Negative Interest Rates on Central Bank Digital Currency

Jia, Pengfei (2020): Negative Interest Rates on Central Bank Digital Currency.

Abstract

Paying negative interest rates on central bank digital currency (CBDC) becomes increasingly relevant to monetary operations, since several major central banks have been actively exploring both negative interest rate policy and CBDC after the Great Recession. This paper provides a formal analysis to evaluate the macroeconomic impact of negative interest rates on CBDC through the lens of a neoclassical general equilibrium model with monetary aggregates. In the benchmark model, agents have access to two types of assets: CBDC and productive capital. The demand for digital currency is motivated by a liquidity constraint. I show that paying negative interest on CBDC induces agents to save less and consume more via a substitution effect. A drop in savings in turn causes a fall in capital investment, subsequent output, and real money balances. To clear the money market, the price level increases. I then extend the model to include government bonds which deliver a positive return. This allows me to study a non-trivial portfolio effect: when the government pays a negative interest rate on CBDC, the tax on agents' capital spending increases, inducing a decrease in capital investment and an increase in government bonds in agents' portfolio. Such a policy causes a drop in investment and output. However, there is a transitory decline in the price level due to a "flight to quality".

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: CBDC, Negative interest rates, Monetary policy, Public money.
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E31 - Price Level ; Inflation ; Deflation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E42 - Monetary Systems ; Standards ; Regimes ; Government and the Monetary System ; Payment Systems; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy ; Stabilization ; Treasury Policy

References

Agur, I., Ari, A., Dell'Ariccia, G., 2020. Designing central bank digital currencies. Journal of Monetary Economics, Forthcoming.

Andolfatto, D., 2015. A model of U.S. monetary policy before and after the Great Recession. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 97, 233--256.

Andolfatto, D., 2020. Assessing the impact of central bank digital currency on private banks. Economic Journal, Forthcoming.

Arseneau, D., 2020. How would U.S. banks fare in a negative interest rate environment? International Journal of Central Banking, Forthcoming.

Bank for International Settlements, 2018. Central bank digital currencies. Report of the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures, March.

Barontini, C., Holden, H., 2019. Proceeding with caution -- a survey on central bank digital currency. BIS Papers 101, Bank for International Settlements.

Barrdear, J., Kumhof, M., 2016. The macroeconomics of central bank issued digital currencies. Bank of England Working Paper 605, Bank of England.

Basten, C., Mariathasan, M., 2018. How banks respond to negative interest rates: Evidence from the Swiss exemption threshold. CESifo Working Paper No.6901.

Bech, M., Malkhozov, A., 2016. How have central banks implemented negative policy rates? BIS Quarterly Review.

Berentsen, A., Schär, F., 2018. The case for central bank electronic money and the non-case for central bank cryptocurrencies. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 100, 97--106.

Boar, C., Holden, H., Wadsworth, A., 2020. Impending arrival: A sequel to the survey on central bank digital currency. BIS Papers 107, Bank for International Settlements.

Bordo, M., Levin, A., 2017. Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy. NBER Working Paper 23711.

Brunnermeier, M., Niepelt, D., 2019. One the equivalence of private and public money. Journal of Monetary Economics 106, 27--41.

Buiter, W., 2009. Negative nominal interest rates: Three ways to overcome the zero lower bound. NBER Working Paper 15118.

Champ, B., Freeman, S., 1990. Money, output, and the nominal national debt. American Economic Review 80, 390--397.

Champ, B., Freeman, S., Haslag, J., 2011. Modeling Monetary Economies, 3rd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Chiu, J., Davoodalhosseini, M., Jiang, J., Zhu, Y., 2019. Bank market power and central bank digital currency: Theory and Quantitative Assessment. Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper 2019--20.

Clarida, R., Galí, J., Gertler, M., 1999. The science of monetary policy: A New Keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1661--1707.

Davoodalhosseini, M., 2018. Central bank digital currency and monetary policy. Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper 2018--36.

Eggertsson, G., Juelsrud, R., Wold, E., 2017. Are negative nominal interest rates expansionary? NBER Working Paper 24039.

Eggertsson, G., Woodford, M., 2003. The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 139--211.

Fernández-Villaverde, J., Sanches, D., Schilling, L., Uhlig, H., 2020. Central bank digital currency: Central banking for all? Working Paper 20--19, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

Fischer, S., 2016. Monetary policy, financial stability, and the zero lower bound. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 106, 39--42.

Freeman, S., Huffman, G., 1991. Inside money, output, and causality. International Economic Review 32, 645--667.

Friedman, M., 1969. The Optimal Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago: Aldine.

Keister, T., Sanches, D., 2019. Should central bank issue digital currency? Working Paper 19--26, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

Krugman, P., 1998. It's baaack: Japan's slump and the return of the liquidity trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 137--205.

Lopez, J., Rose, A., Spiegel, M., 2020. Why have negative interest rates had such a small effect on bank performance? Cross country evidence. European Economic Review 124, 103402.

Niepelt, D., 2020. Reserves for all? Central bank digital currency, deposits, and their (non)-equivalence. International Journal of Central Banking 16, 211--238.

Rognlie, M., 2016. What lower bound? Monetary policy with negative interest rates. working paper, Northwestern University.

Rogoff, K., 2015. Costs and benefits to phasing out paper currency. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2014, vol.29, 445--456.

Rogoff, K., 2016. The Curse of Cash. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Rogoff, K., 2017a. Dealing with monetary paralysis at the zero bound. Journal of Economic Perspective 31, 47--66.

Rogoff, K., 2017b. The Curse of Cash: How Large-Denomination Bills Aid Crime and Tax Evasion and Constrain Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Smith, B. D., 1991. Interest on reserves and sunspot equilibria: Friedman's proposal reconsidered. Review of Economic Studies 58, 93--105.

Tobin, J., 1985. Financial innovation and deregulation in perspective. Monetary and Economic Studies 3, 19--29.

Tobin, J., 1987. The case for preserving regulatory distinctions. Proceedings -- Economic Policy Symposium -- Jackson Hole, 167--205.

Ulate, M., 2019. Going negative at the zero lower bound: The effects of negative nominal interest rates. Working Paper Series 2019--21, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

Wallace, N., 1980. The overlapping generations model of fiat money. In: Kareken, J.H., Wallace, N. (Eds.), Models of Monetary Economies. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, pp. 49--82.