-98-010-EN-C].
Boserup E. (1970), Women’s Role in Economic Development, Allen and Union, London.
Bowles S. (1998),” Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions”, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVI, 75-111.
Bowles S. (2006), Institutional Poverty Traps, in Bowles S.et al., 116-138.
Bowles S., Durlauf S. N. and Hoff K. eds (2006), Poverty Traps, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Burgess R. and Venables A. J. (2004) Toward a Microeconomics of Growth, Working Paper No. 3257, World Bank Policy Research, Washington.
Carbone J and Cahn N. (2005), “ Behavioral biology, the Rational Actor Man, and New Feminist Agenda”, George Washington University, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, no 276.
Caroleo F.E. and Garofalo M.R. (2006), “Il modello sociale europeo: quale opportunità di occupazione per il terzo settore?”, Impresa Sociale, 1, 27-56.
Ciccone A. and Matsuyama K. (1996),” Start-up Costs and Pecuniary Externalities as Barriers to Economic Development”, Journal of Development Economics, 49, 33-59.
Ciscel, D.H., Heath, J.A. (2001) “To market, to market: imperial capitalism’s destruction of social capital and the family,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 33, 401-414.
Dixit A. (1996), The Making of Economic Policy. A Transaction Costs Politics, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Dopfer K., Foster J. and Potts J (2004), Micro-Meso- Macro“, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 163-219.
Dreze, J, Sen A. (1995), India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Durlauf S.N. (2006), Groups, Social Influences and Inequality: A Memberships Theory Perspective on Poverty Traps, in Bowles S. et al., 141-175.
Eggertosson T. (1998), Limits to Institutional Reform, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100, 335-357.
Elson, D., Pearson, R. (1981) “The subordination of women and the internationalization of factory production, in K. Young et al. eds. Of marriage and the market: women’s subordination in international perspective, London: CSE Books.
European Commission (1999), “Employment Policies in the European Union and in the State Members”, Bruxelles.
Folbre A. and Nelson J. (2002), For Love and for Money, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 123-140.
Fondazione G. Brodolini (2007) Study on poverty and social exclusion among lone-parents households, Rome.
Garofalo M.R., Marra M. (2007) “Work-life Reconciliation Policies from Well-Being to Development: Rethinking EU Gender Mainstreaming,” paper presented at the 2007 Human Development and Capabilities Approach (HDCA), Sept. 18-20 New York, available at www.ssrn.org.
Gintis H., Bowles S., Boyd R. and Fehr E. eds (2005) Moral Sentiments and Material interests: the Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life, The MIT Press, Cambridge .
Harding S: (1999), “The Case for Strategic Realism: A Response to Lawson”, Feminist Economics, 5(3), 127-133.
Hertz R. (1997) “A typology of approaches to childcare: The centrepiece of organizing family and life for dual-earner couples,” Journal of Family Issues, 18, 355-385.
Hill M. (2007), “Confronting Power through Policy: on the Creation and Spread of Liberating Knowledge,” Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 259-282.
Hirschman A. (1958), The Strategy of Economic Development, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Hoff K. (2000), “Beyond Rosenstein Rodan: The Modern Theory of Coordination Problems in Development,” Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, The World Bank, 145-176.
Hoff K., SEN A. (2006), The Kin System As a Poverty Trap, in Bowles S. et al.,95-115.
Isfol (2004) Conciliazione tra vita lavorativa e vita familiare, integrazione delle politiche e problemi di valutazione, Unità Pari Opportunità, Roma.
Istat (2005) Avere un figlio, Rome.
Istat (2005) Essere madri oggi, Rome.
Jackson C. (2001) “Rescuing Gender From the Poverty Trap.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 33, 495–508.
Jha S. (2004), Cultured Economic Theory: Oxymoron or incipient reality?, Standford University, mimeo.
Lawson T. (1999), “Feminism, Realism and Universalism”, Feminist Economics, 5(2), 25-59.
Lawson T. (2003),”Ontology and Feminist Theorizing”, Feminist Economics, 9(1), 119-50.
Litton, Fox, G., Mcbride Murray, V. (2000) “Gender and Families: A Feminist Perspective,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 62, No. 4, 160-1172.
Mansdotter A., Lindblom L., Winkvist A. (2007) “Parental leave in Sweden – Cost savings and health gains, Health Policy, 82, 102-115.
Marks N.F. (1998) “Does it hurt to care? Caregiving, work-family conflict, and midlife well-being,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 951-966.
Marra M. (2004) “Strumenti di emersione e meccanismi di cambiamento” in Stame, N. (2004) Per la valutazione della politica di emersione, Franco Angeli, Milano pp. 77-104.
Matsuyama K. (1996), Economic Development as Coordination Problems, in M. Aoki, H. Kim, M. Okuno Fujwara eds, The Role of Government in East Asian Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 134-159.
Meier G., Stiglitz J. E. (Eds.) (2004), Frontiers of Development Economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Meldolesi L. (2003) “La politica dell’emersione dell’economia e del lavoro irregolari”, Economia Italiana, n.1.
Meldolesi L., Marchese M. (2005) Emersione al femminile, Carocci, Roma.
Mikkola A. (2005), “Role of Gender Equality in Development. A Review Literature”, Dpt. Of Economics, University of Helsinki, mimeo.
Mutari E. (2001) “...As broad as our life experience”: visions of feminist political economy, 1972–1991,” Review of Radical Political Economics, 33, 379–399.
Nelson J. (2003), “Once More, with Feeling: Feminist Economics and the Ontological Questions”, Feminist Economics, 9(1), 109-118.
Nelson J. (2004), “Freedom, Reason, and More: Feminist Economics and Human Development”, Journal of Human Development, 5 (3), 309-333.
North D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
North D.C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Orloff A. (1996) Gender and the welfare state, Discussion Paper, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, US.
Pawson R., Tilley N. (1997), Realist Evaluation, London: Sage Publications.
Pawson R. (2001) Evidence Based Policy: II. The Promise of ‘Realist Synthesis, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Working Paper 4, University of London, London.
Peter F. (2003), “ Critical Realism, Feminist Episemology , and the Emancipatory Potential of Science: a Comment on Lawson and Harding”, Feminist Economics, 9(1), 93-101.
Ranis G., Boozer M, Stewart F. and Suri T. (2003), Paths to Success: The Realationship between Human Development and Economic Growth, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Disc. Pap. No.874.
Ranis G:, Stewart F, Samman E. (2005), Human Development:Beyond HDI, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Disc. Pap. No. 916.
Ray D. (1998), Development Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Ray D. (2002), Aspirations, Poverty and Economic Change, New York and Institute de Analisis Economica (CSIC), mimeo.
Ray D. (2000), “What’s New in Development Economics?”, The American Economist, 44,3-16.
Robeyns I. (2000), Is there a Feminist Methodology?, Wolfson College, Cambridge UK, mimeo.
Robeyns I. (2003), “Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities”, Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3), 61-92.
Rubery J., Fagan C., Grishaw D., Figueiredo H. and Smith M. (2002), Indicators of Gender Equality in the European Employment Strategy, European Work and Emplyment Research Centre, Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Techonology.
Sartori D. (2005), …Et Dona Ferentes. La Dichiarazione dei Diritti del 1789, un Dono Doppio, in Giacomin B. and Che motti S. eds, Donne in Filosofia, Il Poligrafo, Padova, 89-107.
Schmid G. and Schonmann K (1995), “ Institutional Choice and Flexible Coordination. A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Labour Market Policy in Europe”, in Schimd G. et al. eds, Labour Market Institutions in Europe, London, M. E. Sharpe.
Sen A. (1999), Development as Freedom, Albert A. Knopf, New York.
Sen A. (2003),”Continuing the Conversation”,Feminist Economics, 9 (2/3), 319-332.
Simonazzi A. ed., (2006), Questioni di Genere, Questioni di Politica, Ed. Carocci, Roma.
Villa P. (2006), Famiglia, Impresa e Società: gli Effetti delle Politiche di Conciliazione, in Simonazzi A. ed., Roma, 63-89.
Witt U. (2003), “Economic Policy Making in Evolutionary Perspective”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 77-94.