About SES & educational expectations: interrelations in the determination of higher education baccalaureate attainment.

Milagros, Nores (2007): About SES & educational expectations: interrelations in the determination of higher education baccalaureate attainment.

Abstract

Community colleges and four-year colleges provide two differing alternatives to post secondary education. High school seniors face several options upon high school completion: entering the labor market, entering a community college (for a two-year degree or as a step towards a baccalaureate) or attending a four-year institution. Selection into each of these is clearly not a random process, but one related to previous educational experiences, family characteristics and social class, and educational expectations, among others. Attempting to address this issue of self selection, Rouse (1994 & 1995) explicitly posed the question of the democratization versus diversion effects of community colleges. Her work provides evidence of a rational behavior on the part of two-year college students who respond to price and proximity of such institutions (1994), and of the existence of primarily a democratization effect (1994 & 1995).

This paper proposes a variation on the work by Rouse (1995) and Leigh and Gill (2003) by inquiring into the effect of SES in relation to students’ educational expectations. It builds on these two models. The underlying hypothesis is that expectations are not independent from SES and therefore examining social class differences and their interaction with educational expectations would support the theory of endogeneity between educational expectations and socioeconomic background. We directly control for expectations and interactions between SES and expectations, as well as considering variations to modeling SES and use alternative estimation methods for bounded probabilities (Logit and Biprobit) and compare these to their approaches.

W find the effect of expectations on the probability for middle and middle-high class students’ proved steeper than for the everyone but low SES students. Effect on expected probabilities increasing with SES. These results disappear when estimation methods are improved, using logits and bivariate probit methods, instead of OLS and IVs (explicitly modeling expectations). However, the democratization effect remains significant through all estimations, and strengthens when estimation methods are improved. Out estimates therefore reinforced the findings by Rouse (1995) and Leigh and Gill (2003) of a positive democratization effect that outweighs any diversion effects.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: higher education; instrumental variables; bivariate probit; expectations; democratization effect; post secondary educational attainment
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O51 - U.S. ; Canada; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy

References

Brint, S. & J. Karabel (1989) Community Colleges and the American Social Order. In, Arum, R and I.R.Beattie (eds) (1999) The Structure of Schooling. Readings in the Sociology of Education McGraw Hill Higher Education, New York: pp. 463-473.

Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G.J. R. and Britto’s (1999) Are Socioeconomic Gradients for Children Similar to Those for Adults? Achievement and Health for Children in the United States. In D.P.Keating and C. Herzman (Eds.) Developmental Health and the Wealth of Nations: Social, Biological, and Educational Dynamics. New York: Guilford Press: pp. 94-124.

Dougherty, K. (1987) The Effects of Community Colleges: Aid or Hindrance to Socioeconomic Attainment? Sociology of Education, 60 (April): pp. 86-103.

Dougherty, K. (1992). Community Colleges and Baccalaureate Attainment. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2): pp.188-213.

Dougherty, K. (1994) The Community College’s Impact on Students, the Economy, and the Universities. In The Contradictory College: The Conflicting Origins, Impacts, and Futures of the Community ollege. Albany: SUNY Press: pp.42-68.

Grubb, W. N. (2002a) Learning and Earning in the Middle, Part I: National Studies of Pre-Baccalaureate Education. Economics of Education Review, 21: pp. 299-321.

Grubb, W. N. (2002b) Learning and Earning in the Middle, Part II: National Studies of Pre-Baccalaureate Education. Economics of Education Review, 21: pp. 401-414.

Hagy, A.P. & J.F.O. Staniec. (2002) Immigrant Status, Race, and Educational Choice in Higher Education. Economics of Education Review, 21: pp. 381-192.

Kane, T.J. & C.E. Rouse (1995) Labor-Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year College. The American Economic Review, 85 (3): pp. 600-614.

Leigh, D.E. & A.M. Gill (2003) Do Community Colleges Really Divert Students From Earning Bachelor’s Degrees? Economics of Education Review, 22: pp. 23-30.

Monks, J. (2000) The Returns to Individual and College Characteristics. Evidence form the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics of Education Review, 19: pp. 279-289.

Rouse, C.E. (1994) What to Do After High School: the Two-Year vs. Four-Year College Enrollment Decision. Choice & consequences: Contemporary policy issues in education, pp. 59-88. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

Rouse, C.E. (1995) Democratization or Diversion? The Effect of Community Colleges on Educational Attainment. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13 (2): pp. 217-224.

Whitaker, D.G. & E.T. Pascarella (1994) Two-Year College Attendance and Socioeconomic Attainment. Journal of Higher Education, 65(2): pp.194-210.

Willms, J.D. (2001) Standards of Care: Investments to Improve Children’s Educational Outcomes in Latin America. Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy. Quebec: University of New Brunswick.