Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria

Fischer, Manfred M. and Varga, Attila (2003): Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Published in: Annals of Regional Science , Vol. 37, No. 2 (2003): pp. 303-322.

Abstract

This paper provides some evidence on the importance of geographically mediated knowledge spillovers from university research activities to regional knowledge production in high-technology industries in Austria. Spillovers occur because knowledge created by universities has some of the characteristics of public goods, and creates value for firms and other organisations. The paper lies in the research tradition that finds thinking in terms of a production function of knowledge useful and looks for patents as a proxy of the 'output' of this process, while university research and corporate R&D investment represent the 'input' side. We refine the classical regional knowledge production function by introducing a more explicit measure to capture the pool of relevant spatial academic knowledge spillovers. A spatial econometric approach is used to test for the presence of spatial effects and – when needed – to implement models that include them explicitly. The empirical results confirm the presence of geographically mediated university spillovers that transcend the spatial scale of political districts. They, moreover, demonstrate that such spillovers follow a clear distance decay pattern.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: knowledge production function, patents, high-technology R&D, spatial econometrics
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Acs Z J, Audretsch D B and Feldman M P (1992) Real effects of academic research: Comment. American Economic Review 82: 363-367 Acs Z J, Audretsch D B and Feldman M P (1994) R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 336-340 Adams J D (1990) Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy 98: 673-702 Adams J D (1993) Science, R&D, and invention potential recharge: U.S. evidence. American Economic Review 83: 458-462 Alston J M, Norton G.W. and Pardey P G (1998) Science under scarcity. CAB International, New York Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer, Boston Anselin L (1995) SpaceStat Version 1.90. http://www.spacestat.com Anselin L and Bera A (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In Ullah A and Giles D (eds.) Handbook of applied economic statistics, 237-289. Marcel Dekker, New York Anselin L and Rey S (1991) Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis 23: 112-131 Anselin L, Varga A and Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422-448 Anselin L, Varga A and Acs Z (2000) Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science 79: 435-443 published in Annals of Regional Science (2003) 37(3):303-322 19 Audretsch D B and Feldman M. P. (1994) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Discussion Paper no. 953, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London Audretsch D B and Feldman M P (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 630-640 Bernstein J I and Nadiri M I (1988) Interindustry R&D spillovers, rates of return, and production in high-tech industries. American Economic Review 78(2): 429-434 Breusch T and Pagan A (1979) A simple test for heteroskedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrics 47: 1287-1294 Cohen W M and Levinthal D A (1989) Innovation and learning. The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99: 569-596 Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-1126 Feldman M (1994) The geographic of innovation. Kluwer, Boston Feldman M P and Audretsch D B (1999) Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialisation and localised competition. European Economic Review 43: 400-429 Feldman M P and Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 210-229 Fischer M M, Fröhlich J and Gassler H (1994) An exploration into the determinants of patent activities: Some empirical evidence for Austria. Regional Studies 28: 1-12 Fischer M M, Fröhlich J, Gassler H and Varga A (2001) The role of space in the creation of knowledge in Austria – An exploratory spatial analysis. In Fischer M M and Fröhlich J (eds.) Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems, 124-145. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York Frost M E and Spence N A (1995) The rediscovery of accessibility and economic potential: The critical issue of self-potential. Environment and Planning A 27: 1833- 1848 Geroski P (1995) Markets of technology: Knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In Stoneman P (ed.) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 90-131. Blackwell, Oxford (UK) and Cambridge (USA) Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92-116 Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 23: 1661-1707 published in Annals of Regional Science (2003) 37(3):303-322 20 Jaffe A B (1989) Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957-970 Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M and Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 63(3): 577-598 Kamien M I and Schwartz N L (1982) Market structure and innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Karlsson C and Manduchi A (2001) Knowledge spillovers in a spatial context – A Critical review and assessment. In Fischer M M and Fröhlich J (eds.) Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems 101-123. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York Levin R C, Klevorick A K, Nelson R R and Winter S G (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987 (3): 783-820 Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and industrial Innovation. Research Policy 20(1): 1-12. Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 55-65. Nelson R (1986) Institutions supporting technical advance in industry. American Economic Review 76: 186-189 OECD (1992) Technology and economy: The key relationships. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris Polanyi M (1967) The tacit dimension. Doubleday Anchor, New York Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: 72-102 Rosenberg N (1976) Perspective on technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Sivitanidou R and Sivitanides P (1995) The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science 25: 391-415 Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer, Boston Verspagen B and De Loo I (1999) Technology spillovers between sectors and over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 60: 215-235 Verspagen B, Moergastel T and Slabbers M (1994) MERIT Concordance Table: IPCISIC (rev.2), MERIT Research Memorandum 2/94-004, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, University of Limburg published in Annals of Regional Science (2003) 37(3):303-322 21 White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimation and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817-830