Building an Environmental Quality Index for a big city: a spatial interpolation approach with DP2

Montero, José María and Larraz, Beatriz and Chasco, Coro (2008): Building an Environmental Quality Index for a big city: a spatial interpolation approach with DP2.

Abstract

The elaboration of Environmental Quality Indexes (EQI) for big cities is one of the main topics in regional and environmental economics. One of the usual methodological paths consists of generating a single measure as a linear combination of several air contaminants applying Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Then, as a final step, a spatial interpolation is carried out to determine the level of contamination across the city in order to point out the so-called ‘hot points’. In this article, we propose an alternative approach to build an EQI introducing some methodological and practical novelties. From the point of view of the selection of the variables, first we will consider noise -joint to air pollution- as a relevant environmental variable. We also propose to add ‘subjective’ data -available at the census tracts level- to the group of ‘objective’ environmental variables, which are only available at a number of environmental monitoring stations. This combination leads to a mixed environmental index (MEQI), which is more complete and adequate in a socioeconomic context. From the point of view of the computation process, we use kriging to match the monitoring stations registers to the Census data. We follow an inverse process as usual, since it leads to better estimates. In a first step, we krige the environmental variables to the complete surface and finally, we elaborate the environmental index. At last, in order to build the final synthetic index, we do not use Principal Components Analysis -as it is usual in this kind of exercises- but a better one, the Pena Distance method (DP2).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental index, Air pollution, Noise, Subjecive expectations, Kriging, Distance indicators
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions

References

Anselin L, Le Gallo J (2006) Interpolation of air quality measures in hedonic house price models: Spatial Aspects, Spatial Economic Analysis 1-1, pp. 31-52.

Anselin L, Lozano-Gracia N (2008) Errors in variables and spatial effects in hedonic house price models of ambient air quality, Empirical Economics 34, pp. 5-34.

Banzhaf HS (2005) Green price indices, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49(2), pp. 262-280.

Baranzini A, Ramírez JV (2005) Paying for quietness: the impact of noise on Geneva rents, Urban Studies 42-4, pp. 633-646.

Cancelo JR, Uriz P (1994) Una metodología general para la elaboración de índices complejos de dotación de infraestructuras, Estudios Regionales 40, pp. 167-188.

CES Murcia (2003), La renta familiar disponible bruta y el índice de bienestar de los municipios de la Región de Murcia durante el periodo 1995-2000: estimación y análisis. Available from www.cesmurcia.org.

Chay KY, Greenstone, M (2005) Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market, Journal of Political Economy, 113(2), pp. 376-424.

Delucchi MA, Murphy JJ, McCubbin DR (2002) The health and visibility cost of air pollution: a comparison of estimation methods, Journal of Environmental Management 64, pp. 139-152.

De Iaco S, Myers DE, Posa D (2001) Total air pollution and space–time modelling. In: Monestiez P, Allard D, Froidevaux R (eds.), GeoEnv III—Geostatistics for Environmental Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 45–56.

De Iaco S, Myers DE, Posa D (2002) Space-time variograms and a functional form for total air pollution measurements, Computational statistics & Data Analysis 41, pp. 311-328.

Emery X (2000) Geoestadística lineal, Departamento de Ingeniería de Minas, Facultad de CC. Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile.

Escobar L (2006) Indicadores sintéticos de calidad ambiental: un modelo general para grandes zonas urbanas, Eure XXXII-96, pp. 73-98.

Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation, Oxford University Press, New York.

Gotway CA, Young L (2002) Combining incompatible spatial data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (458), pp. 632-648.

Hartley PR, Hendrix ME, Osherson D (2005) Real estate values and air pollution: measured levels and subjective expectations, Discussion Paper, Rice University.

ISATIS (2001) Isatis v4.1.1. Software Manual, Avon, France: Geovariances and Ecole des Mines de Paris.

Ivanovic B (1963) Classification of underdeveloped areas according to level of economic development, Eastern European Economics II, pp. 1-2.

Ivanovic B (1974) Comment ètablir une liste des indicateurs de development, Revue de Statistique Apliquée 22-2, pp. 37-50.

Jenks GF, Caspall FC (1971) Error on choroplethic maps: definition, measurement, reduction, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 61-2, pp. 217-244.

Kim C-W, Phipps TT, Anselin L (2003) Measuring the benefits o fair quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, pp. 24-39.

Lark, RM, Papritz A (2003) Fitting a linear model of corregionalization for soil properties using simulate annealing, Geoderma 115, pp. 245-260.

Matheron G. (1979) Recherche de simplification dans un problème de cokrigeage. Publication nº 628, Centre de Géostatistique, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Fontainebleau.

Miedema HME, Oudshoorn CGM (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence interval, Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(4), pp. 409-416.

Montero JM, Larraz B (2006) Estimación espacial del precio de la vivienda mediante métodos de krigeado, Estadística Española 48, pp. 62-108.

Murthy MN, Gulati SC, Banerjee A (2003) Hedonic property prices and valuation of benefits from reducing urban air pollution in India, Delhi Discussion Papers 61, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, India. Available from http://ideas.repec.org/p/ind/iegddp/61.html.

Myers DE (1983) Estimation of linear combinations and cokriging, Mathematical Geology 15, pp. 633-637.

Neill HR, Hassenzahl DM, Assane DD (2007) Estimating the effect of air quality: spatial versus traditional hedonic price models, Southern Economic Journal 73 (4), pp. 1088-1111.

Nelson JP (2004) Meta-analysis of airport noise and hedonic property values, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38(1), pp. 1-28.

Official Journal of the European Union (2008) Directive 2008/50/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Available from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOIndex.do.

Palmquist RB (2004) Property values models. In Mäler K-G, Vincent J (eds) Handbook of Environmental Economics vol. 2. North Holland, Amsterdam.

Pena JB (1977) Problemas de la medición del bienestar y conceptos afines (Una aplicación al caso español), Presidencia del Gobierno, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid.

Preisendorfer RW (1988) Principal Component Analysis in meteorology and oceanography. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Royuela V, Suriñach J, Reyes M (2003) Measuring quality of life in small areas over different periods of time. Analysis of the province of Barcelona, Social Indicators Research 64, pp. 51-74.

Sánchez MA, Rodríguez N (2003) El bienestar social en los municipios andaluces en 1999, Revista Asturiana de Economía 27, pp. 99-119.

Smith VK, Huang, J-C (1993) Hedonic models and air pollution: twenty-five years and counting, Environmental and Resource Economics 36-1, pp. 23-36.

Smith VK, Huang JC (1995) Can markets value air quality? A meta-analysis of hedonic property value models, Journal of Political Economy 103, pp. 209-227.

Smith VK, Kaoru Y (1995) Signals or noise—explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, pp. 419-433.

Spence JS, Carmack PS, Gunst RF, Schucany WR, Woodward WA, Haley W (2007) Accounting for spatial dependence in the analysis of SPECT Brain Imaging Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 102, pp. 464-473.

Subramanyam A, Pandalai HS (2004) On the equivalence of the cokriging and kriging systems, Mathematical Geology 36-4, pp. 507-523.

Tzeng S, Huang H-C, Cressie N (2005) A fast, optimal spatial-prediction method for massive datasets, Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, pp. 1343-1357.

Vicéns J, Chasco C (2001) Estimación del indicador sintético de bienestar social publicado en el Anuario Social 2000, Colección Estudios Sociales. Working Papers 1.

Zarzosa P (1996) Aproximación a la medición del bienestar social, Secretariado de Publicaciones e Intercambio Científico, Universidad de Valladolid.