Chaos in the UK New Keynesian Macroeconomy

Barnett, William and Bella, Giovanni and Ghosh, Taniya and Mattana, Paolo and Venturi, Beatrice (2021): Chaos in the UK New Keynesian Macroeconomy.

Abstract

We study the stability properties and conditions for the onset of Shilnikov chaos in the UK New Keynesian macroeconomy, as well as the shifts in the equilibrium dynamics under various policy regimes. We find that Shilnikov chaos emerges for a restricted part of the free parameters space in the baseline rational expectations UK model with no regime switching. When the UK's central bank showed a weak response to inflation in the high inflation regime, the chaos did not occur at all. But Shilnikov chaos appears easily in the case of the low-inflation regime, which is associated with the Bank of England's use of aggressive monetary policy in recent years. Tightening the monetary policy interest-rate-feedback rule via the Taylor coefficient is one of the policy alternatives proposed by the local analysis for restoring uniqueness. We find that doing so accelerates the emergence of unanticipated phenomena such as Shilnikov's chaotic dynamics. Our results with UK data are thereby consistent with the results with US data by Barnett et al. (2021), who found that the adoption of an active interest rate feedback rule in recent years by the Federal Reserve produces Shilnikov chaos and unintentional downward drift in interest rates towards the lower bound. The source of the chaos and downward drift in interest rates is adoption of a myopic short-run interest-rate feedback rule without a terminal condition as long run anchor. A critical assumption of the results with US and UK data are existence of new Keynesian sticky prices. While the model’s parameters were calibrated with pre-Brexit data, we expect that our results will be highly relevant post-Brexit, as the needed data become available. Changes in the geometry of the Shilnikov fractal attractor set can be expected to be revealing about changes in the level and nature of UK economic risk following Brexit.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Shilnikov chaos criterion, long-term un-predictability, liquidity trap
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C62 - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E63 - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy ; Stabilization ; Treasury Policy

References

Airaudo, M., Zanna, L.F. (2012). Interest rate rules, endogenous cycles, and chaotic dynamics in open economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 36, 1566–1584.

Barnett, W., Bella, G., Ghosh, T., Mattana, P., and Venturi, B. (2021). Shilnikov chaos, low interest rates, and New Keynesian macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, forthcoming.

Barnett, W. A., Gallant, A. R., Hinich, M. J., Jungeilges, J., Kaplan, D., and Jensen, M. J. (1997), “A Single-Blind Controlled Competition between Tests for Nonlinearity and Chaos. Journal of Econometrics, 82, pp. 157-192.

Bella G., Mattana P., and Venturi B. (2017), “Shilnikov chaos in the Lucas model of endogenous growth.” Journal of Economic Theory, 172, pp. 451-477.

Benati, L. (2004) “Evolving Post-World War II UK Economic Performance. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 36, 691– 717.

Benati, L. (2008) “The ‘Great Moderation’ in the United Kingdom. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40, 121– 47.

Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S., and Uribe, M. (2001a), “Monetary Policy and Multiple Equilibria.” American Economic Review, 91(1), pp. 167-186.

Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S., and Uribe, M. (2001b), “The Perils of Taylor Rules.” Journal of Economic Theory, 96(1-2), pp. 40-69.

Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S., and Uribe, M. (2002), “On Taylor Rules and Monetary Policy: Chaotic Interest-Rate Rules.” AEA Papers and Proceedings, 92(2), pp. 72-78.

Benhabib, J.; Evans, G.W.; Honkapohja, S. (2014). Liquidity traps and expectation dynamics: Fiscal stimulus or fiscal austerity? Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 45, 220–238.

Carlstrom, C. T., and Fuerst, T. S. (2003), “Backward-Looking Interest-Rate Rules, Interest-Rate Smoothing, and Macroeconomic Instability.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35(6), pp. 1413-1423.

Castelnuovo, E. and Surico, P. (2005), “The Price Puzzle and Indeterminacy,” Mimeo.

Chen, B., and Zhou, T. (2011), “Shilnikov homoclinic orbits in two classes of 3D autonomous nonlinear systems.” International Journal of Modern Physics B, 25(20), pp. 2697-2712.

Coibion, O., and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2011), “Monetary Policy, Trend Inflation, and the Great Moderation: An Alternative Interpretation.” American Economic Review, 101, 341-70.

Edge, R. M., and Rudd, J. B. (2007), “Taxation and the Taylor principle.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, pp. 2554-2567.

Farmer, J. D., Ott E., Yorke, J. A. (1983), “The dimension of chaotic attractors.” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 7, pp. 153-180.

Feenstra, R. C. (1986), “Functional Equivalence between Liquidity Costs and the Utility of Money,” Journal of Monetary Economics 17, pp. 271-291.

Freire, E. Gamero, E. Rodriguez-Luis, A. J., Algaba, A. (2002), “A note on the triple-zero linear degeneracy: normal forms, dynamical and bifurcation behaviors of an unfolding.” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 12, pp. 2799-2820.

Galí, J., López-Salido, J. D., and Vallés, J. (2004), “Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and the Design of Interest Rate Rules.” Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 36, pp. 739-63.

Geweke, J. (1992), “Inference and Prediction in the Presence of Uncertainty and Determinism.” Comment on L. M. Berliner, “Statistics, Probability, and Chaos,” and S. Chatterjee and M. Yilmaz, “Chaos, Fractals, and Statistics”), Statistical Science 7, pp. 94-101.

Kiley, M. T. (2007), “Is Moderate-to-High Inflation Inherently Unstable?” International Journal of Central Banking, 3(2), pp. 173-201.

Kumhof, M., Nunes, R., and Yakadina, I. (2010), “Simple monetary rules under fiscal dominance.” Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 42(1), pp. 63-92.

Kuznetzov, Y.A. (1998). Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Leeper, E.M. (1991), “Equilibria under ‘active’ and ‘passive’ monetary and fiscal policies.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 27(1), pp. 129-147.

Le Riche, A., Magris, F., and Parent, A. (2017), “Liquidity Trap and stability of Taylor rules.” Mathematical Social Sciences, 88, pp. 16-27.

Liu, P., Mumtaz, H. (2011). Evolving Macroeconomic Dynamics in a Small Open Economy: An Estimated Markov Switching DSGE Model for the UK. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 43, No. 7, 1443-1474.

Lubik, T. A., Schorfheide, F. (2007). Do Central Banks Respond to Exchange Rate Movements? A Structural Investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1069–87.

Natvik, G. J. (2009), “Government Spending and the Taylor Principle.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(1), pp. 57-77.

Nelson, E., and Nikolov, K. (2004) “Monetary Policy and Stagflation in the UK.”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, 293–318.

Poterba, J. M. and Rotemberg, J. J. (1987). “Money in the Utility Function.” In Barnett, W. A. and Singleton, K.J. (eds.), New Approaches to Monetary Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219-240.

Røisland, Ø. (2003), “Capital income taxation, equilibrium determinacy, and the Taylor principle.” Economics Letters, 81(2), pp. 147-153.

Rotemberg, J. J. (1982), “Sticky prices in the United States.” Journal of the Political Economy, 90, pp. 1187-1211

Serletis, A. and Xu, L. (2019), “Consumption, Leisure, and Money,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, 23, pp. 1-30.

Shang, D., and Han, M. (2005), “The existence of homoclinic orbits to saddle-focus.” Applied Mathematics and Computation, 163, pp. 621-631.

Shilnikov, L.P. (1965), “A case of the existence of a denumerable set of periodic motions.” Soviet Mathematics - Doklady, 6, pp. 163-166.

Sveen, T., and Weinke, L. (2007), “Firm-specific capital, nominal rigidities, and the Taylor principle.” Journal of Economic Theory, 136(1), pp. 729-737.

Sveen, T., and Weinke, L. (2005), “New perspectives on capital, sticky prices, and the Taylor principle.” Journal of Economic Theory, Volume 123, Pages 21-39.

Taylor, J.B. (1993). Discretion versus rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy, 39, 195-214.

Tsuzuki, E. (2016), “Fiscal policy lag and equilibrium determinacy in a continuous-time New Keynesian model.” International Review of Economics, 63, 215-232.

Walsh, C. E. (2010), Monetary Theory and Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Third Edition.

Wang, P. and Yip, C. (1992), “Alternative Approaches to Money and Growth,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 24(4), pp. 553-562.

Wiggins, S. (1991), Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Woodford, M. (2003), Interest and prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.