Parui, Pintu (2020): Fiscal Expansion, Government Debt and Economic Growth: A Post-Keynesian Perspective.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102740.pdf Download (801kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Constructing a post-Keynesian growth model, we try to explore how the interaction between capital accumulation and government debt opens up the possibility of multiple equilibria and instability in the economy. We investigate the impact of various parameters such as different tax rates, savings propensities, interest rate etc. on the short run aggregate demand and long run equilibrium growth rate and fiscal debt-capital ratio. We explore the relationship between a progressive tax system and wage-led demand regime. We show that when there is fiscal deficit and government incurs debt, a sufficiently high government expenditure to GDP ratio is essential for achieving stability in the system. Moreover, in a certain case, a low speed of adjustment of the rate of capital accumulation is required, as otherwise, the economy may lose its stability and produces the limit cycles. In case of a moderate level of a fiscal expenditure to GDP ratio, when Keynesian stability condition is satisfied, a lower rate of interest and a higher autonomous investment demand are desirable as they enhance the stable region of the economy.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Fiscal Expansion, Government Debt and Economic Growth: A Post-Keynesian Perspective |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Government deficits and debt, Post-Keynesian, Instability, Limit cycle, Growth model |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C62 - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models |
Item ID: | 102740 |
Depositing User: | MR PINTU PARUI |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2020 14:14 |
Last Modified: | 15 Sep 2020 14:14 |
References: | Arestis, P., and M. Sawyer. 2003. “Reinventing Fiscal Policy.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 26:3–25. doi:10.1080/01603477.2003.11051388. Bhaduri, A., and S. Marglin. 1990. “Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 14 (4):375–93. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035141 Blecker, R. 2002. “Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models.” In The Economics of Demand-led Growth: Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run edited by M. Setterfield, 129-152. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Cameron, D. R. 1982. “On the Limits of the Public Economy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 459(1): 46–62. doi:10.1177/0002716282459001004. Charles, S. 2008. “Teaching Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis: A Manageable Suggestion.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31 (1):125–38. doi:10.2753/PKE0160- 3477310106 Commendatore, P., and A. Pinto. 2011. “Public expenditure composition and growth: a neo-Kaleckian analysis”, Papers in Political Economy, L'Harmattan, 61: 187-222. Commendatore, P., C. Panico, and A. Pinto. 2009. “Government spending, effective demand, distribution and growth: a dynamic analysis”, In N. Salvadori (eds.), Institutional and Social Dynamics of Growth and Distribution. Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 118-138. Commendatore P., C. Panico, and A. Pinto. 2011. “The influence of different forms of Government spending on distribution and growth.” Metroeconomica 62(1): 1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2009.04081.x Dallery, T. 2007. “Kaleckian Models of Growth and Distribution Revisited: Evaluating their Relevance through Simulations.” Conference paper, Finance-led Capitalism? Macroeconomic Effects of Changes in the Financial, Berlin (Allemagne). Dutt, A. K. 1984. “Stagnation, Income Distribution and Monopoly Power.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 8(1): 25-40. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035533 Dutt, A. K. 2006. “Maturity, Stagnation and Consumer Debt: A Steindlian approach.” Metroeconomica 57 (3):339–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2006.00246.x Dutt, A. K. 2012. “Distributional Dynamics in Post Keynesian Growth Models.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 34 (3):431–51. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477340303 Dutt, A. K. 2013. “Government spending, aggregate demand, and economic growth.” Review of Keynesian Economics 1(1): 105-119. doi:10.4337/roke.2013.01.06 Hein, E. 2018. “Autonomous Government Expenditure Growth, Deficits, Debt and Distribution in a Neo-Kaleckian Growth Model.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 41:316–38. doi:10.1080/01603477.2017.1422389. Hein, E., Lavoie, M., and T. van Treeck. 2010. “Some instability puzzles in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: a critical survey.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(3), 587–612. doi:10.1093/cje/beq026 Isaac, A. G., and Y. K. Kim. 2013. “Consumer and corporate debt: A neo-Kaleckian synthesis.” Metroeconomica 64(2), 244-271. doi:10.1111/meca.12005 Kaldor, N. 1963. “Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth.” In Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economics Association, edited by Friedrich A. L., and C. Douglas. Hague London: Macmillan. Keefer, P., and S. Knack. 2007. “Boondoggles, rent-seeking, and political checks and balances: Public investment under unaccountable governments.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89: 566-572. Ko, M. C. 2018. “Fiscal policy, government debt, and economic growth in the Kaleckian model of growth and distribution.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1–17. doi:10.1080/01603477.2018.1503056 Kormendi, R. C., and P. G. Meguire. 1985. “Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence.” Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 141-164. Koskela, E. and M. Viren. 2000. “Is there a Laffer curve between aggregate output and public sector employment?” Empirical Economics 25: 605-621. Landau, D. 1983. “Government expenditure and economic growth: A cross-country study.” Southern Economic Journal 49: 783-792. Lavoie, M. 2010. “Surveying short-run and long-run stability issues with the Kaleckian model of growth.” In Setterfield, M. (eds.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 132-156. Lavoie, M. 2014. Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundation. Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar. Palley, T. I. 2013. “Cambridge and neo-Kaleckian Growth and Distribution Theory: com- parison with an Application to Fiscal Policy.” Review of Keynesian Economics 1 (1): 79–104. doi:10.4337/roke.2013.01.05. Parui, P. 2020. “Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: A Post-Keynesian Analysis.” International Review of Applied Economics, forthcoming Ribeiro, R. S. M., and G. T. Lima. 2018. “Government expenditure ceiling and public debt dynamics in a demand-led macromodel.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 1–26. doi:10.1080/01603477.2018.1521289 Rowthorn, R. E. 1981. “Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth.” Thames Papers in Political Economy, 1981: 1-39 Setterfield, M. 2007. “Is There a Stabilizing Role for Fiscal Policy in the New Consensus?” Review of Political Economy 19 (3):405–18. doi:10.1080/09538250701453105. Skott, P. 2010. “Growth, instability and cycles: Harrodian and Kaleckian models of accumulation and income distribution.” In Setterfield, M. (eds.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 108-131. Skott, P. 2012. “Theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function.” Metroeconomica, 63(1), 109–138. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999x.2010.04111.x Skott, P. 2016. “Aggregate Demand, Functional Finance, and Secular Stagnation.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 13 (2):172–88. doi:10.4337/ ejeep.2016.02.03. Steindl, J. 1952. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism, New York: Monthly Review Press. Taylor, L. 1985. “A stagnationist model of economic growth.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 9(4): 383-403. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035588 Taylor, L. 1991. Income Distribution, Inflation, and Growth: Lectures on Structuralist Macroeconomic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, USA. You, J.-II, and A. K. Dutt. 1996. “Government debt, income distribution and growth,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 20(3): 335–351. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013619 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102740 |