Borooah, Vani (2019): Caste Gender and Occupational Outcomes. Published in: Disparity and Discrimination in Labour Markets in India No. Palgrave Macmillan (July 2019): pp. 97-132.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_101823.pdf Download (584kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This chapter discusses an important concern of public policy in India which is to ensure that all persons, regardless of gender, caste, or religion, are treated fairly in the jobs market. A key aspect of this relates to inter-group differences in the likelihood of attaining different levels of occupational success. The issue here is whether these differences in likelihood are justified by differences in the distribution of employee attributes or whether they are, wholly or in part, due to employer bias. This chapter attempts to answer these questions using unit record data from the Indian Human Development Survey relating to the period 2011–12. Of particular interest to this chapter is that the Survey provides details about the occupations of approximately 62,500 persons by placing them in one or more of 99 occupations; these are aggregated in chapter 4 into six broad occupational categories. Using these data, the chapter (focusing on men and women between the ages of 21 and 60) employs the methods of multinomial logit to estimate the probabilities of persons being in these occupational categories, after controlling for their gender/caste/religion and their employment-related attributes. The main focus is the issue of differences between men and women, and differences between persons belonging to different social groups, in their likelihood of being in the different employment categories. Data on these men and women were used to decompose the observed difference between the groups, in their average proportions in the different occupations, into an “employer bias” and an “employee attributes” effect.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Caste Gender and Occupational Outcomes |
English Title: | Caste Gender and Occupational Outcomes |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Caste, Discrimination, Occupation, India |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J38 - Public Policy J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination |
Item ID: | 101823 |
Depositing User: | Vani / K Borooah |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jul 2020 01:52 |
Last Modified: | 19 Jul 2020 01:52 |
References: | Bhambri, C.P. (2005), “Reservations and Casteism”, Economic and Political Weekly, 40: 806–808. Borooah, V.K. (2001a), “How do Employees of Ethnic Origin Fare on the Occupational Ladder in Britain?”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48: 1–26. Borooah, V.K. (2001b), “The Measurement of Employment Inequality between Population Subgroups: Theory and Application”, Labour, 15: 169–189. Borooah, V.K., Dubey, A. and Iyer, S. (2007), “The Effectiveness of Jobs Reservation: Caste, Religion, and Economic Status in India”, Development & Change, 38: 423–455. Bourguignon, F. (1979), “Decomposable Income Inequality Measures”, Econometrica, 47: 901–920. Cowell, F. and Jenkins, S. (1995), “How Much Inequality Can We Explain? A Methodology and an Application to the United States”, Economic Journal, 105: 421–430. Desai, S., Dubey, A. and Vanneman, R. (2015), India Human Development Survey-II, University of Maryland and National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Dhesi, A.S. and Singh, H. (1989) “Education, Labour Market Distortions and Relative Earnings of Different Religion-Caste Categories in India (A Case Study of Delhi)”, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 10: 75–89. Elmslie, B. and Sedo, S. (1996), “Discrimination, Social Psychology and Hysteresis in Labour Markets”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 465–478. Esteve-Bolart, B. (2004), Gender Discrimination and Growth: Theory and Evidence from India, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J. and Lucas, J.A. (1992), “Presumed Incompetent? Stigmatization and ‘Affirmative Action Efforts’”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77: 536–544. Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J. and Stathatos, P. (1997), “The Affirmative Action Stigma of Incompetence: Effects of Performance Information Ambiguity”, Academy of Management Journal, 40: 603–625. Ito, T. (2009), “Caste Discrimination and Transaction Costs in the Labor Market: Evidence from Rural North India”, Journal of Development Economics, 88: 292–300. Jeffery, R. and Jeffery, P. (1997), Population, Gender and Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Leslie, L.M., Mayer, D.M. and Kravitz, D.A. (2014), “The Stigma of Affirmative Action: A Stereotyping-based Theory and Meta-analytic Test of the Consequences for Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 57: 964–989. Long, J.S. and Freese, J. (2014), Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables using Stata, College Station, TX: Stata Press. Macpherson, D.A. and Hirsch, B.T. (1995), “Wages and Gender Composition: Why Do Women’s Jobs Pay Less?”, Journal of Labor Research, 13: 426–471. Myrdal, G. (1944), An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and American Democracy, New York: Pantheon. Osborne, E. (2001), “Culture, Development and Government”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49: 659–685. Riley, J.L. (2012), “Affirmative Action’s Stigma”, The Wall Street Journal (Opinion), 7 May 2012. Schmidt, P. and Strauss, R.P. (1975), “The Prediction of Occupation Using Multinomial Logit Models”, International Economic Review, 16: 471–486. Shorrocks, A.F. (1980), ‘A Class of Additively Decomposable Measures’, Econometrica, 50: 613–625. Theil, H. (1967), Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland. Thimmaiah, G. (2005), “Implications of Reservations in Private Sector”, Economic and Political Weekly, 40: 745–749. Thorat, S., Aryama and Negi, P. (2005) (eds), Reservation and Private Sector: Quest for Equal Opportunity and Growth, New Delhi: Rawat Publications. Thorat, S. and Attewell, P. (2007), “A Legacy of Social Discrimination: A Correspondence Study of Job Discrimination in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 42: 4141–4145. Thorat, S., Tagade, N. and Naik, A.K. (2016), “Prejudice against Reservation Policies: How and Why”, Economic and Political Weekly, 51: 61–69. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/101823 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Caste Gender and Occupational Outcomes. (deposited 16 Jul 2020 17:21)
- Caste Gender and Occupational Outcomes. (deposited 19 Jul 2020 01:52) [Currently Displayed]